Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Find Out if Fezolinetant Helps Reduce Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes in Women Going Through Menopause (NCT NCT04003155)
NCT ID: NCT04003155
Last Updated: 2024-11-04
Results Overview
The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Baseline was the average number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours based on the non-missing values in the 10 days immediately prior to randomization.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
527 participants
Baseline and week 4
2024-11-04
Participant Flow
Postmenopausal women participants 40 to 65 years of age who had moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and seeking treatment or relief for VMS associated with menopause, confirmed as menopausal, had to have minimum average of 7 to 8 moderate to severe hot flashes (HFs) (VMS) per day within the 10 days prior to randomization and who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study.
Prior to randomization, participants had a screening period during which a minimum 10-day collection of baseline VMS frequency and severity assessments were performed.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, once daily (QD) up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg Fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
STARTED
|
175
|
176
|
176
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
Full Analysis Set
|
175
|
173
|
174
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
Safety Analysis Set
|
175
|
174
|
173
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
Treated
|
175
|
173
|
174
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
152
|
142
|
161
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
23
|
34
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
|
Extension Period (EP) (40 Weeks)
STARTED
|
0
|
142
|
158
|
76
|
76
|
|
Extension Period (EP) (40 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
124
|
143
|
62
|
67
|
|
Extension Period (EP) (40 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
18
|
15
|
14
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, once daily (QD) up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg Fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
9
|
8
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
9
|
12
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind (DB) Period (12 Weeks)
Miscellaneous
|
1
|
7
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Extension Period (EP) (40 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
|
Extension Period (EP) (40 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
Extension Period (EP) (40 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
12
|
7
|
9
|
5
|
|
Extension Period (EP) (40 Weeks)
Miscellaneous
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study intervention. The randomized treatment for each participant was used for summaries by treatment group based on the FAS, even if a participant erroneously received a different treatment.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=175 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=176 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=176 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Total
n=527 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=175 Participants
|
54.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=176 Participants
|
54.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=176 Participants
|
54.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=527 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
175 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
527 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
46 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
128 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
133 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
128 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
389 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: White
|
142 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
150 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
143 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
435 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Black or African American
|
28 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Asian
|
3 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: More Than One Race
|
0 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Unknown
|
0 Participants
n=175 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=176 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per 24 hours
|
10.51 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.79 • n=175 Participants • Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study intervention. The randomized treatment for each participant was used for summaries by treatment group based on the FAS, even if a participant erroneously received a different treatment.
|
10.65 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73 • n=173 Participants • Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study intervention. The randomized treatment for each participant was used for summaries by treatment group based on the FAS, even if a participant erroneously received a different treatment.
|
10.44 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.92 • n=174 Participants • Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study intervention. The randomized treatment for each participant was used for summaries by treatment group based on the FAS, even if a participant erroneously received a different treatment.
|
10.53 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.16 • n=522 Participants • Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study intervention. The randomized treatment for each participant was used for summaries by treatment group based on the FAS, even if a participant erroneously received a different treatment.
|
|
Severity of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per 24 hours
|
2.43 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.35 • n=175 Participants • FAS Population
|
2.39 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34 • n=173 Participants • FAS Population
|
2.40 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.35 • n=174 Participants • FAS Population
|
2.41 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.35 • n=522 Participants • FAS Population
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study intervention. The randomized treatment for each participant was used for summaries by treatment group based on the FAS, even if a participant erroneously received a different treatment. Participants with available data at specified time point were included.
The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Baseline was the average number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours based on the non-missing values in the 10 days immediately prior to randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=166 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=157 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=164 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4
|
-3.32 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.29
|
-5.19 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
-5.39 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Baseline was the average number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours based on the non-missing values in the 10 days immediately prior to randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=139 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=146 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12
|
-3.90 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.31
|
-6.28 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.32
|
-6.44 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.31
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day at post baseline visit was calculated as follows: \[(number of mild hot flashes per day x 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes per day x 2) + (number of severe hot flashes per day x 3)\]/Total number of daily mild/moderate/severe hot flashes Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for participants that had no mild or moderate or severe VMS. Higher scores indicates greater severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=166 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=157 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=164 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4
|
-0.27 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.42 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.46 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day at post baseline visit was calculated as follows: \[(number of mild hot flashes per day x 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes per day x 2) + (number of severe hot flashes per day x 3)\]/Total number of daily mild/moderate/severe hot flashes Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for participants that had no mild or moderate or severe VMS. Higher scores indicates greater severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=139 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=146 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12
|
-0.37 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.60 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.57 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
The PROMIS SD SF 8b assesses self-reported sleep disturbance over the past 7 days and includes perceptions of restless sleep; satisfaction with sleep; refreshing sleep; difficulties sleeping, getting to sleep or staying asleep; amount of sleep; and sleep quality. Because it assesses the participants experience of sleep disturbance, the measure does not focus on specific sleep-disorder symptoms or ask patients to report objective measures of sleep (e.g., total amount of sleep, time to fall asleep and amount of wakefulness during sleep). Responses to each of the 8 items range from 1 (no disturbed sleep) to 5 (disturbed sleep), and the range of possible summed raw scores is 8 to 40. Higher scores on the PROMIS SD SF 8b indicate more of the disturbed sleep.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=148 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=133 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=156 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance - Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD SF 8b) Total Score at Week 12
|
-3.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-3.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
|
-4.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Baseline was the average number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours based on the non-missing values in the 10 days immediately prior to randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=174 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=169 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=166 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 2
|
-2.76 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.28
|
-4.73 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.28
|
-4.58 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.28
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 3
|
-3.15 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.28
|
-5.14 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.29
|
-5.25 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.29
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 7
|
-3.71 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
-5.80 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.31
|
-5.97 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 8
|
-3.71 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
-6.10 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.31
|
-6.10 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 10
|
-4.09 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
-6.30 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.31
|
-6.25 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 1
|
-1.82 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.26
|
-3.63 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.26
|
-3.07 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.26
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 5
|
-3.49 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.28
|
-5.56 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.29
|
-5.67 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.29
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 6
|
-3.58 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.29
|
-5.70 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
-5.97 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.29
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 9
|
-4.09 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
-6.16 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.31
|
-6.24 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 11
|
-3.89 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.31
|
-6.37 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.31
|
-6.34 VMS per day
Standard Error 0.30
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day at post baseline visit was calculated as follows: \[(number of mild hot flashes per day x 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes per day x 2) + (number of severe hot flashes per day x 3)\]/Total number of daily mild/moderate/severe hot flashes Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for participants that had no mild or moderate or severe VMS. Higher scores indicates greater severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=175 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=173 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=174 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 9
|
-0.35 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.62 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.56 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 11
|
-0.37 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.64 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.61 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 1
|
-0.15 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.25 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.25 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 2
|
-0.21 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.35 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.36 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 3
|
-0.27 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.43 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.43 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 5
|
-0.29 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.46 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.46 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 6
|
-0.30 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.55 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 7
|
-0.28 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.52 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.54 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 8
|
-0.29 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.57 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.53 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 10
|
-0.34 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.62 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.57 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Baseline was the average number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours based on the non-missing values in the 10 days immediately prior to randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=175 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=173 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=174 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 2
|
-25.08 Percent change
Standard Error 2.50
|
-42.37 Percent change
Standard Error 2.55
|
-43.37 Percent change
Standard Error 2.54
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 3
|
-28.81 Percent change
Standard Error 2.54
|
-46.94 Percent change
Standard Error 2.59
|
-50.00 Percent change
Standard Error 2.57
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 4
|
-30.59 Percent change
Standard Error 2.67
|
-47.34 Percent change
Standard Error 2.72
|
-51.65 Percent change
Standard Error 2.69
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 5
|
-32.55 Percent change
Standard Error 2.65
|
-50.12 Percent change
Standard Error 2.71
|
-54.33 Percent change
Standard Error 2.67
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 6
|
-33.35 Percent change
Standard Error 2.72
|
-51.74 Percent change
Standard Error 2.78
|
-57.18 Percent change
Standard Error 2.73
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 7
|
-34.85 Percent change
Standard Error 2.86
|
-53.14 Percent change
Standard Error 2.93
|
-56.26 Percent change
Standard Error 2.85
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 8
|
-35.71 Percent change
Standard Error 2.83
|
-55.88 Percent change
Standard Error 2.90
|
-56.89 Percent change
Standard Error 2.83
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 11
|
-38.05 Percent change
Standard Error 2.84
|
-58.37 Percent change
Standard Error 2.90
|
-60.18 Percent change
Standard Error 2.82
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 12
|
-37.06 Percent change
Standard Error 2.89
|
-57.13 Percent change
Standard Error 2.95
|
-61.24 Percent change
Standard Error 2.86
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 1
|
-16.63 Percent change
Standard Error 2.31
|
-32.15 Percent change
Standard Error 2.34
|
-28.84 Percent change
Standard Error 2.35
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 9
|
-39.64 Percent change
Standard Error 2.87
|
-56.31 Percent change
Standard Error 2.93
|
-58.54 Percent change
Standard Error 2.85
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Percent Change in The Frequency of Moderate And Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 10
|
-39.51 Percent change
Standard Error 2.81
|
-57.39 Percent change
Standard Error 2.87
|
-59.01 Percent change
Standard Error 2.79
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12Population: FAS Population
The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Baseline was the average number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours based on the non-missing values in the 10 days immediately prior to randomization. Participant has \>=50% reduction from baseline to each post baseline week for the frequency of moderate to severe VMS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=175 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=173 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=174 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 1
|
18 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 2
|
37 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 3
|
42 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 4
|
49 Participants
|
77 Participants
|
94 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 5
|
47 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
94 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 10
|
45 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
100 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 11
|
55 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
100 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 12
|
52 Participants
|
77 Participants
|
99 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 6
|
50 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
96 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 7
|
52 Participants
|
79 Participants
|
98 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 8
|
52 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
87 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Percent Reduction of >=50% in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 9
|
56 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
97 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12Population: FAS Population
The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Baseline was the average number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours based on the non-missing values in the 10 days immediately prior to randomization. Participant has 100% reduction from baseline to each post baseline week for the frequency of moderate to severe VMS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=175 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=173 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=174 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 2
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 3
|
1 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 6
|
2 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 8
|
2 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 9
|
5 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 10
|
7 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 11
|
10 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 12
|
6 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 4
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 5
|
2 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week Up to Week 12
Week 7
|
2 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 48, 52 of fezolinetant exposure (weeks 16, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 for arms Placebo/Fezolinetant 30 mg and Placebo/Fezolinetant 45 mg)Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
The PGI is comprised of 2 companion 1-item PRO measures analogous to the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales. These measures provide brief, stand-alone global assessments prior to and after initiating a study medication. Patient-perceived change from the initiation of treatment (PGI-C)-VMS is used to evaluate meaningful within-person changes over time in VMS. This measure provides patient-perceived change from the initiation of treatment. The PGI-C VMS asks: "Compared to the beginning of this study, how would you rate your HFs/night sweats now?" Subject ratings range from (1) much better to (7) much worse. Participant ratings range from 1=much better, 2= moderately better, 3= a little better, 4= no change, 5= a little worse, 6= moderately worse, 7= much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=160 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=150 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=160 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 4: Much better
|
32 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 4: A little better
|
44 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 4: No change
|
55 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 4: Moderately worse
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 12: Much better
|
35 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 12: Moderately better
|
24 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 12: No change
|
37 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 12: A little worse
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 12: Moderately worse
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 12: Much worse
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 16: Much better
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 16: Moderately better
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 16: No change
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 16: A little worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 16: Much worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 24: A little worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 24: Moderately worse
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 32: Much better
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 36: Moderately better
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 36: No change
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 36: Much worse
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 40: Much better
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
33 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 40: Moderately better
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 40: A little better
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 40: No change
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 40: Moderately worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 48: Moderately better
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 48: No change
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 48: A little worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 52: Much better
|
—
|
56 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 52: Moderately better
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 52: A little better
|
—
|
23 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 52: Moderately worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 4: Moderately better
|
21 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 4: A little worse
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 4: Much worse
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 12: A little better
|
40 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 16: A little better
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 16: Moderately worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 20: Much better
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 20: Moderately better
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 20: A little better
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 20: No change
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 20: A little worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 20: Moderately worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 20: Much worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 24: Much better
|
—
|
55 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 24: Moderately better
|
—
|
27 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 24: A little better
|
—
|
34 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 24: No change
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 24: Much worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 28: Much better
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 28: Moderately better
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 28: A little better
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 28: No change
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 28: A little worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 28: Moderately worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 28: Much worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 32: Moderately better
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 32: A little better
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 32: No change
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 32: A little worse
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 32: Moderately worse
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 32: Much worse
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 36: Much better
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 36: A little better
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 36: A little worse
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 36: Moderately worse
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 40: A little worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 40: Much worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 48: Much better
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 48: A little better
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 48: Moderately worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 48: Much worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 52: No change
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 52: A little worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in VMS at Each Visit
Week 52: Much worse
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks of fezolinetant exposure (week 36 for arms Placebo/Fezolinetanat 30 mg and Placebo/Fezolinetant 45 mg)Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Baseline was the average number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours based on the non-missing values in the 10 days immediately prior to randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=121 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=138 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=60 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=62 Participants
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate, and Severe VMS at Week 24
|
-7.15 VMS per day
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
-7.32 VMS per day
Standard Deviation 4.58
|
-6.89 VMS per day
Standard Deviation 3.67
|
-7.32 VMS per day
Standard Deviation 4.53
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks of fezolinetant exposure (week 36 for arms Placebo/Fezolinetanat 30 mg and Placebo/Fezolinetant 45 mg)Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day at post baseline visit was calculated as follows: \[(number of mild hot flashes per day x 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes per day x 2) + (number of severe hot flashes per day x 3)\]/Total number of daily mild/moderate/severe hot flashes Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but participant was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for participants that had no mild or moderate or severe VMS. Higher scores indicates greater severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=121 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=138 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=60 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=62 Participants
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate, and Severe VMS at Week 24
|
-0.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
-0.77 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-0.78 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
-0.76 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (to 55 weeks)Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. A participant erroneously receiving a treatment different from their randomized treatment was assigned to the treatment group that the participant received as first dose.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, \& which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product (mp) whether or not considered related to the mp. An AE is considered "serious" if it results in death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, results in congenital anomaly or birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or leads to prolongation of hospitalization, hospitalization for treatment/observation/examination caused by AE is to be considered as serious, discontinuation due to increases in liver enzymes, other medically important events. TEAE was defined as an AE observed from first dose date up to 21 days after last dose.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=175 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=174 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=173 Participants
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Drug-Related TEAE
|
22 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Serious TEAE
|
1 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Drug-Related Serious TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
TEAE Leading to Death
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Treatment
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Death
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
TEAE
|
78 Participants
|
108 Participants
|
115 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Death
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Treatment
|
9 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Double-blind Period: Placebo
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=175 participants at risk
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=174 participants at risk
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to Week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=173 participants at risk
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=76 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=76 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.57%
1/175 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.57%
1/174 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
1.3%
1/76 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test increased
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.57%
1/174 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
1.3%
1/76 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.57%
1/174 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.57%
1/174 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.57%
1/174 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Apocrine breast carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
1.3%
1/76 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign lung neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioma of liver
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
1.3%
1/76 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.57%
1/174 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric stenosis
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic pain
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
1.3%
1/76 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.57%
1/174 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/173 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Vascular disorders
Varicose vein
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/174 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Double-blind Period: Placebo
n=175 participants at risk
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo (two fezolinetant matching placebo tablets) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=174 participants at risk
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg (one 30 mg fezolinetant tablet and one placebo tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to Week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=173 participants at risk
Participants received fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD up to week 12 during double-blind treatment period followed by fezolinetant 45 mg (one 30 mg tablet and one 15 mg tablet) orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 30 mg
n=76 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
Double-blind Period: Placebo/Extension Period: Fezolinetant 45 mg
n=76 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo during double-blind treatment period were re-randomized to receive fezolinetant 45 mg orally, QD from week 13 up to week 52 during extension treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
5.2%
9/174 • Number of events 9 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
6.4%
11/173 • Number of events 11 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
5.3%
4/76 • Number of events 4 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
7.9%
6/76 • Number of events 6 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.7%
3/175 • Number of events 3 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
1.7%
3/174 • Number of events 6 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
5.2%
9/173 • Number of events 9 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 2 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
1.3%
1/76 • Number of events 2 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
2.3%
4/175 • Number of events 4 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
4.6%
8/174 • Number of events 9 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
5.8%
10/173 • Number of events 13 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 2 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 2 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
3.4%
6/175 • Number of events 6 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
3.4%
6/174 • Number of events 6 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
2.9%
5/173 • Number of events 8 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
6.6%
5/76 • Number of events 11 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
1.3%
1/76 • Number of events 1 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
|
0.00%
0/175 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
5.7%
10/174 • Number of events 15 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
4.6%
8/173 • Number of events 14 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 4 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
2.3%
4/175 • Number of events 4 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
3.4%
6/174 • Number of events 8 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
4.0%
7/173 • Number of events 12 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
5.3%
4/76 • Number of events 4 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
0.00%
0/76 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
7.4%
13/175 • Number of events 14 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
6.3%
11/174 • Number of events 17 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
8.1%
14/173 • Number of events 15 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
3.9%
3/76 • Number of events 5 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
6.6%
5/76 • Number of events 11 • From first dose date up to 21 days after last dose (up to 55 weeks)
|
Additional Information
Clinical Trial Disclosure
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Institute and/or Principal Investigator may publish trial data generated at their specific study site after Sponsor publication of the multi-center data. Sponsor must receive a site's manuscript prior to publication for review and comment as specified in the Investigator Agreement.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER