The Value of Follow-Up After Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in Denmark - Family Perspectives
NCT ID: NCT03985215
Last Updated: 2020-09-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-12-31
2021-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: Follow-Up
NCT03545659
International Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Pediatric Study
NCT01281735
AML Electronic Decision Aid
NCT03442452
An Observational Study on The Health Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia
NCT01395615
Efficacy of Intermediate and High Intensity Regimens in Patients With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
NCT04699162
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The risk of relapse after treatment for ALL is highest within the first two years after cessation of maintenance therapy. Therefore, it has been routine in most countries to follow-up patients in the outpatient clinic every one or two months during the first years after end of therapy for ALL in order to detect recurrence and possible late sequelae at an early stage.
In children with ALL there are only a few studies on the value of routine follow-up, including haematological status after cessation of maintenance therapy. These studies showed that approximately 90% of the relapses were diagnosed in children with symptoms of leukaemia progression and that routine blood tests and clinical follow-ups were of little value. It is well known that there are other issues besides the risk of relapse, which are relevant for families after cessation of ALL therapy i.e. risk of late effects of treatment, psychosocial problems related to the child's return to "normal" life etc. These issues will also have an impact upon how the follow-up programs are planned. The investigators will study the family perspectives on follow-up during the first 5-years after cessation of maintenance therapy in a Danish cohort of children treated according to the NOPHO ALL-2008 protocol.
The investigators will conduct a cross-sectional study. Outcomes are patient-reported as the measurement instrument used is questionnaires. Eligible families are families with children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Denmark and being in the period 0-5 years after cessation of maintenance therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaires
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory questionnaire. Self-designed questionnaire.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age group 1.0-14.9 years.
* Patients treated on one of the four Danish Paediatric oncology departments
* Patients in the time period 0-5 years after cessation of maintenance therapy for ALL
Exclusion Criteria
* Bone marrow transplantation
* Down syndrome
* If, due to language barriers, the family is unable to complete the questionnaire.
1 Year
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karen S Jensen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aarhus Universitet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Karen Schow Jensen
Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-051-000001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.