Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-07-31
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is prospective, non-controlled, non-randomized, monocentric, observational feasibility study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ENDOMED: Evaluation of the Evolution of Endometriosis Lesions on Imaging Under Medical Treatment
NCT05722314
Quality of Life and Fertility of Patient With Deep Surgical Endometriosis: a Prospective Cohort
NCT03555903
Evolution of Endometriosis Lesions Followed by Ultrasound and Quality of Life of Patients: Factors That Influence Disease Progression in a Prospective Cohort
NCT07282990
Study of the Prevalence of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis
NCT06211569
Endometriosis of the Recto-sigmoid: MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Criteria Predictive of Shaving or Segmental Resection
NCT03931603
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among women consulting for chronic pelvic pain or suspicion of endometriosis, it is recommended to evaluate pain, as well as suggestive symptoms and localizers using validated quality of life questionnaires such as Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP 30).
In case of chronic pelvic pain and suspicion of a deep lesion, the assessment of disease is based on the interrogation (deep and positional dyspareunia, urinary or digestive catamenial functional signs), pelvic clinical examination by a referral physician, an endovaginal ultrasound by a referral sonographer and pelvic MRI also by a referral radiologist.
However, interpretation is not always easy with a high rate of false negatives. In case of absence of pathognomonic iconographic signs and, if there is an impact on patients' quality of life, a diagnostic laparoscopy can be proposed. This procedure can help to affirm or invalidate endometriotic lesions not visible in imaging, allowing either an excision or lesion destruction.
Although the beneficial role of surgical management in spontaneous fertility has been demonstrated, the clinical benefit of reducing pain and improving the quality of life in isolated uterine sacral ligament lesions has not been demonstrated by clinical studies with a good level of evidence.
Through this study, we would like to evaluate the functional benefit on the quality of life in the short and medium term of laparoscopic surgical management in case of suspicion of isolated uterosacral ligament endometriosis documented by standardized pelvic MRI.
All MRI exams will be analyzed blindly by an expert radiologist.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient with medical sign proving endometriotic lesion: dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia or chronic pelvic pain
3. Patient with standardized pelvic MRI realized at CHUGA
4. Patient with an indication for laparoscopic surgical treatment
5. Patient available to complete the questionnaire based on EHP 30
6. Patient available for a follow-up of 6 months
7. Patient able to understand and read French language
8. Patient affiliated to a social security system or beneficiary of the same.
9. Patient who agreed to participate to the research
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient with another deep lesion proved by MRI: endometrioma, rectovaginal septum, recto-sigmoid, urinary bladder, ureters, recto-uterine pouch.
3. Virgin patient
4. Patient with a contraindication to MRI
5. History of extensive pelvic surgery related to endometriosis
6. Pregnancy
7. Patient who did not receive laparoscopic treatment of uterosacral ligaments
8. Patient already involved in another clinical research study
9. Patient in a period of exclusion from another clinical research study
10. Referred to the Articles L1121-5, L1121-6, and L1121-8 of the Public Health Code (corresponds to protected persons: pregnant woman, parturient, breastfeeding mother, person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, legally protected subject).
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Grenoble
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thierry MICHY, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Grenoble
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Grenoble
Grenoble, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-A01143-54
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
38RC19.130
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.