Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Ustekinumab in Participants With Active Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis Who Have Not Adequately Responded to One or More Standard-of-care Treatments (NCT NCT03981744)
NCT ID: NCT03981744
Last Updated: 2025-04-29
Results Overview
Minimal improvement was defined as IMACS TIS greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 in participants with polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM). Criteria used the 6 IMACS core set measures: physician global activity (PhGA)(0-10), patient global activity (PtGA)(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8)(0-80), muscle enzymes (creatine kinase, Aldolase, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase), extramuscular assessment of myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT)(0-10), and health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI)(0-3). Absolute percent change in each core set measure was calculated as final value minus baseline value divided by range\*100. Total improvement score was calculated by sum of 6 core set improvement scores. Total improvement score ranged from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicated greater improvement. This was categorized into 3 categories (minimal \[improvement \>=20\], moderate \[improvement \>=40\] and major \[improvement \>=60\]).
TERMINATED
PHASE3
51 participants
Week 24
2025-04-29
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Placebo to Ustekinumab
Participants who received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16, then in order to gain benefit from this study participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) and placebo SC (to maintain blinding) at Week 24, followed by ustekinumab 90 milligrams (mg) SC q8w thereafter through Week 72.
|
Ustekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
Participants who received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0, ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16 then received placebo IV (to maintain blinding) and ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 24 and ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w thereafter through Week 72.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention (Prior to Week 24)
STARTED
|
26
|
25
|
0
|
0
|
|
First Intervention (Prior to Week 24)
COMPLETED
|
26
|
23
|
0
|
0
|
|
First Intervention (Prior to Week 24)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention (Week 24 to Week 72)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
26
|
23
|
|
Second Intervention (Week 24 to Week 72)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
24
|
23
|
|
Second Intervention (Week 24 to Week 72)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Placebo to Ustekinumab
Participants who received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16, then in order to gain benefit from this study participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) and placebo SC (to maintain blinding) at Week 24, followed by ustekinumab 90 milligrams (mg) SC q8w thereafter through Week 72.
|
Ustekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
Participants who received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0, ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16 then received placebo IV (to maintain blinding) and ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 24 and ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w thereafter through Week 72.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention (Prior to Week 24)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention (Week 24 to Week 72)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention (Week 24 to Week 72)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Ustekinumab in Participants With Active Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis Who Have Not Adequately Responded to One or More Standard-of-care Treatments
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Total
n=51 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.41 • n=5 Participants
|
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.62 • n=7 Participants
|
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.44 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
JAPAN
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: All randomized analysis set included all participants who were randomized in this study.
Minimal improvement was defined as IMACS TIS greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 in participants with polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM). Criteria used the 6 IMACS core set measures: physician global activity (PhGA)(0-10), patient global activity (PtGA)(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8)(0-80), muscle enzymes (creatine kinase, Aldolase, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase), extramuscular assessment of myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT)(0-10), and health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI)(0-3). Absolute percent change in each core set measure was calculated as final value minus baseline value divided by range\*100. Total improvement score was calculated by sum of 6 core set improvement scores. Total improvement score ranged from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicated greater improvement. This was categorized into 3 categories (minimal \[improvement \>=20\], moderate \[improvement \>=40\] and major \[improvement \>=60\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Improvement in International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) at Week 24
|
61.5 Percentage of participants
|
64.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: All randomized analysis set included all participants who were randomized in this study. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure for given categories.
Change from baseline in FI-2 at Week 24 was reported. The FI-2 was a functional outcome developed for participants with adult PM or DM to assess muscle endurance in 7 muscle groups (shoulder flexion \[0-60\], shoulder abduction \[0-60\], head lift \[0-60\], hip flexion \[0-60\], step test \[0-60\], heel lift \[0-120\], and toe lift \[0-120\]). Each muscle group was scored as the number of correctly performed repetitions with 60 or 120 maximal number of repetitions depending on muscle group. The FI-2 was performed unilaterally, preferably on the participant's dominant side for muscle groups of shoulder, hip, and step test. The FI-2 score ranged from 0-60 or 0-120 depending on the muscle group. Higher score indicated better muscle endurance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24
Change in Shoulder Flexion
|
2.92 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.672
|
6.88 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.284
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24
Change in Head Lift
|
2.00 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.331
|
5.56 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.364
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24
Change in Hip Flexion
|
2.54 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.819
|
5.84 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.184
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24
Change in Step Test
|
4.15 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.806
|
3.76 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.674
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24
Change in Heel Lift
|
1.27 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.232
|
5.38 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.315
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24
Change in Toe Lift
|
-0.62 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.422
|
10.60 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.800
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24
Change in Shoulder abduction
|
-0.69 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.589
|
9.00 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.419
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: All randomized analysis set included all participants who were randomized in this study.
Percentage of participants who experienced disease worsening up to Week 24 based on consensus criteria for worsening was reported. Criteria for disease worsening in a clinical trial were based on international consensus guideline developed by the IMACS. The worsening of disease was defined as 1 of the following criteria: Worsening of the Physician Global Activity by \>=2 centimeter (cm) on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) and worsening of findings of MMT-8 by \>= 20 percent (%) from baseline; worsening of MDAAT-global extramuscular organ disease activity (a composite of constitutional, cutaneous, skeletal, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and cardiac activity) by \>=2 cm on a 10-cm VAS from baseline; worsening of any 3 of 6 IMACS core set (PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-D) activity measures by \>= 30% from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Disease Worsening Up to Week 24 Based on Consensus Criteria for Worsening
|
38.5 Percentage of participants
|
28.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: All randomized analysis set included all participants who were randomized in this study.
Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 24 was reported. Manual Muscle Testing was a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. MMT-8 total score ranged from 0-80, where maximal score was sum of scores from 8 muscle groups (Deltoid middle \[left/right\], Biceps brachii \[left/right\], Gluteus maximus \[left/right\], Gluteus medius \[left/right\], Quadriceps \[left/right\], Wrist extensors \[left/right\], Ankle dorsiflexors \[left/right\], Neck flexors \[axial\]) and each muscle group was scored on a 0 to 10-point scale. The sides (right or left) used for calculating the total score. Higher score indicated greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 Score at Week 24
|
5.27 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.647
|
5.88 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.207
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: All randomized analysis set included all participants who were randomized in this study.
Change from baseline in PhGA at Week 24 was reported. Physician Global Activity was a partially validated tool to measure the global evaluation by the physician of the participant's overall disease activity at the time of assessment using a 0-10 cm VAS, where 0 cm= no evidence of disease activity and 10 cm= extremely active or severe disease activity. Negative values indicated improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Activity (PhGA) at Week 24
|
-1.15 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.623
|
-1.22 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.193
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: All randomized analysis set included all participants who were randomized in this study.
Change from baseline in extramuscular assessment by MDAAT at Week 24 was reported. This validated tool measure the degree of disease activity of extramuscular organ systems and muscle on a 0-10 cm VAS. Extramuscular activity ranged between 0 and 10 via VAS where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Extramuscular Assessment by Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 24
|
-0.68 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.645
|
-1.02 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.437
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: All randomized analysis set included all participants who were randomized in this study. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure for given categories.
Change from baseline in muscle enzyme levels (creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase) at Week 24 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Ustekinumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Muscle Enzyme Levels at Week 24
Lactate Dehydrogenase
|
-10.77 Enzyme units per liter (Enzyme U/L)
Standard Deviation 68.577
|
-0.67 Enzyme units per liter (Enzyme U/L)
Standard Deviation 64.513
|
|
Change From Baseline in Muscle Enzyme Levels at Week 24
Creatine Kinase
|
140.42 Enzyme units per liter (Enzyme U/L)
Standard Deviation 365.562
|
134.80 Enzyme units per liter (Enzyme U/L)
Standard Deviation 498.102
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Placebo to Ustekinumab
Ustekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 participants at risk
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Placebo to Ustekinumab
n=26 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16, then in order to gain benefit from this study participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) and placebo SC (to maintain blinding) at Week 24, followed by ustekinumab 90 milligrams (mg) SC q8w thereafter through Week 72.
|
Ustekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
n=25 participants at risk
Participants who received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0, ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16 then received placebo IV (to maintain blinding) and ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 24 and ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w thereafter through Week 72.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large Intestine Polyp
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pneumatosis Intestinalis
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral Disc Protrusion
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Polymyositis
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral Infarction
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety Disorder
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Failure
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 participants at risk
Participants received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, then placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16.
|
Placebo to Ustekinumab
n=26 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo (matching to ustekinumab) intravenously (IV) at Week 0, placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) at Weeks 8 and 16, then in order to gain benefit from this study participants received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) and placebo SC (to maintain blinding) at Week 24, followed by ustekinumab 90 milligrams (mg) SC q8w thereafter through Week 72.
|
Ustekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
n=25 participants at risk
Participants who received body weight-range based IV dose of ustekinumab 6 mg/kg at Week 0, ustekinumab 90 mg as SC injection at Weeks 8 and 16 then received placebo IV (to maintain blinding) and ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 24 and ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w thereafter through Week 72.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron Deficiency Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous Floaters
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental Caries
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
15.4%
4/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema Peripheral
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Vaccination Site Reaction
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
15.4%
4/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
16.0%
4/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Creatine Phosphokinase Increased
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte Count Decreased
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
12.0%
3/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
12.0%
3/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Polymyositis
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
16.0%
4/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatomyositis
|
15.4%
4/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperkeratosis
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Up to Week 88
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (partial or complete, intravenously \[IV\] or subcutaneously \[SC\]) of study agent.
|
Additional Information
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PORTFOLIO LEADER
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER