Study of Ampion for the Treatment of Pain and Function in Patients With Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knee.
NCT ID: NCT03988023
Last Updated: 2022-10-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
1043 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-24
2021-07-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
AP-003-C Study to Confirm the Efficacy of Ampion™ in Adults With Pain Due to Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT03182686
A Study to Evaluate Safety of Three Intra-articular Injections of Ampion in the Knee of Adults With Osteoarthritis Pain
NCT02184156
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy & Safety of an Intra-Articular Ampion Injection for Pain of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT02556710
A Study of Embeda (Kadian NT, ALO-01) in Subjects With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
NCT00420992
A Pilot Study on the Onset of Action of KTP, 20% in the Treatment of Acute Pain Associated With Tendonitis or Bursitis of the Shoulder, Elbow or Knee
NCT00903994
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The co-primary trial objectives are to evaluate the greater efficacy for pain improvement and function improvement of 4 mL Ampion versus saline intra-articular (IA) injection when applied to patients suffering from severe osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK). Efficacy will primarily be assessed with WOMAC A pain and WOMAC C function scores.
Mean change in the WOMAC A weekly pain scores from Baseline to Week 12 will be compared between Ampion and saline control. Mean change in WOMAC C function score will be compared between Ampion and saline control. This will test whether Ampion is superior to saline in improving pain and function.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AMPION™ 4 mL dose
4 mL injection of Ampion
Ampion
4 mL injection of Ampion
Saline
4 mL injection of placebo
Saline
Saline solution, 4 mL, single intra-articular injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ampion
4 mL injection of Ampion
Saline
Saline solution, 4 mL, single intra-articular injection
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Willing and able to comply with all study requirements and instructions of the site study staff
* Must be ambulatory
* Index knee must be symptomatic for greater than 6 months with a clinical diagnosis of OAK and supported by radiological evidence (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 4) that is not older than 6 months prior to the date of screening
* Moderate to moderately-severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain in the index knee (rating of at least 1.5 on the WOMAC Index 3.1 as measured by 5-point Likert Pain Subscale) assessed at screening
* Ability to temporarily discontinue nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for 48 hours prior to scheduled clinical efficacy evaluations
* No analgesia (including acetaminophen \[paracetamol\]) taken 12 hours prior to an efficacy measure
* No known clinically significant liver abnormality (e.g. cirrhosis, transplant, etc.).
Exclusion Criteria
* A history of allergic reactions to human albumin (reaction to non-human albumin such as egg albumin is not an exclusion criterion)
* A history of allergic reactions to excipients in 5% human albumin (N-acetyltryptophan, sodium caprylate)
* Presence of tense effusions
* Inflammatory or crystal arthropathies, acute fractures, history of aseptic necrosis or joint replacement in the affected knee, as assessed locally by the Principal Investigator
* Isolated patella femoral syndrome, also known as chondromalacia
* Any other disease or condition interfering with the free use and evaluation of the index knee for the duration of the trial (e.g. cancer, congenital defects, spine osteoarthritis)
* Major injury to the index knee within the 12 months prior to screening
* Severe hip osteoarthritis ipsilateral to the index knee
* Any pain that could interfere with the assessment of index knee pain (e.g. pain in any other part of the lower extremities, pain radiating to the knee)
* Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment targeting OA started or changed during the 4 weeks prior to randomization or likely to be changed during the duration of the study
* Use of the following medications:
1. No IA injected pain medications in the study knee during the study
2. No analgesics containing opioids. NSAIDs may be continued at levels preceding the study, however may not be used 48 hours prior to efficacy evaluations, and acetaminophen is available as a rescue medication during the study from the provided supply
3. No topical treatment on osteoarthritis index knee during the study
4. No significant anticoagulant therapy (e.g. Heparin or Lovenox) during the study (treatment such as Aspirin and Plavix are allowed)
5. No systemic treatments that may interfere with safety or efficacy assessments during the study
6. No immunosuppressants
7. No use of corticosteroids \> 10 mg prednisolone equivalent per day
8. If corticosteroid use is ≤ 10 mg prednisolone equivalent per day, and if clinically indicated, subjects should be allowed to decrease their corticosteroid use. Additionally, some subjects may need to increase their steroid dose to treat worsened symptoms in the treated knee, and subjects who increase their corticosteroid dose above their starting dose of corticosteroid during the study will be treated as "treatment failures" for efficacy analysis
* No human albumin treatment in the 3 months before randomization or throughout the duration of the study
40 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ampio Pharmaceuticals. Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Howard Levy, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ampio Pharmaceuticals. Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Denver Metro Orthopedics
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AP-013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.