Study of Electrical Prognostic Factors of Response to Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

NCT ID: NCT03967899

Last Updated: 2022-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-17

Study Completion Date

2021-10-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (PIDC) is an acquired dysimmune polyneuropathy whose prevalence is estimated to be between 1 to 4 per 100,000 depending on the study, with an incidence of less than 1 per 100,000 per year. The clinical presentation of PIDC is heterogeneous, characterized by a symmetrical lesion predominating generally on large fibers, the most myelinated, responsible for ataxia and a motor deficit in the foreground. In the typical form, patients describe a proximal and distal motor or sensory deficit associated with isflexia that signifies a peripheral neurogenic syndrome.

The physiopathological hypothesis is that of an inflammation responsible for demyelinating nerve fibers, which results in electroneuromyogram (ENMG) by conduction abnormalities and histologically when a neuromuscular biopsy is performed by segmental demyelination.

Given the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation, electrical diagnostic criteria are proposed by the European Federation of Neurological Society in order to classify IPDCs into three categories: certain, probable and possible. In the absence of sufficient criteria to make the diagnosis of IPDC, it is also possible to use criteria of support, using a paraclinical report including the presence of an increase in protein (hyperproteinorachie) without cells for cerebrospinal fluid analysis, visualization of radicular inflammation on imaging (MRI of lumbar and / or brachial plexus), proximal peripheral involvement with somatosensory evoked potentials.

Therapeutically, a joint management between rehabilitation and the introduction of a background treatment allows the clinical improvement of certain patients. To date, the treatments proposed in first intention are corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and plasma exchanges. In fact, the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins has been widely shown by controlled and randomized therapeutic trials. Efficacy studies of IVIg in the literature are most often based on an assessment of clinical response after 24 weeks, but in clinical practice the response to treatment and continuation of treatment is often evaluated after 3 courses of treatment with the help of a clinical evaluation and the realization of an electroneuromyogram. These are administered in day hospitalization or traditional hospitalization, every four weeks, to patients whose diagnosis of PIDC has been established by electroneuromyogram according to the EFNS criteria.

Clinical prognostic factors for good response to IVIG therapy have been described in previous studies, including subacute disease, symmetrical involvement, and absence of amyotrophy.

In order to optimize the management of IPDCs, it is important to identify patients who respond to IVIg. Thus, the objective of our study is to look at the electroneuromyogram, the presence of electrical predictors of good response to treatment with IVIg.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients whose age is ≥ 18 years
* Patients with IPDC
* Patients hospitalized in a traditional hospital ward or week hospital or day hospital
* Patients who received at least 3 courses of IVIG under IPDC between January 2014 and March 2019
* Francophone patients

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under guardianship or curatorship
* Patients deprived of their liberty
* Patients who oppose the use of their data for this research
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pauline REACH, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRONELEC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.