Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens Study

NCT ID: NCT04017572

Last Updated: 2021-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical study is designed to evaluate the theoretical prediction of a lower glucose absorption in optimized automated peritoneal dialysis regimes. Patients will receive both a standard 6 x 2L 1.36% glucose regime or an optimized 7 x 2 L 2.27% glucose + 5 x 2 L 0.1% glucose regime in a crossover fashion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is a rapidly growing, home-based kidney replacement therapy promoting patient autonomy, and is associated with lower societal costs compared to hemodialysis. However, in light of the growing number of diabetic patients on PD, the unwanted glucose absorption during APD is problematic. Recent results (Öberg CM, Rippe B, 2017, see references), using a theoretical model of APD, indicate that large reductions in glucose absorption are possible by using specialized so-called optimized bi-modal treatment regimes having "UF cycles" using a higher glucose concentration (e.g. 2.27% glucose) and "Clearance cycles" using a low glucose concentration (e.g. 0.1% glucose).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Kidney Disease Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard treatment

APD-treatment with a net volume of 12 L 1.36 % anhydrous glucose peritoneal dialysis solution during 540 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) using the Baxter HomeChoice Pro Cycler.

Optimized treatment

APD-treatment with a net volume of 14 L 2.27 % anhydrous glucose peritoneal dialysis solution during 280 minutes followed by a net volume of 10 L 0.1 % glucose dialysis fluid during 200 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) using the Baxter HomeChoice Pro Cycler.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) using the Baxter HomeChoice Pro Cycler.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age between 18 and 75 years;
* duration of PD (automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)) \>4 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

* severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Functional Classification; NYHA III or IV);
* pregnancy;
* catheter malfunction or
* peritonitis within 3 months prior to the trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lund University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Universidad de Córdoba

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baxter Healthcare Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carl M Öberg, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lund University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Privado Centro Médico de Córdoba

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Oberg CM, Rippe B. Optimizing Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Using an Extended 3-Pore Model. Kidney Int Rep. 2017 Apr 27;2(5):943-951. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.04.010. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29270500 (View on PubMed)

Bergling K, de Arteaga J, Ledesma F, Oberg CM. Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Jun 10;6:81. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00620-2. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32528722 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PCT171447

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.