Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mechanism of Action of tACS for the Treatment of MDD (NCT NCT03994081)

NCT ID: NCT03994081

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Results Overview

Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the fifth day of the intervention prior to stimulation.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

20 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Day 5

Results posted on

2024-09-19

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes. tACS: XCSITE100
Sham Stimulation
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation. Sham tACS: XCSITE100
Overall Study
STARTED
10
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Mechanism of Action of tACS for the Treatment of MDD

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=10 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes. tACS: XCSITE100
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation. Sham tACS: XCSITE100
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Day 5

Population: Day 5 - Day 1

Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the fifth day of the intervention prior to stimulation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=10 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes. tACS: XCSITE100
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation. Sham tACS: XCSITE100
Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured Durin Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Day 5 of Stimulation.
0.042 microvolts^2/Hz
Standard Deviation 0.221
0.169 microvolts^2/Hz
Standard Deviation 0.338

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, two-week follow-up visit

Population: Data for 1 participant unavailable due to missed visit.

Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the two-week follow-up after intervention.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=9 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes. tACS: XCSITE100
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation. Sham tACS: XCSITE100
Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured During Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up of Stimulation.
-0.016 microvolts^2/Hz
Standard Deviation 0.199
0.012 microvolts^2/Hz
Standard Deviation 0.243

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Day 5

Correlation Coefficient (r) will be used to determine if there is a relationship between the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline to Day 5 and the two-week follow up and change in the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations before stimulation at baseline and Day 5 of stimulation. The HDRS is a clinician-rated measure of depression severity where higher scores indicate greater depression severity. To calculate the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations, Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=10 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes. tACS: XCSITE100
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation. Sham tACS: XCSITE100
Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Day 5 of Intervention and Changes in Symptoms of Depression.
-0.263 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
-0.109 Pearson Correlation Coefficient

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, two-week follow-up visit

Population: Data for 1 participant unavailable due to missed visit.

Correlation Coefficient (r) will be used to determine if there is a relationship between the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline, Day 5 and to two-week follow up and change in the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations before stimulation at baseline and Day 5 of stimulation. The HDRS is a clinician-rated measure of depression severity where higher scores indicate greater depression severity. To calculate the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations, Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=9 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes. tACS: XCSITE100
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation. Sham tACS: XCSITE100
Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up and Depression Symptoms.
0.624 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
0.087 Pearson Correlation Coefficient

Adverse Events

Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham Stimulation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=10 participants at risk
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes. tACS: XCSITE100
Sham Stimulation
n=10 participants at risk
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation. Sham tACS: XCSITE100
Nervous system disorders
Headache
70.0%
7/10 • Number of events 14 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
70.0%
7/10 • Number of events 27 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Nervous system disorders
Restlessness
60.0%
6/10 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Nervous system disorders
Vision Changes
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Nervous system disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
50.0%
5/10 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Nervous system disorders
Fatigue
70.0%
7/10 • Number of events 25 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
90.0%
9/10 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Cramps
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Irritation
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal Ideation
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
General disorders
Feeling cold
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Eye disorders
Eye Twitching
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
Psychiatric disorders
Vivid Dreams
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up

Additional Information

Tobias Schwippel, MD

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Phone: 919-966-9929

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place