Trial Outcomes & Findings for EMS for Abdominal and Gluteal Muscle Toning (NCT NCT03983304)
NCT ID: NCT03983304
Last Updated: 2025-05-16
Results Overview
Measurement of participant's perception about body shape, assessed using the Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ)at the 4-Week post-treatment follow-up visit. The scale measures body image using a set of dichotomous items used to describe aspects of shape and appearance. The questionnaire has total score range from 10 to 50. An increase in score (when compared to baseline) reflects the participant's perceived improvement in appearance in the treated region(abdomen or buttocks). Questionnaire results were tabulated as the numerical change between mean baseline scores and scores recorded at the 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit. A positive change reflects an increase in the body satisfaction questionnaire total score.
COMPLETED
NA
110 participants
Baseline, 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit
2025-05-16
Participant Flow
Participants received EMS therapy on abdomen and/or buttocks in 4 sessions over a 2-week period, with follow-up visits 4 and 12 wks post final treatment. Per-protocol Population included all treated participants followed for 4 wks post treatment, with weight change of no more than 5% of total body weight at the time of the 4-Wk post-treatment images compared to baseline (pre-treatment) images, and who completed 4 treatments. Per protocol, data presented here as planned/collected (all enrolled).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
EMS Device Treatment Group
All enrolled participants treated with the EMS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
110
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
103
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
EMS Device Treatment Group
All enrolled participants treated with the EMS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
EMS for Abdominal and Gluteal Muscle Toning
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
EMS Device Treatment Group
n=110 Participants
All enrolled participants treated with the EMS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
110 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Am Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Pac Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown - Missing Data Point
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
110 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
23.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 4-week post-treatment follow-up visitPopulation: Per-protocol population. Participants with completed questionnaires specific to each body area treated.
Measurement of participant's perception about body shape, assessed using the Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ)at the 4-Week post-treatment follow-up visit. The scale measures body image using a set of dichotomous items used to describe aspects of shape and appearance. The questionnaire has total score range from 10 to 50. An increase in score (when compared to baseline) reflects the participant's perceived improvement in appearance in the treated region(abdomen or buttocks). Questionnaire results were tabulated as the numerical change between mean baseline scores and scores recorded at the 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit. A positive change reflects an increase in the body satisfaction questionnaire total score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EMS Device Treatment - Abdomen
n=92 Participants
All eligible participants for whom informed consent is obtained will be treated on the abdomen with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device.
|
EMS Treatment - Buttocks
n=32 Participants
All eligible participants for whom informed consent is obtained will be treated on the buttocks with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Satisfaction Questionnaire From Baseline to 4-Week Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit
|
5.1 Participants completed Questionnaire
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
5.5 Participants completed Questionnaire
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: AE information will be collected from the time of enrollment to the final follow-up visit at 12 weeks following the final treatment.Population: All participants enrolled in the study and treated with the EMS device were evaluated for adverse events throughout the study. Investigators determined if an AE was not related, possibly related, probably related or definitely related to the study device. Data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
The incidence of device-related adverse events (AE) including device-related serious AEs will be tabulated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EMS Device Treatment - Abdomen
n=110 Participants
All eligible participants for whom informed consent is obtained will be treated on the abdomen with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device.
|
EMS Treatment - Buttocks
All eligible participants for whom informed consent is obtained will be treated on the buttocks with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Incidents of Device-Related Adverse Events
|
6 Device-Related Adverse Events
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-week post-treatment follow-up visitPopulation: Per-protocol population. Participants with completed questionnaires at the 4-week post treatment follow-up visit.
Subject-graded improvement in the treated area using the Subject Global Aesthetic Scale (SGAIS) at the 4-Week follow-up visit. In this study, subjects completed the SGAIS questionnaire for each treated area (e.g. a abdomen-specific questionnaire and a buttocks-specific questionnaire) at the 4-week post-final follow-up visit. Subjects were asked to rate improvement in treated areas using the following 7 point scale: 3 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 1 = Improved, 0 = No change, -1 = Worse, -2 = Much worse and -3 = Very much worse. Subjects who reported 'Very Much Improved,' 'Much Improved,' and 'Improved will be categorized as 'Improved'. Results were calculated as the percentage of subjects reporting "Improved".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EMS Device Treatment - Abdomen
n=94 Participants
All eligible participants for whom informed consent is obtained will be treated on the abdomen with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device.
|
EMS Treatment - Buttocks
n=33 Participants
All eligible participants for whom informed consent is obtained will be treated on the buttocks with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Improvement on the Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS)
|
68.1 percentage of participants
Interval 57.7 to 77.3
|
81.8 percentage of participants
Interval 64.5 to 93.0
|
Adverse Events
EMS Device Treatment Group
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
EMS Device Treatment Group
n=110 participants at risk
All eligible subjects for whom informed consent is obtained were treated with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device. Adverse event information was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit.
Per protocol 110 subjects were enrolled to have EMS treatments on the abdomen and/or buttocks in this single arm study. At no point in the conduct of the study were subjects assigned to a treatment group; the investigator determined the area(s) to be treated.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphoma
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
EMS Device Treatment Group
n=110 participants at risk
All eligible subjects for whom informed consent is obtained were treated with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device. Adverse event information was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit.
Per protocol 110 subjects were enrolled to have EMS treatments on the abdomen and/or buttocks in this single arm study. At no point in the conduct of the study were subjects assigned to a treatment group; the investigator determined the area(s) to be treated.
|
|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Elective surgery
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine Fibroid
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
General disorders
Coughing
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
General disorders
Cold (virus)
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sprained ankle
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
General disorders
Menstrual Cycle Irregularity
|
3.6%
4/110 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
General disorders
Soreness and discomfort in left chest
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
General disorders
Cramping in lower abdomen
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
Additional Information
Lori Brandt, Director, Clinical Trial Management
Zeltiq Aesthetics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place