Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Evaluation of Etafilcon A Contact Lenses Using a Novel Manufacturing Technology (NCT NCT03962790)
NCT ID: NCT03962790
Last Updated: 2020-08-12
Results Overview
Overall comfort score was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (standard deviation \[SD\] 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. A 5-point increase in an average CLUE score translates into 10% shift in the distribution of scores for the population of soft disposable contact lens wearers.
COMPLETED
NA
95 participants
1-Week Follow-up
2020-08-12
Participant Flow
A total of 95 participants were enrolled in this study however one participant was never randomized due to screen failure therefore, 94 participants were randomized to receive study drug.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Test/Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the Test lens during the first period and then received the control lens during the second period.
|
Control/Test
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the Control lens during the first period and then received the Test lens during the second period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
STARTED
|
48
|
46
|
|
Period 1
COMPLETED
|
45
|
44
|
|
Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
2
|
|
Period 2
STARTED
|
45
|
44
|
|
Period 2
COMPLETED
|
45
|
44
|
|
Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Test/Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the Test lens during the first period and then received the control lens during the second period.
|
Control/Test
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the Control lens during the first period and then received the Test lens during the second period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
|
Period 1
Failed to meet all eligibility criteria
|
1
|
1
|
|
Period 1
No Longer Meets Eligibility Criteria
|
1
|
0
|
|
Period 1
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Evaluation of Etafilcon A Contact Lenses Using a Novel Manufacturing Technology
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall Set
n=94 Participants
All subjects dispensed a study lens.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.29 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1-Week Follow-upPopulation: All subjects who had successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol.
Overall comfort score was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (standard deviation \[SD\] 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. A 5-point increase in an average CLUE score translates into 10% shift in the distribution of scores for the population of soft disposable contact lens wearers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A Test for Novel
n=89 Participants
Subjects who wore the Test lens made with a novel manufacturing technology in either the first or second period of the study.
|
Etafilcon A Control for Current
n=89 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens made with the current manufacturing technology in either the first or second period of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Comfort Score
|
56.52 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.631
|
55.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.567
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1-Week Follow-upPopulation: All subjects who had successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol.
Overall quality of vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. A 5-point increase in an average CLUE score translates into 10% shift in the distribution of scores for the population of soft disposable contact lens wearers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A Test for Novel
n=89 Participants
Subjects who wore the Test lens made with a novel manufacturing technology in either the first or second period of the study.
|
Etafilcon A Control for Current
n=89 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens made with the current manufacturing technology in either the first or second period of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Vision Score
|
61.65 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.161
|
62.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.670
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1-Week follow-upPopulation: All subjects who had successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol.
Visual acuity measured via Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts (logMAR) can take on any possible value. A value of 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 vision on a Snellen Scale. Lower values indicate better visual performance. The average visual performance is reported for each lens type on high contrast dim light and low contrast bright light.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A Test for Novel
n=178 Eyes
Subjects who wore the Test lens made with a novel manufacturing technology in either the first or second period of the study.
|
Etafilcon A Control for Current
n=178 Eyes
Subjects that wore the Control lens made with the current manufacturing technology in either the first or second period of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
LogMAR Visual Performance Scale
High Contrast Dim
|
-0.018 logMAR units
Standard Deviation 0.1276
|
-0.017 logMAR units
Standard Deviation 0.1173
|
|
LogMAR Visual Performance Scale
Low Contrast Bright
|
0.022 logMAR units
Standard Deviation 0.0915
|
0.024 logMAR units
Standard Deviation 0.0924
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1-Week follow-upPopulation: All subjects who had successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol.
Average daily wear time was calculated as the number of hours between participants reported time of insertion and time of removal of the study lenses, on an average day, at 1-Week follow-up evaluation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A Test for Novel
n=89 Participants
Subjects who wore the Test lens made with a novel manufacturing technology in either the first or second period of the study.
|
Etafilcon A Control for Current
n=89 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens made with the current manufacturing technology in either the first or second period of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Daily Wear Time
|
14.22 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.937
|
14.16 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.866
|
Adverse Events
Etafilcon A Test for Novel
Etafilcon A Control for Current
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Brian Pall, Director Clinical Science, Vision Care
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60