G-EO Gait Rehabilitation Training in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT03980145

Last Updated: 2022-02-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-02

Study Completion Date

2020-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The logistic advantages and advanced training capabilities of the G-EO System, as well as the benefits reported in other populations, support this strategy as a potentially potent rehabilitation tool for restoring and maintaining function in progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS). This approach represents a paradigm shifting opportunity for improving current clinical practices for patients with progressive MS. If successful, this project will provide initial evidence for increasing patient access to the G-EO System, and this could be accomplished through "regional technology centers" using a rural health-delivery approach.

There are several novel aspects of the proposed trial: (1) the examination of a novel gait rehabilitation stimulus (G-EO System) that could alter current clinical practices; (2) the focus on patients with progressive MS who have gait impairment (i.e., those who have received minimal research attention), which was recently described as the greatest therapeutic challenge facing the MS community; and (3) a study design that accounts for standard therapy.

Specific Aims: The investigators designed a single-blinded, randomized pilot trial of electromechanically-assisted gait training using the G-EO System in patients with progressive MS with gait disability (EDSS=4.0-7.5).

Specific Aim 1 will establish the safety and feasibility of gait training using the G-EO System.

Specific Aim 2 will determine the efficacy of gait training using the G-EO System for improving mobility, symptomatic, quality of life, and participatory outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Physical Therapy

Conventional physical therapy (CPT): CPT sessions will involve a 3-5 minute warm-up, stretching, progressive strength training exercises, and gait and balance training.40-43 Additional strategies for home exercises, energy conservation, fall prevention, and appropriate assistive devices (i.e., orthotics) will be provided.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Physical Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional physical therapy (CPT): CPT sessions will involve a 3-5 minute warm-up, stretching, progressive strength training exercises, and gait and balance training. Additional strategies for home exercises, energy conservation, fall prevention, and appropriate assistive devices (i.e., orthotics) will be provided.

End-Effector Robotic Training

G-EO training: Using the G-EO System, participants will be secured with the appropriate sized harness and attached to an overhead body-weight support system, with feet secured to pressure sensitive footplates. Each session will begin with a 3-5 minute warm-up in the continuous passive mode (cadence \~40-45 steps/minute). The participant will then be transitioned into the adaptive training phase for practicing repetitive floor walking and stair climbing for up to 30 minutes. During this phase, the force produced by the robot is modulated to support the effort of the patient in producing a typical walking pattern.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

G-EO System (Reha Technology AG: Olten, Switzerland)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Electromechanically-assisted gait training addresses many of the limitations of therapist-assisted gait training and can be performed using either exoskeleton or end-effector devices. Exoskeleton devices involve programmable drives or passive elements which physically move the lower limbs, whereas, end-effector approaches involve driven footplates that have trajectories that simulate the stance and swing phases.13,14 The G-EO System (Reha Technology: Olten, Switzerland) is a novel end-effector gait training system that was developed for regaining mobility and independence in stroke survivors. This system involves minimal therapist and patient burden (e.g., quick set-up, single operate usage), there is the unique capacity for practicing walking and stair climbing movements, and the patient can receive real-time visual feedback.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

G-EO System (Reha Technology AG: Olten, Switzerland)

Electromechanically-assisted gait training addresses many of the limitations of therapist-assisted gait training and can be performed using either exoskeleton or end-effector devices. Exoskeleton devices involve programmable drives or passive elements which physically move the lower limbs, whereas, end-effector approaches involve driven footplates that have trajectories that simulate the stance and swing phases.13,14 The G-EO System (Reha Technology: Olten, Switzerland) is a novel end-effector gait training system that was developed for regaining mobility and independence in stroke survivors. This system involves minimal therapist and patient burden (e.g., quick set-up, single operate usage), there is the unique capacity for practicing walking and stair climbing movements, and the patient can receive real-time visual feedback.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Physical Therapy

Conventional physical therapy (CPT): CPT sessions will involve a 3-5 minute warm-up, stretching, progressive strength training exercises, and gait and balance training. Additional strategies for home exercises, energy conservation, fall prevention, and appropriate assistive devices (i.e., orthotics) will be provided.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Electromechanically-assisted gait training Robotic end-effector gait training system

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-64 years
* Confirmed diagnosis of Primary or Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (this will be confirmed by the referring physician)
* EDSS 4.0-7.522
* Stable course of disease-modifying therapy over the past 6 months
* Asymptomatic (i.e., no underlying cardiovascular disease)
* Physician approval for exercise
* Willingness to visit the IU Health Neurosciences Center for testing and training

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Current use of dalfampridine (Ampyra®)
* Conventional physical therapy or G-EO training within the past 6 months
* Height \<1m or \>2m
* Body weight \>150 kg
* Contraindications to G-EO gait training (e.g., bone instability)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Ottawa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peter Altenburger

Associate Professor, Health and Rehabilitation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Altenburger, PhD, PT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Neurorehabilitation and Robotics at IU Health Neuroscience Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1701909134

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Multicenter Rehabilitation Study in Acute Stroke
NCT00849303 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Robotic Exoskeleton Assisted Gait Post Stroke
NCT04309305 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE1