Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
634 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-05
2018-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Parent Child Program to Prevent Adolescent Pregnancy
NCT02333019
Evaluation of Big Decisions in Three South Texas School Districts
NCT04508569
Wrap It Up Rigorous Evaluation
NCT06574321
Brief Intervention for Teen Pregnancy Prevention
NCT02816424
Louisville Teen Pregnancy Prevention Project
NCT01411878
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A combination of venue-based and area sampling methods was used in 4 Rio Grande Valley counties to recruit Latino adolescents and their parents residing in colonias for study participation. The 4 counties (Willacy, Starr, Hidalgo, Cameron) were chosen due to well documented SRH disparities among youth.Trained recruitment promotores attended local community health fairs, shopping malls, supermarkets, etc. where large numbers of resident families could be engaged. During these events, recruitment promotores made initial contact with potentially eligible youth and their families in order to screen for study inclusion criteria. In addition, recruiters went door-to-door in targeted communities conducting active outreach and engagement of families directly within their homes. Eligible families were informed that they were being asked to participate in a research project seeking to improve access to SRH programming for adolescents and that participation would require, at minimum, participating in a survey now as well as after 3 and 9 months. We obtained informed assent and parental consent for all adolescents participating in the study. Parents provided their consent to participate.Refusal bias data was collected as part of the screening process. Refusal data suggested no significant differences between those families declining to participate and those agreeing to be part of the study.
Adolescents and their parents completed baseline, immediate post-baseline (3 months), and delayed follow-up (9 months) assessments using self-administered surveys in either English or Spanish, based on preference. Prior to initiation of the RCT, surveys were pilot tested to ensure conceptual clarity and linguistic appropriateness. To ensure confidentiality, parents and adolescents completed questionnaires separately. A social desirability scale was included in the measurement protocol to assess the extent to which participant responses reflect social desirability bias.
A computer random number generation program was used to create a randomly permutated scheme that assigned specific subject identification numbers to either the experimental or passive control group in a one-to-one ratio. An allocation sequence was generated by the principal investigator. Each experimental/control group allocation sequence was placed in a sealed envelope which remained concealed until after participants had enrolled into the study. After the baseline was completed, the sealed envelope was opened with the family's allocation tied to their specific ID. Data collectors administering the immediate and delayed follow-up surveys were blinded to the condition of participants.
Parents randomized to the experimental group received the Families Talking Together (FTT) intervention, an evidence-based program designed to increase parent-adolescent communication about sex in order to delay sexual debut and prevent negative SRH outcomes in young adolescents (aged 10 to 14). The FTT intervention has been delivered with efficacy in multiple settings, including schools and clinics. FTT is also identified by the United States Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Adolescent Health (OAH) as a high quality, effective prevention program. The FTT intervention consisted of two components. Intervention component 1 was comprised of two FTT intervention sessions between a parent and the bilingual and bicultural promotor trained to deliver FTT in either English or Spanish. Intervention sessions were delivered to parents in their home or a mutually agreed upon private location in the community. Intervention component 2 was comprised of written supplemental materials that promotores used to guide each intervention session. Written materials included a family FTT workbook and a short story entitled 'Victor and Maria.'
During each intervention session, promotores reviewed the intervention materials and instructed parents how to structure conversations about delaying sexual debut and the use of contraception with their adolescent. At three and 9 months post-baseline, adolescents in the experimental and control groups completed follow-up surveys administered by data collectors.
To examine group differences in parent-adolescent communication variables, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was used. To ensure baseline equivalence between the two arms of the RCT, demographic and outcome variables were compared at baseline between the intervention and control groups. In order to assess the generalizability of results across traditional and robust methods of analysis, all analyses were repeated with bootstrapping. Additionally, outlier and specification-error for each analysis was conducted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Received Families Talking Together (FTT) intervention, an evidence-based program designed to increase parent-adolescent communication about sex in order to delay sexual debut and prevent negative sexual and reproductive health outcomes in adolescents age 10-14. The FTT intervention consisted of two components. Component 1 was comprised of 2 FTT intervention sessions between a parent and bilingual/bicultural promotor trained to deliver FTT in English or Spanish. These sessions highlighted adverse health consequences of sex to motivate parents to communicate with their adolescent and provided guidance to parents on communication strategies. Component 2 was comprised of written supplemental materials that promotores used to guide each intervention session. Experimental condition families will complete all measurement assessments.
Families Talking Together (FTT)
FTT is an evidence-based program designed to increase parent-adolescent communication about sex in order to delay sexual debut and prevent negative SRH outcomes in young adolescents (aged 10 to 14). The FTT intervention has been delivered with efficacy in multiple settings, including schools and clinics (Guilamo-Ramos et al., 2011a; Guilamo-Ramos et al., 2011b).
Control
Parents randomized to the control group did not receive any intervention sessions and only completed assessment questionnaires.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Families Talking Together (FTT)
FTT is an evidence-based program designed to increase parent-adolescent communication about sex in order to delay sexual debut and prevent negative SRH outcomes in young adolescents (aged 10 to 14). The FTT intervention has been delivered with efficacy in multiple settings, including schools and clinics (Guilamo-Ramos et al., 2011a; Guilamo-Ramos et al., 2011b).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least one a parent present in home, defined as a biological or non-biological primary caregiver
* Resident of target geographic community (Willacy, Starr, Hidalgo, or Cameron) in the Rio Grande Valley
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack of parent or caregiver in home during recruitment
* Resident of non-target community in the Rio Grande Valley
10 Years
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Healthy Futures of Texas
UNKNOWN
New York University
OTHER
Rio Grande Valley Council
UNKNOWN
Power to Decide
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gillian Sealy, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Power to Decide, The National Campaign to Prevent Unplanned Pregnancy
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Guilamo-Ramos V, Bouris A, Jaccard J, Gonzalez B, McCoy W, Aranda D. A parent-based intervention to reduce sexual risk behavior in early adolescence: building alliances between physicians, social workers, and parents. J Adolesc Health. 2011 Feb;48(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.007.
Guilamo-Ramos V, Jaccard J, Dittus P, Bouris A, Gonzalez B, Casillas E, Banspach S. A comparative study of interventions for delaying the initiation of sexual intercourse among Latino and black youth. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Dec;43(4):247-54. doi: 10.1363/4324711. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
Office of Adolescent Health. (2017). Families Talking Together (FTT). Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/oah-initiatives/tpp_program/db/programs/ebp-ftt.html.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PAWOS000011-01-00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.