Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of OPN-375 in Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without the Presence of Nasal Polyps (NCT NCT03960580)
NCT ID: NCT03960580
Last Updated: 2023-12-21
Results Overview
Change from baseline to the end of Week 4 in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
223 participants
4 Weeks
2023-12-21
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, Twice a Day (BID)
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, Twice a Day (BID)
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, Twice a Day (BID)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
75
|
74
|
74
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
69
|
70
|
71
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
4
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, Twice a Day (BID)
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, Twice a Day (BID)
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, Twice a Day (BID)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Marked Randomized in error (patient did not receive study drug)
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of OPN-375 in Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without the Presence of Nasal Polyps
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=74 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
Total
n=222 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sinus Imaging in last year
CT Scans · 2
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sinus Imaging in last year
CT Scans · 3
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sinus Imaging in last year
MRI Scans · 0
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
215 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sinus Imaging in last year
MRI Scans · 1
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
195 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.34 • n=5 Participants
|
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75 • n=7 Participants
|
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.53 • n=5 Participants
|
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.19 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
111 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
111 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
219 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
219 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Mometasone furoate
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Fluticasone proprionate
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Fluticasone furoate
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
75 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Budesonide
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Beclomethasone
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Triamcinolone
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Fluticasone and azelastine
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Other
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Any Surgery
|
32 participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
93 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Endoscopic sinus surgery
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Balloon sinuplasty
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Polypectomy alone
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Other surgery
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Other Chronic Sinusitis Treatment History
Systemic antibiotic in last 5 years
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Other Chronic Sinusitis Treatment History
Plan to continue on saline lavage during study (decided at baseline visit)
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Smoking History
Current Cigarette Smoker
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Smoking History
Current Smoker (other forms of tobacco)
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sinus Imaging in last year
CT Scans · 0
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sinus Imaging in last year
CT Scans · 1
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
128 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sinus Imaging in last year
MRI Scans · 2
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sinus Imaging in last year
MRI Scans · 3
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
Change from baseline to the end of Week 4 in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4
|
-0.81 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.202
|
-1.54 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.204
|
-1.74 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.204
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Full Analysis Set
Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified (APOV) in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses.
|
1.19 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 1.740
|
-7.00 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 1.725
|
-5.14 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 1.742
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: Full analysis set.
The 4 individual CRS symptoms are: congestion, facial pain or pressure sensation, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), and sense of smell. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The scores at baseline and week 4 are calculated by averaging the score reported for the individual symptom over 7 days prior to the timepoint. The value provided in the results is calculated by subtracting the score at Week 4 from the score at Baseline; therefore, scores reported here can range from -3 to 3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).
Congestion/Obstruction
|
-0.26 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.076
|
-0.60 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.077
|
-0.70 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.077
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).
Nasal Discharge
|
-0.27 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.076
|
-0.52 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.076
|
-0.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.077
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).
Facial Pain/Pressure
|
-0.28 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
-0.44 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
-0.51 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).
Sense of Smell
|
-0.13 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.066
|
-0.24 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
-0.36 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set.
Comparing the distribution of time to first acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis across treatment groups. An exacerbation of chronic sinusitis is defined as a worsening of symptoms that requires escalation of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis
|
9.83 Weeks
Standard Error 0.215
|
5.00 Weeks
Standard Error 0
|
8.04 Weeks
Standard Error 0.131
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set.
The SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 symptoms and social/emotional consequences of their nasal disorder across several domains including: rhinologic, extra-nasal rhinologic, ear/facial pain, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction. Total scores range from 0-110. The score range for each domain are as follows: Rhinologic: 0-30; Extra-nasal rhinologic: 0-15; Ear/facial: 0-25; Psychological dysfunction: 0-35; Sleep dysfunction: 0-25. Each item is rated as follows: 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem, 3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be, and total scores are calculated by adding scores together. The values reported here are calculated by subtracting the score reported at baseline from the score reported at Week 24 and, therefore, can range from the negative maximum score value to the positive maximum score value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains
Rhinologic Symptoms Domain Score
|
-2.47 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.649
|
-5.25 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.653
|
-4.77 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.656
|
|
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains
Extra-Nasal Rhinologic Symptoms Domain Score
|
-1.61 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.411
|
-2.84 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.413
|
-2.45 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.415
|
|
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains
Sleep Dysfunction Domain Score
|
-1.77 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.620
|
-4.84 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.622
|
-3.61 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.626
|
|
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains
Total Score
|
-8.72 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.186
|
-19.45 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.197
|
-15.54 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.219
|
|
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains
Ear/Facial Symptoms Domain Score
|
-1.31 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.613
|
-4.45 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.616
|
-3.18 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.619
|
|
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains
Psychological Dysfunction Domain Score
|
-1.80 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.951
|
-5.81 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.955
|
-4.16 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.965
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeks, 12 weeks.Population: Full Analysis Set
Change from baseline in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Range of scores for each symptom is 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The composite score is the sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0-9. Scores reported at each timepoint are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days before the given timepoint. The values presented here are calculated by subtracting the score at Baseline from Week 8 and Week 12, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.
Week 12 Change Total Population
|
-1.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.220
|
-2.47 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.223
|
-2.60 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.223
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.
Week 8 Change Total Population
|
-1.20 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.210
|
-2.02 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.212
|
-2.19 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.212
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.
Week 8 Change With Prior Surgery Population
|
-1.28 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.347
|
-2.28 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.355
|
-1.95 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.355
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.
Week 12 Change With Prior Surgery Population
|
-1.58 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.361
|
-2.76 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.379
|
-2.36 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.375
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.
Week 8 Change Without Prior Surgery Population
|
-1.13 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.263
|
-1.86 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.260
|
-2.28 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.260
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.
Week 12 Change Without Prior Surgery Population
|
-1.51 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.276
|
-2.30 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.273
|
-2.70 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.274
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 Weeks; 12 WeeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set
Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom Scores
Change in PM Score - Week 8
|
-0.35 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
-0.69 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
-0.75 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom Scores
Change in AM Score - Week 8
|
-0.40 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.078
|
-0.76 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.079
|
-0.84 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.079
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom Scores
Change in AM Score - Week 12
|
-0.52 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
-0.88 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
-0.97 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom Scores
Change in PM Score - Week 12
|
-0.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
-0.85 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
-0.91 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12Population: Full Analysis Set
Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) scores. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in AM Score - Week 8
|
-0.39 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
-0.63 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
-0.68 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in PM Score - Week 8
|
-0.35 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
-0.66 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
-0.68 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in AM Score - Week 12
|
-0.49 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
-0.83 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
-0.85 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in PM Score - Week 12
|
-0.51 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
-0.83 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
-0.86 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12Population: Full Analysis Set
Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in AM Score - Week 8
|
-0.41 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.084
|
-0.63 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
-0.67 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in PM Score - Week 8
|
-0.41 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
-0.66 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
-0.70 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in AM Score - Week 12
|
-0.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.089
|
-0.77 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.090
|
-0.78 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in PM Score - Week 12
|
-0.53 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.089
|
-0.77 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
-0.78 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12Population: Full analysis set
Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The sense of smell scored as 0= normal, 1=slightly impaired, 2=moderately impaired, 3=absent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in PM Score - Week 12
|
-0.29 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
-0.46 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
-0.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in AM Score - Week 8
|
-0.18 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
-0.39 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
-0.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in PM Score - Week 8
|
-0.13 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
-0.35 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
-0.51 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
|
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Change in AM Score - Week 12
|
-0.32 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
-0.49 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
-0.63 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Full Analysis Set population sizes provided as overall number of participants analyzed. Subgroup population sizes provided with each set of results below.
Change from Baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT for subgroups in patients without and without previous sinus surgery. Percent volume opacified of the combined ethmoid and maxillary sinuses can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery
Patients with prior sinus surgery
|
3.89 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.882
|
-5.86 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.862
|
-6.73 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.873
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery
Patients without prior sinus surgery
|
-0.53 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.118
|
-7.83 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.129
|
-4.50 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.166
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Full analysis set
Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The total LM score for a CT scan ranges from 0-24.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score
|
0.77 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.332
|
-0.54 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.327
|
-0.33 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.329
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Full analysis set
Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification). Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-4 (sum of 0-2 for each side). The values reported below are calculated by subtracting the total score at baseline from the total score at Visit 6 (week 24).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus Pair
Anterior Ethmoid Pair
|
0.17 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.071
|
0.03 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.071
|
0.02 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.071
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus Pair
Posterior Ethmoid Pair
|
0.11 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.071
|
0.04 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.071
|
-0.04 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.071
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus Pair
Maxillary Sinus Pair
|
0.04 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.052
|
0.01 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.049
|
0.09 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.049
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus Pair
Frontal Sinus Pair
|
0.11 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.093
|
-0.12 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
-0.03 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.092
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus Pair
Sphenoid Sinus Pair
|
0.19 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.078
|
-0.04 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.077
|
0.03 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.078
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Full analysis set
Percent volume opacified of the worst maxillary sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst maxillary sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same maxillary sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.
|
-5.83 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.734
|
-14.50 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.708
|
-10.21 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.724
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set
Percent volume opacified of the worst ethmoid sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst ethmoid sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same ethmoid sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.
|
-2.79 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 1.928
|
-9.65 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 1.920
|
-6.82 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 1.928
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set
Percent volume opacified of the worst sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.
|
-6.07 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.493
|
-14.02 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.439
|
-10.75 percentage of opacification
Standard Error 2.448
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The values reported for this outcome are the change in total opacification of the left an dright maxillary and ethmoid sinuses (Visit 6 \[Wk 24\] score minus Baseline score). Each visit score can range from a total of 0-12 (sum of 0-2 score assigned for each of left and right maxillary, left and right anterior ethmoid, and left and right posterior ethmoid).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for the Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined
|
0.34 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.162
|
0.09 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.160
|
0.04 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.160
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Full analysis set
Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% for each each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal). Total score ranges from 0 to 50.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score
|
0.73 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.815
|
-2.44 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.806
|
-1.45 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.816
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Full analysis set
Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100%. Each of the following sinus pairs can achieve a total score of 0-10 (sum of score on each left and right side): anterior ethmoids, posterior ethmoids, maxillary sinuses, frontal sinuses, sphenoid sinuses. The values reported for this outcome are calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.
Maxillary Sinus Pair
|
0.17 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.200
|
-0.54 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.200
|
-0.36 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.202
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.
Frontal Sinus Pair
|
0.11 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.250
|
-0.37 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.245
|
0.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.246
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.
Sphenoid Sinus Pair
|
0.46 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.249
|
-0.32 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.239
|
0.02 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.243
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.
Anterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair
|
0.18 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.218
|
-0.73 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.215
|
-0.48 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.217
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.
Posterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair
|
0.18 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.239
|
-0.54 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.234
|
-0.41 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.236
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set
Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions with "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0=0%, 1=1%-25%, 2=26%-50%, 3=51%-75%, 4=76%-99%, and 5=100%. The total score for the combined ethmoids and maxillary sinuses can range from 0-30 (0-5 for each left and right of the anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses). The outcome values presented in the results were determined by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Week 24.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined
|
0.51 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.568
|
-1.78 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.540
|
-1.25 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.546
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions with "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0=0%, 1=1%-25%, 2=26%-50%, 3=51%-75%, 4=76%-99%, and 5=100%. Data provided for full population and with and without prior sinus surgery subgroups. Number of participants analyzed in the subgroups will be less than the total overall, as these are only portions of the total population.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations
Total population
|
-0.36 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.137
|
-0.93 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.135
|
-0.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.135
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations
Prior sinus surgery subgroup
|
-0.37 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.228
|
-0.70 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.223
|
-0.64 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.225
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations
Without prior sinus surgery subgroup
|
-0.37 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.165
|
-1.06 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.167
|
-0.52 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.168
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks, 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set.
The PSQI is a validated, self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate 7 "component" scores (each ranging between 0 and 3): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these 7 components yields 1 global score ranging between 0 and 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Week 12
|
-0.27 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.306
|
-1.18 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.310
|
-1.12 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.307
|
|
Change in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Week 24
|
-0.33 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.293
|
-2.01 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.298
|
-1.08 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.295
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 24Population: Full analysis set provided as overall number of participants. Number analyzed at each timepoint is the total number of responders at that timepoint.
Global impression of change will be assessed using a subject-completed PGIC scale range: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse. Values provided for this outcome measure are the percentage of subjects reporting a score of 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, or 3 - Minimally improved at each timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Week 4
|
37 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
|
Change in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Week 24
|
42 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, 36-item subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The SF-36v2 survey with a 4-week recall will be used. It yields scale scores for each of these 8 health domains , each of which is scored from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better health status, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Physical Functioning Score
|
0.54 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.012
|
3.46 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.023
|
2.24 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.043
|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Role Physical Score
|
0.18 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.018
|
5.02 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.029
|
3.73 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.049
|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Bodily Pain Score
|
2.46 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.193
|
5.74 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.205
|
3.54 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.223
|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
General Health Score
|
-0.20 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.010
|
4.71 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.025
|
2.78 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.037
|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Vitality Score
|
0.35 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.120
|
4.59 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.129
|
3.98 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.157
|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Social Functioning Score
|
-0.11 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.173
|
4.70 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.186
|
1.58 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.204
|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Role Emotional Score
|
-0.77 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.133
|
2.23 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.147
|
0.42 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.167
|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Mental Health score
|
-1.70 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.100
|
2.26 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.112
|
1.23 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.138
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the MCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. Result values are calculated by subtracting the score reported at Week 24 from the score reported at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Score (MCS).
|
-0.82 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.888
|
2.25 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.895
|
1.17 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.913
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: full analysis set
Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the PCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. Result values are calculated by subtracting the score reported at Week 24 from the score reported at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS)
|
2.12 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.712
|
5.35 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.723
|
4.34 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.738
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
|
-0.23 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.306
|
-0.74 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.308
|
-0.20 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.312
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed is the total number of responders at Week 24.
The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Results reported for this outcome measure are the
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=69 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=71 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=69 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
Very severe depression
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
No depression
|
52 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
|
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
Mild depression
|
15 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
Moderate depression
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
Severe depression
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
The SIT is a test comprised of 4 booklets each containing 10 microencapsulated (scratch and sniff) odors. Forced choice response alternatives accompany each test item. Each correct response is assigned a score of 1 and incorrect responses are assigned a score of 0. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of each individual odor for a total possible score ranging from 0-40. The higher the score, the better the individual's sense of smell. The test provides an absolute indication of smell loss (anosmia; mild, moderate or sever hyposmia) as well as an index to detect malingering.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™
|
0.23 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.954
|
2.63 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.959
|
0.70 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.972
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
The EQ-5D consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The outcome measured for this study was the EQ VAS, which records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled "The best health you can imagine" and "The worst health you can imagine". The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the subject's own judgement. VAS scores range from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument
|
2.10 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.889
|
9.67 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.880
|
7.30 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.891
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Full analysis set
The SF-6D is a single health state index derived from the 11 items from the SF-36v2. SF-6D scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state). The values provided in the outcome data are calculated by subtracting the score reported at baseline from the score reported at Visit 6 (Week 24).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument
|
0.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.016
|
0.06 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.016
|
0.05 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.016
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Overall number of participants analyzed is total number of responders.
Percentage of subjects indicating that they are willing to consider Sinus Surgery. This is a comparison of health economic measures and data was obtained by direct questioning of the subjects during study visits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=69 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=69 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24
Baseline
|
38 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24
Week 24
|
35 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Overall number of participants analyzed is total number of responders in each treatment group.
Percentage of subjects who meet the minimal objective criteria for surgical intervention based on completion of a surgical intervention assessment questionnaire for the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=70 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=69 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.
Baseline
|
15 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.
Week 24
|
14 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Total number of responders in each treatment group.
Outcome value presented here is the percent of subjects who are approved for surgery but no longer elect to undergo a surgery. Number of participants analyzed indicates the total number of participants for whom this analysis was completed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=69 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=69 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery
|
35 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety analysis set. Values provided for this outcome are the count of subjects with at least 1 AE in each category.
Assessment of safety by measuring severity of AEs using scale with 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=74 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)
Mild
|
13 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)
Severe
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)
Moderate
|
17 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety analysis set. Overall number analyzed is the total number of responders in each treatment group.
Assessed in nasal examination worksheet which includes recording the presence of any epistaxis, septal erosion/perforation, ulceration/erosion of area other than septum.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=71 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=72 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
Mucosal candidiasis · None
|
71 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
Epistaxis · None
|
71 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
Epistaxis · Present
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
Septal erosion/perforation · None
|
70 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
Septal erosion/perforation · Present
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
Ulceration/Erosion · None
|
71 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
Ulceration/Erosion · Present
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
Mucosal candidiasis · Present
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety analysis set
Includes systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=74 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood Pressure
Systolic Blood Pressure
|
126.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.30
|
124.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.26
|
126.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.94
|
|
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure
|
78.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.29
|
76.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.88
|
78.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.69
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety analysis set
Measure pulse in beats per minute (bpm)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=74 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse
|
73.7 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.37
|
74.1 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.76
|
72.1 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.18
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety analysis set
Assessment of safety from physical examination-weight measured in kg or lb
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=74 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight
|
77.86 kg
Standard Deviation 16.527
|
76.30 kg
Standard Deviation 15.250
|
81.14 kg
Standard Deviation 20.091
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety Analysis Set
Assessment for safety from the collection of information for concomitant medications usage. Top 5 reported con-meds by therapeutic class are listed for this outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=73 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=74 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage
Other Nasal Preparations (includes sodium chloride and sea water)
|
22 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage
Adrenergics in combination with corticosteroids or other drugs
|
15 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage
Glucocorticoids
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage
Selective Beta-2-adrenoreceptor Agonists
|
11 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage
HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
OPN-375 186 μg BID
OPN-375 372 μg BID
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 participants at risk
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=73 participants at risk
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=74 participants at risk
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 1 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal adenocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 participants at risk
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 186 μg BID
n=73 participants at risk
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
OPN-375 372 μg BID
n=74 participants at risk
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks
OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
5.3%
4/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract nuclear
|
2.7%
2/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.7%
2/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
2.7%
2/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
4.1%
3/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
9.5%
7/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.7%
5/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
4.1%
3/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
5.4%
4/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic Sinusitis
|
6.7%
5/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
4.1%
3/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.7%
2/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
4.0%
3/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vaccination complication
|
2.7%
2/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.7%
2/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
8.0%
6/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
9.5%
7/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sinus headache
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
1.3%
1/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
4.1%
3/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Persistent depressive disorder
|
2.7%
2/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
9.5%
7/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
2.7%
2/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal polyps
|
5.3%
4/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/75 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24)
Total number of participants at risk is defined by the Safety Analysis Set, which is all enrolled/randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of randomized study treatment. The number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set differs from the Full Analysis Set (total population analyzed for the outcome measures) due to two participants who discontinued the study, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Safety Analysis Set but not the Full Analysis Set.
|
Additional Information
John Messina, PharmD, SVP of Clinical Research & Medical Affairs
OptiNose
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60