Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Losmapimod in Subjects With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) (NCT NCT04003974)
NCT ID: NCT04003974
Last Updated: 2024-07-10
Results Overview
Skeletal muscle biopsies were collected at Baseline and post-Baseline. DUX4 activity in skeletal muscle biopsies was assessed by measuring expression levels of a panel of 6 genes known to be regulated by DUX4. Expression levels of genes were measured using a validated quantitative RT-PCR assay and expressed as Ct (PCR cycles). Raw Ct for each of the 6 genes was normalized to the specified reference genes to generate a normalized Ct. The DUX4 activity is the average of the normalized Cts of each of the identified 6 genes, where the Ct for each of the 6 genes is first normalized to reference genes before the average is generated. Change in Baseline is calculated as \[average delta Ct across the 6 genes post-baseline\] minus \[average delta Ct across the 6 genes at baseline\].
COMPLETED
PHASE2
80 participants
Baseline and Week 16 to Week 36
2024-07-10
Participant Flow
This study was a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period for 48 weeks which evaluated the efficacy and safety of losmapimod.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
39
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Missing
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of Losmapimod in Subjects With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
Total
n=80 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.44 • n=5 Participants
|
45.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.69 • n=7 Participants
|
45.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.49 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 to Week 36Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Skeletal muscle biopsies were collected at Baseline and post-Baseline. DUX4 activity in skeletal muscle biopsies was assessed by measuring expression levels of a panel of 6 genes known to be regulated by DUX4. Expression levels of genes were measured using a validated quantitative RT-PCR assay and expressed as Ct (PCR cycles). Raw Ct for each of the 6 genes was normalized to the specified reference genes to generate a normalized Ct. The DUX4 activity is the average of the normalized Cts of each of the identified 6 genes, where the Ct for each of the 6 genes is first normalized to reference genes before the average is generated. Change in Baseline is calculated as \[average delta Ct across the 6 genes post-baseline\] minus \[average delta Ct across the 6 genes at baseline\].
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=39 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Double Homeobox 4 (DUX4) Activity in Affected Skeletal Muscle
|
0.8292 Delta threshold cycle (Ct)
Standard Error 0.6138
|
0.4008 Delta threshold cycle (Ct)
Standard Error 0.6491
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: Safety Analysis Set: included all participants who received any study drug.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A Serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment. A treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) is defined as any event that was not present before exposure to study drug or any event that was already present but worsens in either intensity or frequency after exposure to study drug. Number of participants with type of AEs to losmapimod has been presented which included: TEAEs and SAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Type of Adverse Events (AEs) to Losmapimod
Type: SAEs
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Type of Adverse Events (AEs) to Losmapimod
Type: TEAEs
|
29 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: Safety Analysis Set
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment. Number of participants with severity grading of AEs to losmapimod has been presented: Mild (An event that is usually transient in nature and generally does not interfere with normal activities), Moderate (An AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities) and Severe (An AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Severity of AEs to Losmapimod
Severity: Severe
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Severity of AEs to Losmapimod
Severity: Mild
|
18 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Severity of AEs to Losmapimod
Severity: Moderate
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: Safety Analysis Set
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant,temporally associated with use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to study intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death,is life-threatening,requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment. Number of participants with relationship of AEs to losmapimod has been presented:Unlikely related(most likely produced by other factors and temporal relationship of AE to drug makes a causal relationship unlikely),not related (no association between drug and AE), possibly related (treatment with drug caused/contributed to AE),probably related (reasonable temporal sequence of event with drug exists) and definitely related (definite causal relationship exists between drug and AE)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Relationship of AEs to Losmapimod
Relationship: Unlikely related
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Relationship of AEs to Losmapimod
Relationship: Not related
|
16 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Relationship of AEs to Losmapimod
Relationship: Possibly related
|
9 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Relationship of AEs to Losmapimod
Relationship: Probably related
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Relationship of AEs to Losmapimod
Relationship: Definitely related
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: Safety Analysis Set
An AESI (serious or non-serious) is one of scientific and medical concern for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the sponsor can be appropriate. Adverse events of special interest for this study included liver tests that met the criteria for potential drug-induced liver injury (DILI), in accordance with the Unites States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry-Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation. Number of participants with AESIs has been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: Safety Analysis Set
TEAE was an AE that began on or after the first dose of study drug and before the stop of study drug + 7 days or begins before the first dose of study drug and worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug and before the stop of study drug + 7 days. An AE with completely missing onset and end dates were considered as treatment-emergent AE. Number of participants who prematurely discontinued study drug due to a TEAE has been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued Study Drug Due to a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Measurement of the extent of skeletal muscle tissue replacement by fat in FSHD participants were done through automatic skeletal muscle segmentation for the 3D muscle volumes and fat fraction analysis via robust algorithms using Dixon imaging. Composite variables, incorporating pre-selected muscles, were derived for longitudinal analysis of MFF. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=30 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Muscle Fat Fraction (MFF) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 12
|
0.53 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 1.433
|
0.52 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 1.783
|
|
Change From Baseline in Muscle Fat Fraction (MFF) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 24
|
0.45 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 1.053
|
0.99 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 1.723
|
|
Change From Baseline in Muscle Fat Fraction (MFF) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 48
|
1.22 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 2.269
|
1.67 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 2.011
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Measurement of the extent of skeletal muscle tissue replacement by fat in FSHD participants were done through automatic skeletal muscle segmentation for the 3D muscle volumes and fat fraction analysis via robust algorithms using Dixon imaging. Composite variables, incorporating pre-selected muscles, were derived for longitudinal analysis of LMV. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=30 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Lean Muscle Volume (LMV) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 24
|
0.00 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.032
|
-0.04 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.045
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lean Muscle Volume (LMV) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 48
|
-0.10 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.093
|
-0.10 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.114
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lean Muscle Volume (LMV) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 12
|
-0.02 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.069
|
-0.01 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.067
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Measurement of the extent of skeletal muscle tissue replacement by fat in FSHD participants were done through automatic skeletal muscle segmentation for the 3D muscle volumes and fat fraction analysis via robust algorithms using Dixon imaging. Composite variables, incorporating pre-selected muscles, were derived for longitudinal analysis of MFI. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=30 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Muscle Fat Infiltration (MFI) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 48
|
0.07 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 0.796
|
0.47 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 0.655
|
|
Change From Baseline in Muscle Fat Infiltration (MFI) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 12
|
-0.02 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 0.842
|
0.24 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 0.547
|
|
Change From Baseline in Muscle Fat Infiltration (MFI) at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Week 24
|
-0.16 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 0.438
|
0.49 Percentage point
Standard Deviation 0.921
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre dose, 4 hours post dose, Week 4 pre dose, Week 4: 4 hours post dose, Week 12, Week 16 pre dose, Week 16: 4 hours post dose, Week 24, Week 36 pre dose, Week 36: 4 hours post dose, Week 48Population: Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set: included all participants who received at least 1 dose of losmapimod and had an evaluable PK data for losmapimod. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of losmapimod.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Pre dose
|
NA Nanogram per milliliter
NA indicates that Median and full range could not be calculated as the values were Below the level of quantification (BLQ)
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
4 hours post dose
|
61.200 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 6.56 to 147.0
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 4 pre dose
|
27.000 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 3.54 to 120.0
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 4: 4 hours post dose
|
87.600 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 46.4 to 165.0
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 12
|
58.300 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 15.4 to 232.0
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 16 pre dose
|
31.900 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 0.1 to 110.0
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 16: 4 hours post dose
|
82.450 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 21.3 to 145.0
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 24
|
62.150 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 0.1 to 239.0
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 36 pre dose
|
25.100 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 0.1 to 77.1
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 36: 4 hours post dose
|
68.200 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 37.6 to 182.0
|
—
|
|
Plasma Concentration After Administration of Losmapimod
Week 48
|
73.400 Nanogram per milliliter
Interval 0.51 to 163.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 36Population: Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Skeletal muscle biopsy samples were collected at indicated time points for the assessment of concentration of losmapimod.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=16 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of Losmapimod in Skeletal Muscle Biopsy
Baseline
|
0.301 Nanogram per gram
Interval 0.13 to 68.4
|
—
|
|
Concentration of Losmapimod in Skeletal Muscle Biopsy
Week 16
|
56.450 Nanogram per gram
Interval 14.1 to 117.0
|
—
|
|
Concentration of Losmapimod in Skeletal Muscle Biopsy
Week 36
|
93.800 Nanogram per gram
Interval 37.3 to 144.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Day 1: 4 hours post dose, Week 16: pre dose, Week 16: 4 hours post dose, Week 36 pre dose, Week 36: 4 hours post dosePopulation: Pharmacodynamics Analysis Set: included all participants who received at least 1 dose of losmapimod and have evaluable PD data for losmapimod. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected for Pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis of pHSP27/tHSP27. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Percent change from Baseline was defined as value of post Baseline minus Baseline value divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=35 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Phosphorylated Heat Shock Protein 27 (pHSP27)/Total Heat Shock Protein 27 (tHSP27)
Day 1: 4 hours post dose
|
-34.228 Percent change
Standard Deviation 21.3731
|
10.968 Percent change
Standard Deviation 41.3115
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Phosphorylated Heat Shock Protein 27 (pHSP27)/Total Heat Shock Protein 27 (tHSP27)
Week 16: pre dose
|
16.392 Percent change
Standard Deviation 102.7915
|
39.497 Percent change
Standard Deviation 92.6947
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Phosphorylated Heat Shock Protein 27 (pHSP27)/Total Heat Shock Protein 27 (tHSP27)
Week 16: 4 hours post dose
|
-18.888 Percent change
Standard Deviation 59.0971
|
34.176 Percent change
Standard Deviation 83.1994
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Phosphorylated Heat Shock Protein 27 (pHSP27)/Total Heat Shock Protein 27 (tHSP27)
Week 36 pre dose
|
-46.203 Percent change
Standard Deviation 28.4928
|
20.445 Percent change
Standard Deviation 203.8013
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Phosphorylated Heat Shock Protein 27 (pHSP27)/Total Heat Shock Protein 27 (tHSP27)
Week 36: 4 hours post dose
|
-62.250 Percent change
Standard Deviation 18.6709
|
-8.908 Percent change
Standard Deviation 74.6476
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
The RWS was a 3-dimensional sensor-based system (using a single depth-ranging sensor) that could unobtrusively detect an individual's RWS and reflect an individual global upper extremity function, including shoulder and proximal arm. Participants were seated in front of a 3D camera and asked to perform a standardized upper extremity movement protocol under the supervision of a study clinical evaluator with and without weights and on both the right and left arms at indicated time points. The absolute total RWS surface envelope area as well as areas for each of the quadrants was calculated and provided in a blinded fashion, with no access to treatment assignment information. The RWS RSA represented the portion of the unit hemisphere that was covered by an individual's hand movement. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=37 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 4: Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
-0.0009 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.07652
|
-0.0022 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.06615
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 12: Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
0.0109 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.09214
|
-0.0069 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.09547
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 24: Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
-0.0066 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.10246
|
-0.0094 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.10672
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 36: Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
-0.0169 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.09346
|
-0.0371 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.12235
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 48: Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
0.0103 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.07273
|
-0.0267 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.08972
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 4: Non-Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
0.0077 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.07212
|
0.0189 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.07697
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 12: Non-Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
0.0156 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.07221
|
0.0084 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.08577
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 24: Non-Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
0.0259 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.06960
|
0.0114 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.09087
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 36: Non-Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
0.0287 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.09934
|
-0.0069 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.09770
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reachable Work Space (RWS) Dominant and Non-dominant Total Relative Surface Area (RSA) With Weight Quintant (Q)1 to Q5
Week 48: Non-Dominant Total RSA Weighted Q1 to Q5
|
0.0169 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.09090
|
-0.0129 Unitless
Standard Deviation 0.09841
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
The TUG test was a simple test that was used to assess a person's mobility and required both static and dynamic balance. It measured the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The optimized TUG test was the classic TUG but added the component of getting up from a laying position on a bed-like table in the clinic at the start of the test and laying back down on his or her back at the end of the test. Participants were timed as they started from a seated or laying position, rise to a standing position, walked a total of 6 meters and then returned to either a seated or laying position. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=39 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Classic Timed Up and Go (TUG) Average Completion Time
Week 4
|
2.011 Seconds
Standard Deviation 16.8603
|
0.297 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.0577
|
|
Change From Baseline in Classic Timed Up and Go (TUG) Average Completion Time
Week 12
|
-0.340 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.5908
|
0.183 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.7839
|
|
Change From Baseline in Classic Timed Up and Go (TUG) Average Completion Time
Week 24
|
0.960 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.8012
|
0.384 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.9678
|
|
Change From Baseline in Classic Timed Up and Go (TUG) Average Completion Time
Week 36
|
0.252 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.8725
|
0.709 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.6041
|
|
Change From Baseline in Classic Timed Up and Go (TUG) Average Completion Time
Week 48
|
-0.340 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.1289
|
0.789 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.7059
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
The TUG test was a simple test that was used to assess a person's mobility and required both static and dynamic balance. It measured the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The optimized TUG test was the classic TUG but added the component of getting up from a laying position on a bed-like table in the clinic at the start of the test and laying back down on his or her back at the end of the test. Participants were timed as they started from a seated or laying position, rise to a standing position, walked a total of 6 meters and then returned to either a seated or laying position. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=36 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSDH) TUG Average Completion Time
Week 4
|
-0.993 Seconds
Standard Deviation 3.4234
|
0.750 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.1824
|
|
Change From Baseline in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSDH) TUG Average Completion Time
Week 12
|
-0.380 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.7827
|
0.058 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.7805
|
|
Change From Baseline in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSDH) TUG Average Completion Time
Week 24
|
0.549 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.9794
|
0.304 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.8555
|
|
Change From Baseline in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSDH) TUG Average Completion Time
Week 36
|
-0.653 Seconds
Standard Deviation 4.1121
|
0.389 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.7394
|
|
Change From Baseline in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSDH) TUG Average Completion Time
Week 48
|
0.342 Seconds
Standard Deviation 3.7028
|
0.334 Seconds
Standard Deviation 2.0296
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Quantitative isometric dynamometry (hand-held dynamometer) was used to assess the skeletal muscles strength of study participants in both the upper and lower limbs bilaterally. The MicroFET2 hand-held dynamometer was used to measure strength in the bilateral shoulders, elbow flexors and extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors. The Jamar Plus Digital Hand Dynamometer was used to measure bilateral grip strengths. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=38 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in All Muscles Total Average Strength as Assessed by Hand-held Dynamometry
Week 12
|
1.439 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 11.5791
|
-0.230 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 9.5417
|
|
Change From Baseline in All Muscles Total Average Strength as Assessed by Hand-held Dynamometry
Week 24
|
-1.551 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 22.8920
|
-9.477 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 15.6318
|
|
Change From Baseline in All Muscles Total Average Strength as Assessed by Hand-held Dynamometry
Week 36
|
-3.608 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 33.1467
|
-11.772 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 22.7106
|
|
Change From Baseline in All Muscles Total Average Strength as Assessed by Hand-held Dynamometry
Week 48
|
-5.358 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 22.0734
|
-15.021 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 28.3042
|
|
Change From Baseline in All Muscles Total Average Strength as Assessed by Hand-held Dynamometry
Week 4
|
5.064 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 15.3103
|
-1.386 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 9.2043
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
The MFM scale assessed the severity of the motor deficit as determined by an experienced physical therapist. The MFM domain 1 was a validated evaluator administered functional measure for neuromuscular disorders, with 13 items related to standing and transfers. Generic Values for each domain were: 0 = cannot perform the task, 1 = initiated the task, 2 - performs the movement incompletely, or completely but imperfectly, 3 = performs the task fully and 'normally'. Total score was the sum of all the domains for D1 divided by the maximum score possible and multiplied by 100. Min=0, Max = 100. Lower numbers on the scale represented a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=25 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Domain 1 Score
|
2.76 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.079
|
2.00 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.780
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
The FSHD-HI was a 15-domain questionnaire designed and based on participant interviews to measure total FSHD health-related quality-of-life, including both motor impairment and the social and emotional impact of FSHD. 116 questions were combined into a total score, the score is transformed onto a percentage scale, with score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (maximal disability); lower scores represented decreasing disability. Baseline was defined as last non-missing evaluation on or before the day of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated as Baseline minus post-dose value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=28 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in FSHD Health Index (HI)
|
1.17 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.499
|
-0.64 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.024
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: At Week 48Population: Full Analysis Set.
The PGI-C was a one-time assessment to measure the participant's impression of the how their illness had changed over time. It is a single question that assessed on a scale of 1-7 if there has been an improvement, decline or no change in clinical status. The score ranged from: Responses of 1= Very much improved, 2= Much improved, and 3= Minimally improved which were considered as improved and responses of 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6= Much worse, and 7=Very much worse were considered as not improved. Higher scores indicated worse symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Improved and Not Improved Response to Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Improved: Week 48
|
8 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Improved and Not Improved Response to Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Not Improved: Week 48
|
21 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alcohol poisoning
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Losmapimod 15 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID)
n=40 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive losmapimod tablets 15 mg (2×7.5 mg tablets/dose BID) orally (PO) for 48 weeks
|
Placebo
n=40 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets PO BID for 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alcohol poisoning
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
15.0%
6/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site rash
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural contusion
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematoma
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural swelling
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stress fracture
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bowel movement irregularity
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental necrosis
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Exostosis
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Haematoma muscle
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Mobility decreased
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in jaw
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendon disorder
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal bacterial overgrowth
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Kidney infection
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Amnesia
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Postural tremor
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis acneiform
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Night sweats
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin depigmentation
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Yellow skin
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Initial insomnia
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Stress
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood iron decreased
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Erythema of eyelid
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Food allergy
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to Week 48
Safety population which included all participants who received any study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER