Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mechanism of Action of tACS for the Treatment of MDD (NCT NCT03994081)
NCT ID: NCT03994081
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Results Overview
Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the fifth day of the intervention prior to stimulation.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
Baseline, Day 5
2024-09-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes.
tACS: XCSITE100
|
Sham Stimulation
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation.
Sham tACS: XCSITE100
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Mechanism of Action of tACS for the Treatment of MDD
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=10 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes.
tACS: XCSITE100
|
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation.
Sham tACS: XCSITE100
|
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 5Population: Day 5 - Day 1
Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the fifth day of the intervention prior to stimulation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=10 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes.
tACS: XCSITE100
|
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation.
Sham tACS: XCSITE100
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured Durin Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Day 5 of Stimulation.
|
0.042 microvolts^2/Hz
Standard Deviation 0.221
|
0.169 microvolts^2/Hz
Standard Deviation 0.338
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, two-week follow-up visitPopulation: Data for 1 participant unavailable due to missed visit.
Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the two-week follow-up after intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=9 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes.
tACS: XCSITE100
|
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation.
Sham tACS: XCSITE100
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured During Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up of Stimulation.
|
-0.016 microvolts^2/Hz
Standard Deviation 0.199
|
0.012 microvolts^2/Hz
Standard Deviation 0.243
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 5Correlation Coefficient (r) will be used to determine if there is a relationship between the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline to Day 5 and the two-week follow up and change in the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations before stimulation at baseline and Day 5 of stimulation. The HDRS is a clinician-rated measure of depression severity where higher scores indicate greater depression severity. To calculate the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations, Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=10 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes.
tACS: XCSITE100
|
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation.
Sham tACS: XCSITE100
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Day 5 of Intervention and Changes in Symptoms of Depression.
|
-0.263 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
|
-0.109 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, two-week follow-up visitPopulation: Data for 1 participant unavailable due to missed visit.
Correlation Coefficient (r) will be used to determine if there is a relationship between the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline, Day 5 and to two-week follow up and change in the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations before stimulation at baseline and Day 5 of stimulation. The HDRS is a clinician-rated measure of depression severity where higher scores indicate greater depression severity. To calculate the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations, Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=9 Participants
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes.
tACS: XCSITE100
|
Sham Stimulation
n=10 Participants
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation.
Sham tACS: XCSITE100
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up and Depression Symptoms.
|
0.624 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
|
0.087 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
|
Adverse Events
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
Sham Stimulation
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
n=10 participants at risk
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes.
tACS: XCSITE100
|
Sham Stimulation
n=10 participants at risk
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation.
Sham tACS: XCSITE100
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
70.0%
7/10 • Number of events 14 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
70.0%
7/10 • Number of events 27 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Restlessness
|
60.0%
6/10 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Vision Changes
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
50.0%
5/10 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Fatigue
|
70.0%
7/10 • Number of events 25 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
90.0%
9/10 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Cramps
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Irritation
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal Ideation
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
General disorders
Feeling cold
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Twitching
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Vivid Dreams
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events were assessed at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5 and 2-week follow-up
|
Additional Information
Tobias Schwippel, MD
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place