Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-08-01
2023-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating the Optimal Volume Voided for Passage of a Backfill-Assisted Voiding Trial Following Urogynecologic Surgery
NCT05820139
Pilot: Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder
NCT02671747
Clinical Investigation to Assess a New Artificial Urinary Sphincter to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Women
NCT05828979
Superficial Peroneal Nerve Neuromodulation for Non-Obstructive Urinary Retention
NCT04000763
Autologous Neo-Bladder Construct in Non-Neurogenic Overactive Bladder and Urge Predominant Incontinence
NCT00594139
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients agreeing to participate will have the urinary sphincter activated 3 weeks after surgery. If there are patients that later choose not to have early activation or are found to be poor candidates for three week activation based upon post op exam, the investigator will proceed with activation at a 4-6 week time period. While there is no comparison group in the study, patient satisfaction and adverse events for study patients will be compared to historical literature.
Before the procedure is performed all eligible patients will be informed about the study at the regularly scheduled pre-operative office visit and if the patient would like to participate will be offered to sign the consent document. The participant will receive a copy of the signed consent form and be asked to an SF-8 quality of life survey and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Once consented, the patient will undergo the procedure without any changes to the normal routine. The patient's device will be deactivated at the conclusion of the procedure.
After the procedure, the patient will be discharged post-operatively (same day) and follow-up will be arranged in 3 weeks to activate the device (up to 3 weeks and 3 days after the procedure) which includes a post-operative evaluation of incisions, degree of bruising, tissue induration, tenderness and accessibility of the pump. If these factors are acceptable and pump mechanics are normal, the artificial sphincter will be activated and the patient will be educated on its proper use. Additional follow up will include the regular 6 week visit, a visit at 3 months, and then every 6 months for a total of 1 year unless issues arise that necessitates deviation. At each visit, patients will complete the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the SF-8 quality of life survey.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Any patient who is undergoing combined artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prosthesis placement.
* Any patient who is a poor candidate for early activation due to poor condition at presentation or signs of infection.
18 Years
99 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CAMC Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joshua Lohri
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
joshua lohri, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CAMC Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charleston Area Medical Center
Charleston, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Joshua Lohri, DO
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wolin KY, Luly J, Sutcliffe S, Andriole GL, Kibel AS. Risk of urinary incontinence following prostatectomy: the role of physical activity and obesity. J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):629-33. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.082. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
Viers BR, Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Rangel LJ, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS. Long-Term Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes among Primary and Secondary Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantations in Men with Stress Urinary Incontinence. J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):838-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.076. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
Parrillo, Lisa.;Wein, Alan. Post Prostatecomy Incontinence. Prostate Cancer (Second Edition), 2016
Linder BJ, Piotrowski JT, Ziegelmann MJ, Rivera ME, Rangel LJ, Elliott DS. Perioperative Complications following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement. J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):716-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2945. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
James MH, McCammon KA. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a review. Int J Urol. 2014 Jun;21(6):536-43. doi: 10.1111/iju.12392. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
Lai HH, Hsu EI, Teh BS, Butler EB, Boone TB. 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1021-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.062.
John Ware, Jr, Ph.D., Mark Kosinski, M.A., James E. Dewey, Ph.D., Barbara Gandek, M.S. How to score & interpret single item health status measures. Manual for users of SF8, Lincdn, RI. Quality Metric Incorporated, 2001. 1998-2001.
Roberts B, Browne J, Ocaka KF, Oyok T, Sondorp E. The reliability and validity of the SF-8 with a conflict-affected population in northern Uganda. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Dec 2;6:108. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-108.
Moore KN, Jensen L. Testing of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) with men after radical prostatectomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2000 Nov;27(6):304-12. doi: 10.1067/mjw.2000.110623.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-556
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.