Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pharmacokinetics (PKs) and Metabolism of Radiolabelled Linerixibat (NCT NCT03992014)
NCT ID: NCT03992014
Last Updated: 2020-06-26
Results Overview
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
6 participants
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dose
2020-06-26
Participant Flow
This was a two-period, mass balance study in healthy male participants to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), excretion and metabolism of Linerixibat. The study was conducted at a single center in the United Kingdom.
A total of 10 participants were screened of which 4 failed screening and 6 participants were enrolled in the study. The study had 2 treatment periods (each of 8 days) with a washout of 7 days. All participants were followed-up at Day 34.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Linerixibat Tab+[14C]Linerixibat IV/[14C] Linerixibat Oral Sol
Participants were administered a single oral dose of 90 milligram (mg) linerixibat (two tablets \[tab\] of 45 mg each) in fasted state followed by an intravenous (IV) infusion of 100 micrograms (μg) radiolabeled \[14C\]-linerixibat infused over 3 hours on Day 1 of treatment period 1. Participants received 60 milliliter (mL) of 90 mg \[14C\]-linerixibat oral solution (sol) in the fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 2. The treatment periods were separated by a washout period of about 7 days (at least 13 days between oral doses). All participants were followed-up at Day 34.
|
|---|---|
|
Treatment Period 1 (8 Days)
STARTED
|
6
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (8 Days)
COMPLETED
|
6
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
|
Washout Period (7 Days)
STARTED
|
6
|
|
Washout Period (7 Days)
COMPLETED
|
6
|
|
Washout Period (7 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (8 Days)
STARTED
|
6
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (8 Days)
COMPLETED
|
6
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Pharmacokinetics (PKs) and Metabolism of Radiolabelled Linerixibat
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Linerixibat Tab+[14C]Linerixibat IV/[14C] Linerixibat Oral Sol
n=6 Participants
Participants were administered a single oral dose of 90 milligram (mg) linerixibat (two tablets \[tab\] of 45 mg each) in fasted state followed by an intravenous (IV) infusion of 100 micrograms (μg) radiolabeled \[14C\]-linerixibat infused over 3 hours on Day 1 of treatment period 1. Participants received 60 milliliter (mL) of 90 mg \[14C\]-linerixibat oral solution (sol) in the fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 2. The treatment periods were separated by a washout period of about 7 days (at least 13 days between oral doses). All participants were followed-up at Day 34.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.13 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population comprised of all participants in the Safety Population (all participants who took atleast one dose of study treatment) who had at least 1 non-missing PK assessment. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero (Pre-dose) Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUC[0-inf]) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
Linerixibat 90 mg oral tablets
|
1554 Hours*picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.8
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero (Pre-dose) Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUC[0-inf]) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
[14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
|
1570 Hours*picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.7
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=3 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: AUC(0-inf) of [14C]-Linerixibat Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat Solution
|
1634 Hours*picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population.
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: AUC From Time Zero (Pre-dose) to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
Linerixibat 90 mg oral tablets
|
749 Hours*picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 125
|
—
|
|
Period 1: AUC From Time Zero (Pre-dose) to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
[14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
|
1560 Hours*picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.8
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: AUC(0-t) of [14C]-Linerixibat Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C] Linerixibat Solution
|
1044 Hours*picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79.4
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
Linerixibat 90 mg oral tablets
|
120 Picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 108
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
[14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
|
638 Picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Cmax of [14C]-Linerixibat Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C] Linerixibat Solution
|
158 Picogram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 270
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
Linerixibat 90 mg oral tablets
|
2.25 Hours
Interval 0.5 to 5.5
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
[14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
|
1.49 Hours
Interval 0.983 to 2.5
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Tmax of [14C]-Linerixibat Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C] Linerixibat Solution
|
7.50 Hours
Interval 2.0 to 48.1
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population.
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
Linerixibat 90 mg oral tablets
|
6.76 Hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 124
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Linerixibat and [14C]-Linerixibat Following Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
[14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
|
0.828 Hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=3 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: t1/2 of [14C]-Linerixibat Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C] Linerixibat Solution
|
6.25 Hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Not applicable (NA) indicates geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as a single participant was analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=1 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: AUC(0-inf) of Total Radioactivity Following IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
2300 Hours*picogram equivalent per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Not applicable (NA) indicates geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as a single participant was analyzed.
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population.
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: AUC(0-inf) of Total Radioactivity Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat Solution
|
94740 Hours*picogram equivalent per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.17
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population.
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: AUC(0-t) of Total Radioactivity Following IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
1903 Hours*picogram equivalent per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: AUC(0-t) of Total Radioactivity Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C] Linerixibat Solution
|
67533 Hours*picogram equivalent per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Cmax of Total Radioactivity Following IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
738 Picogram equivalent per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.6
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Cmax of Total Radioactivity Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C] Linerixibat Solution
|
2784 Picogram equivalent per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Tmax of Total Radioactivity Following IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
1.49 Hours
Interval 0.983 to 2.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Tmax of Total Radioactivity Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C] Linerixibat Solution
|
0.50 Hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=1 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: t1/2 of [14C]-Linerixibat for Total Radioactivity Following IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
0.733 Hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
NA indicates geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as a single participant was analyzed.
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: t1/2 of [14C]-Linerixibat for Total Radioactivity Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C] Linerixibat Solution
|
98.3 Hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.7
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of [14C]-Linerixibat Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
16340 Milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.7
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Total Plasma Clearance (CL) of [14C]-Linerixibat Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
1032 Milliliters per minute
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Hepatic clearance was calculated as total plasma IV clearance minus renal clearance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Hepatic Clearance (CLh) of [14C]-Linerixibat Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
867 Milliliters per minute
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.4
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis. Absolute bioavailability is the amount of drug from a formulation that reaches the systemic circulation relative to an IV dose. It is expressed as percentage bioavailability, which is calculated by ratio of AUC(oral)/Dose(oral) with AUC(IV)/Dose(IV) multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Absolute Oral Bioavailability (F) of Linerixibat Following Administration of Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
0.0517 Percentage bioavailability
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 120
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points. Fh was expressed as percentage and was calculated as: 1 minus hepatic extraction ratio multiplied by 100. Hepatic extraction ratio=hepatic blood clearance (milliliters per minute)/hepatic blood flow (milliliters per minute).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=5 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Percentage of Drug Escaping First-pass Hepatic Clearance (Fh) of Linerixibat Following Administration of Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
24.4 Percentage of drug escaped
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.4
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points. Fa was expressed as percentage which was calculated as ratio of oral bioavailability and Fh multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=5 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Percentage of Drug Absorbed (Fa) for Linerixibat Following Administration of Oral Dose of Linerixibat and IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
|
0.167 Percentage of drug absorbed
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73.7
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96, 0-120, 0-144 and 0-168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Urine samples were collected at indicated time points and total radioactivity measurement was done using Liquid Scintillation counting (LSC). Percentage of radioactive dose excreted in urine was calculated as (amount excreted in urine divided by administered radioactivity dose) multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat.
0-24 Hours
|
16.4 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat.
0-48 Hours
|
16.4 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat.
0-72 Hours
|
16.5 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat.
0-96 Hours
|
16.5 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat.
0-120 Hours
|
16.5 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat.
0-144 Hours
|
16.5 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat.
0-168 Hours
|
16.5 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96, 0-120, 0-144 and 0-168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population.
Urine samples were collected at indicated time points and total radioactivity measurement was done using LSC. Percentage of radioactive dose excreted in urine was calculated as (amount excreted in urine divided by administered radioactivity dose) multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-24 Hours
|
0.04 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-48 Hours
|
0.04 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-72 Hours
|
0.04 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-96 Hours
|
0.04 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-120 Hours
|
0.04 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-144 Hours
|
0.04 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Urine Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-168 Hours
|
0.04 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96, 0-120, 0-144 and 0-168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population
Feces samples were collected at indicated time points and total radioactivity measurement was done using LSC. Percentage of radioactive dose excreted was calculated as (amount excreted in feces homogenate divided by administered radioactivity dose) multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-24 Hours
|
33.4 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 19.4
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-48 Hours
|
43.6 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-72 Hours
|
61.3 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-96 Hours
|
67.8 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-120 Hours
|
68.8 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-144 Hours
|
69.1 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of IV Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-168 Hours
|
69.2 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96, 0-120, 0-144 and 0-168 hours post-dosePopulation: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Feces samples were collected at indicated time points and total radioactivity measurement was done using LSC. Percentage of radioactive dose excreted was calculated as (amount excreted in feces homogenate divided by administered radioactivity dose) multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=5 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-24 Hours
|
41.2 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 46.5
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-48 Hours
|
64.4 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 40.6
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-72 Hours
|
84.4 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 15.7
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-96 Hours
|
93.2 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-120 Hours
|
96.3 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-144 Hours
|
97.0 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Summary of Mean Cumulative Total Recovery (Percentage Excreted) in Feces Following Administration of Oral Dose of [14C]-Linerixibat
0-168 Hours
|
97.1 Percentage dose
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 34 daysPopulation: Safety Population comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
n=6 Participants
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any AEs
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 34 daysPopulation: Safety Population
Blood samples were collected to analyze the following hematology parameters; Basophils, Eosinophils, Erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume (MCV), Erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), Erythrocytes, Hematocrit (HCT), Hemoglobin (Hb), Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets, Reticulocytes and Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes. Participants were counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, normal or high), unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
n=6 Participants
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Basophils, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Basophils, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Basophils, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Eosinophils, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Eosinophils, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Eosinophils, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
MCV, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
MCV, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
MCV, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
MCH, To low
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
MCH, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
MCH, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Erythrocytes, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Erythrocytes, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Erythrocytes, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
HCT, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
HCT, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
HCT, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Hb, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Hb, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Hb, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Leukocytes, To low
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Leukocytes, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Leukocytes, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Lymphocytes, To low
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Lymphocytes, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Lymphocytes, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Monocytes, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Monocytes, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Monocytes, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Neutrophils, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Neutrophils, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Neutrophils, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Platelets, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Platelets, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Platelets, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Reticulocytes, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Reticulocytes, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Reticulocytes, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Reticulocytes/Erythrocyte, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range
Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 34 daysPopulation: Safety Population
Blood samples were collected to analyze the following clinical chemistry parameters; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, calcium, chloride, cholesterol, creatinine, direct bilirubin, globulin, glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, phosphate, potassium, protein, sodium, triglycerides, urate and urea. Participants were counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, normal or high), unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
n=6 Participants
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
ALP, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
ALT, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
ALT, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
ALT, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Albumin, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Albumin, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Albumin, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
ALP, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
ALP, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
AST, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
AST, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
AST, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Bilirubin, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Bilirubin, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Bilirubin, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Calcium, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Calcium, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Calcium, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Chloride, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Chloride, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Chloride, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Cholesterol, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Cholesterol, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Cholesterol, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Creatinine, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Creatinine, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Creatinine, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Direct Bilirubin, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Direct Bilirubin, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Direct Bilirubin, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Globulin, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Globulin, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Globulin, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Glucose, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Glucose, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Glucose, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
HDL Cholesterol, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
HDL Cholesterol, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
HDL Cholesterol, To high
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
LDL Cholesterol, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
LDL Cholesterol, To normal or no change
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
LDL Cholesterol, To high
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Phosphate, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Phosphate, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Phosphate, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Potassium, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Potassium, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Potassium, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Protein, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Protein, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Protein, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Sodium, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Sodium, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Sodium, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Triglycerides, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Triglycerides, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Triglycerides, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Urate, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Urate, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Urate, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Urea, To low
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Urea, To normal or no change
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range
Urea, To high
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 34 daysPopulation: Safety Population
Urine samples were collected to assess urine glucose, urine protein, urine blood, urine ketones, urine bilirubin, urine urobilinogen, urine nitrite and urine leukocyte esterase by dipstick test. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameter can be read as negative (-) and positive (+) indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. Number of participants who had abnormal findings in any of these urinalysis parameters are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
n=6 Participants
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 34 daysPopulation: Safety Population
Full 12-lead ECGs were recorded with the participants in a supine position. 12-lead ECGs were obtained using an automated ECG machine that measured PR, QRS, QT and QT duration corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals and calculated heart rate. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. The number of participants with clinically significant abnormal findings for ECG parameters at worst-case post Baseline are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
n=6 Participants
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
DBP was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
-1.2 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 4.11
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
2.0 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 8.81
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
DBP was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in DBP at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
-2.4 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 7.27
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in DBP at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
2.1 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 6.56
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 34 (post Day 1 of Period 1 dosing)Population: Safety Population
DBP was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DBP at Follow-up Visit (Day 34)
|
1.2 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 6.66
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
Pulse rate was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
1.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 4.20
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
1.9 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 4.02
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
Pulse rate was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
-0.6 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 4.20
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
1.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 34 (post Day 1 of Period 1 dosing)Population: Safety Population
Pulse rate was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Follow-up Visit (Day 34)
|
2.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.79
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
SBP was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
5.2 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 11.16
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
6.6 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
SBP was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in SBP at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
-1.1 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 8.73
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in SBP at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
6.5 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 6.39
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 34 (post Day 1 of Period 1 dosing)Population: Safety Population
SBP was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in SBP at Follow-up Visit (Day 34)
|
2.4 Millimeters of mercury
Standard Deviation 8.96
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
Respiratory rate was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 4.15
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
Respiratory rate was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
-0.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
-0.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 34 (post Day 1 of Period 1 dosing)Population: Safety Population
Respiratory rate was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Follow-up Visit (Day 34)
|
-1.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.67
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
Tympanic membrane temperature was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Tympanic Membrane Temperature at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
0.4 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
—
|
|
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Tympanic Membrane Temperature at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
-0.4 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 (4 Hours) and Day 8Population: Safety Population
Tympanic membrane temperature was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in Tympanic Membrane Temperature at Indicated Time-points
Day 1 (4 Hours)
|
0.2 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
—
|
|
Period 2: Change From Baseline in Tympanic Membrane Temperature at Indicated Time-points
Day 8
|
-0.4 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 34 (post Day 1 of Period 1 dosing)Population: Safety Population
Tympanic membrane temperature was measured in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Mean of the triplicate pre-dose assessments on Day 1 of treatment period 1 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 Participants
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1.
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tympanic Membrane Temperature at Follow-up Visit (Day 34)
|
0.3 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Linerixibat 90 mg Oral Tablets + [14C] Linerixibat 100 μg IV
n=6 participants at risk
Eligible participants received 25 mL of intravenous (IV) radiolabelled \[14C\]-Linerixibat 100 microgram (μg) infused over 3 hours immediately after the Linerixibat 90 mg (two 45 mg) tablets orally in fasted state on Day 1 of treatment period 1
|
[14C]-Linerixibat 90 Milligram Oral Solution
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received single 60 mL oral solution of 90 mg \[14C\]-Linerixibat on Day 1 of treatment period 2 in fasted state
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
16.7%
1/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
33.3%
2/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
16.7%
1/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
16.7%
1/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
0.00%
0/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
16.7%
1/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
0.00%
0/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
16.7%
1/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
16.7%
1/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.7%
1/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
0.00%
0/6 • SAEs and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment up to Day 34.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER