Geriatric Core Dataset (G-CODE) for Clinical Research in Elderly Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT03976531

Last Updated: 2021-01-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-01

Study Completion Date

2017-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Older adults with cancer remain underrepresented in cancer clinical trials that establish new standards of care. Geriatric assessment (GA) is defined by geriatricians as a multidimensional interdisciplinary assessment of the general health stat us of the older patient, reviewing the medical, psychosocial, functional and environmental domains. For each domain, several tools are available, but consensus is lacking on which tool to use and the optimal cut-offs or threshold scores. The literature supports the prognostic value of the GA and its utility in weighing the benefits and risks of cancer treatments in older adults. However, GA has not been implemented in routine oncology practice or in cancer clinical trials.

The objective of this project is to develop a set of geriatric data, the Geriatric Core Dataset (G-CODE), to be collected in cancer trials of older patients. The methods rely on a consensus process involving international experts in the field of oncology and geriatrics.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although cancer is prevalent in the older segment of the population, older adults with cancer remain underrepresented in cancer clinical trials that establish new standards of care. As a result, robust data on the benefit/risk balance are lacking for many treatment strategies in these patients.

Ageing is a heterogeneous process that stresses the clinical need to identify comorbid conditions and ageing-related physiologic changes, both well-known factors increasing the risk of treatment side-effects and poor outcomes.

Geriatric assessment (GA) is defined by geriatricians as a multidimensional interdisciplinary assessment of the general health stat us of the older patient, reviewing the medical, psychosocial, functional and environmental domains. For each domain, several tools are available, but consensus is lacking on which tool to use and the optimal cut-offs or threshold scores. The literature supports the prognostic value of the GA and its utility in weighing the benefits and risks of cancer treatments in older adults. However, GA has not been implemented in routine oncology practice or in cancer clinical trials.

In 2011, after a workshop on clinical trial methodology in older adults with cancer, the Elderly Task Force of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) recommended the use of a standardised minimum data set (minDS) for assessing the global health and functional status of older populations. This minDS consisted of the G8 screening tool, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Following a consensus approach, a panel of 14 geriatricians from oncology clinics identified seven domains of importance in geriatric assessment. Based on the international recommendations, geriatricians selected the mostly commonly used tools/items for geriatric assessment by domain. The Geriatric Core Dataset (G-CODE) was progressively developed according to RAND appropriateness ratings and feedback during three successive Delphi rounds. The face validity of the G-CODE was assessed with two large panels of health professionals (55 national and 42 international experts) involved both in clinical practice and cancer trials.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Elderly cancer patients included in randomized controlled trials

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* cancer specialists (medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, geriatricians, disease-oriented oncologists, clinical oncologists)
* clinical research associates
* nurses.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Plate-forme PACAN (Elderly and Cancer Platform)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

European Georges Pompidou Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut Curie

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Leon Berard

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut Claudius Regaud

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Avicenne

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Göteborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut Bergonié

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier, MD/PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Bergonié

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Paillaud E, Soubeyran P, Caillet P, Cudennec T, Brain E, Terret C, Etchepare F, Mourey L, Aparicio T, Pamoukdjian F, Audisio RA, Rostoft S, Hurria A, Bellera C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S; G-CODE collaborators. Multidisciplinary development of the Geriatric Core Dataset for clinical research in older patients with cancer: A French initiative with international survey. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.137. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30212804 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IB2017-GCODE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study Human Digital Support Transitional Care
NCT06354166 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA