Neurostimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Autistic Spectrum Disorders

NCT ID: NCT03947086

Last Updated: 2019-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-30

Study Completion Date

2019-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a clinical trial aims investigate the effects of neurostimulation in the treatment of children with mild ASD, specifically the action of tDCS on social cognition skills. tDCS can modulate neuronal activity in patients with ASD. Specifically, this technique has shown to be a promising tool in the promotion of social neuroplasticity, aiming at more adaptive social interactions. In this sense, it was hypothesized that participants treated with active tDCS will present better performance in social cognition tests than those submitted to sessions with simulated current.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that has multiple causes and very heterogeneous degrees. The main symptoms involve deficits in social interactions, difficulties in verbal and nonverbal communication, repetitive and stereotyped movements, and restricted patterns of interest. In the context of ASD rehabilitation, there is no specific treatment for autism so far, being the behavioral therapy the most used therapeutic strategy, but with still unsatisfactory results. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to be a promising technique for the treatment of different disorders, including ASD. The tDCS consists of electrical signals emitted through two electrodes in different areas of the scalp, according to the purpose of the study. The anodic current reduces the firing threshold of the neurons that are located in the cortex (that is, they increase the spontaneous firing of these neurons), whereas the cathodic current increases the firing threshold of the neurons (that is, it inhibits the activity of these neurons). Considering neuroplasticity mechanisms as fundamental in cognitive processing, tDCS becomes a promising tool in neuropsychological rehabilitation in the treatment of autistic symptoms. Previous research using protomagnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-MRS) showed lower levels of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA, a marker of mitochondrial function and neuronal density) in the left DLFPC (F3) of autistic patients, compared to healthy individuals. The findings suggest that left DLFPC dysfunction may be a component of the pathogenesis of autism. Such aspects could explain why anodic neurostimulation in F3 can improve the efficacy of autism treatment through the beneficial effects on the cognitive processes associated with DLFPC activity, such as attention and memory, executive functions, and social cognition. Social cognition can be understood as a neurobiological process that facilitates the interpretation of social signs, leading individuals to behave adaptively. In this perspective, investigations have been made that use noninvasive neuromodulatory techniques as promising tools for the promotion of social neuroplasticity, that is, the modulation of the functional and structural substrates of the nervous system associated with social cognition aiming at more adaptive social interactions.In this sense, this study is a sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial aiming to evaluate the efficacy of anodic tDCS in aspects of social cognition of children with mild ASD. Considering that tDCS can modulate neuronal activity in patients with ASD, presented as a promising tool in the promotion of social neuroplasticity, it was hypothesized that participants treated with active current will present better performance in the social cognition tests than those submitted to sessions with simulated current. Participants treated with active current will present less number and duration of fixations in the ocular tracing during the execution of the test of recognition of emotional expressions than those submitted to the sessions with simulated current. Furthermore, cognitive processes such as executive functions are essential for social cognition because they enable the individual to engage in socially relevant activities, make decisions and behaviors to achieve goals. Deficits in social cognition as well as executive functioning have been considered central elements in the understanding and functionality of people with ASD. Thus, it was hypothesized that participants who are treated with active current will present better performance in the tests of executive functions than those submitted to the sessions with simulated current. Participants treated with active current will present less number and duration of fixations during ocular screening in the executive function test than those submitted to the simulated current sessions. Considering that there were no prior data on the effects of tDCS on patients with ASD using the primary outcome measure of the present study, a formal sample size calculation was not possible; thus, it was estimated that enrolling 20 patients would be a reasonable approach for an exploratory trial. Patients are being recruited from the appointment of rehabilitators of multidisciplinary rehabilitation centers for temporary or permanent disability and global developmental disorders in Paraíba, Brazil. Children diagnosed with ASD according DSM-V, will be randomized to two groups, one with active stimulation (1.5 mA) and the other with a sham current, in which the anode will be positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3), while the cathode (reference electrode) will be placed in the right supraorbital area. The intervention will be applied for 5 consecutive days for 20 minutes. Furthermore, everyone will receive Social Cognition Training concomitantly with neurostimulation to enhance social skills in children with ASD. To control adverse effects, reports of patients with feelings/sensations of itching, tingling, burning, headache or other discomfort (1 none, 2 mild, 3 moderate, or 4 strong) will be recorded, along with whether this effect could be related to stimulation on a Likert scale; 1 (no relation) to 5 (strongly related).

The Descriptive and inferential statistical analyzes will be performed through SPSS (Statistical package for the social sciences), version 20. The design of the statistical analyzes is based on previous literature studies of randomized and placebo-controlled clinical trials using tDCS. The intention-to-treat analysis will be used with the last observation carried forward method for patients who initiate treatment and receive at least 1 session. In this way, all participants, including in case of withdrawal of the treatment before its completion, will be included in the analysis. It will be used as significance level p \<0.05.

The descriptive statistics will be used to describe the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, as well as the primary and secondary outcomes of each group in T0. The groups will be compared using Student's t test for continuous variables, or chi-square, for categorical variables.

The evaluation and efficacy of tDCS in all variables of the primary and secondary outcomes will be examined with mixed two-way ANOVA, repeated measures, one dependent variable and two independent variables, one intra-group (time, with 3 levels, T0, T2 and T3), and between-groups (two levels: Active, Sham). Covariance analyzes (ANCOVA) will be used to identify significant differences between groups using the T0 scores as covariables. In addition, adverse effects will be analyzed using the chi-square test.

Linear logistic regression will be used to identify predictors of response. The independent variables are: tDCS active and sham, the predictive variables, analyzed one at a time, will be: age and severity of symptoms. Patients will undergo three social cognitive assessments: at baseline, week 2 (after stimulation), and 1 month later. Adverse effects will be computed at each session. Thus, this clinical trial aims to investigate the combined effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and social cognition training in improving the social skills of children with ASD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Autistic Disorders Spectrum

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

this study is a sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial aiming to evaluate the efficacy of anodic TDCS in aspects of social cognition of children between 8 and 12 years old with mild ASD. In total there will be 16 children, diagnosed with ASD according DSM-V, will be randomized to two groups, one with active stimulation (1.5 mA) and the other with a placebo current, in which the anode will be positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3), while the cathode (reference electrode) will be placed in the right supraorbital area. The intervention will be applied for 5 consecutive days for 20 minutes. Participants and investigators will be blinded. Furthermore, everyone will receive Social Cognition Training concomitantly with neurostimulation to enhance social skills in children with ASD. Patients will undergo three social cognitive assessments: at baseline, week 2 (after stimulation), and 1 month later (follow up).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Participants enrolled in the study using the eligibility criteria will be allocated randomly, with 1: 1 block exchange. A random number generator will be used through an online randomization program (www.random.org). Hidden allocation will be employed with numbered, opaque and sealed sequential envelopes, so that the person in charge of the allocation will not have contact with the patients, nor with the work of the others.

In addition, all examiners will be blind as to the type of treatment the patient will receive (active stimulation or sham-controlled), which will be done by a specific investigator. The protocol for simulated current is identical, but the device ceases to emit current after 30 seconds of initiation of pacing. In this way, the effects of the active stimulation by short stimulation period are simulated, without inducing clinical effects. These factors characterize this trial as a double-blind study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active TDCS Group

Participants will receive active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) (1.5 mA). Furthermore, everyone will receive Social Cognition Training concomitantly with neurostimulation to enhance social skills.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS)- Active

Intervention Type DEVICE

A constant current stimulator (TCT Research Limited) will be used using electrodes of 5 × 5 cm2 embedded in saline (0.9 % NaCl) and application of 1.5 mA current for 20 minutes for 5 consecutive days. The cathode will be positioned in the right supra-orbital region, and while the anode will have the following provision in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3).

Cognitive Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Considering that the effects of TDCS are potentiated when applied during the execution of a task (online) (Miniussi, \& Ruzzoli, 2013), in the present study all participants received cognitive training, performed concomitantly with neurostimulation.

Cognitive training consists of two parts: standardized tasks directed to social cognition and activities that stimulate executive functions. The first part consists of tasks contained in a battery of social games (Gao \& Maurer, 2009; Dillon, Kannan, Dean, Spelke, \& Duflo, 2017). While the tasks directed to the executive domain are, namely: running mazes, assembling figures, completing parts of figures and the Super Lynx Memory Game. All participants, regardless of whether they underwent active or simulated stimulation, received cognitive training, respecting the ethical principles of ensuring therapeutic assistance to those involved.

Sham tDCS Group

Participants will receive sham TDCS. The protocol is identical for placebo stimulation, but the current will stop after 30 seconds from the start of stimulation. Furthermore, everyone will receive Social Cognition Training concomitantly with neurostimulation to enhance social skills.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS)- Sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

The protocol for participants receiving simulated current is identical, but the device ceases to emit current after 30 seconds of initiation of pacing.

Cognitive Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Considering that the effects of TDCS are potentiated when applied during the execution of a task (online) (Miniussi, \& Ruzzoli, 2013), in the present study all participants received cognitive training, performed concomitantly with neurostimulation.

Cognitive training consists of two parts: standardized tasks directed to social cognition and activities that stimulate executive functions. The first part consists of tasks contained in a battery of social games (Gao \& Maurer, 2009; Dillon, Kannan, Dean, Spelke, \& Duflo, 2017). While the tasks directed to the executive domain are, namely: running mazes, assembling figures, completing parts of figures and the Super Lynx Memory Game. All participants, regardless of whether they underwent active or simulated stimulation, received cognitive training, respecting the ethical principles of ensuring therapeutic assistance to those involved.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS)- Active

A constant current stimulator (TCT Research Limited) will be used using electrodes of 5 × 5 cm2 embedded in saline (0.9 % NaCl) and application of 1.5 mA current for 20 minutes for 5 consecutive days. The cathode will be positioned in the right supra-orbital region, and while the anode will have the following provision in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS)- Sham

The protocol for participants receiving simulated current is identical, but the device ceases to emit current after 30 seconds of initiation of pacing.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cognitive Training

Considering that the effects of TDCS are potentiated when applied during the execution of a task (online) (Miniussi, \& Ruzzoli, 2013), in the present study all participants received cognitive training, performed concomitantly with neurostimulation.

Cognitive training consists of two parts: standardized tasks directed to social cognition and activities that stimulate executive functions. The first part consists of tasks contained in a battery of social games (Gao \& Maurer, 2009; Dillon, Kannan, Dean, Spelke, \& Duflo, 2017). While the tasks directed to the executive domain are, namely: running mazes, assembling figures, completing parts of figures and the Super Lynx Memory Game. All participants, regardless of whether they underwent active or simulated stimulation, received cognitive training, respecting the ethical principles of ensuring therapeutic assistance to those involved.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of ASD
* Degree of mild autistic symptomatology
* Normal or corrected acuity.

Exclusion Criteria

* Intellectual deficits
* Cardiac pacemaker or implanted metallic or electronic device
* Severe neurological disorders
* Poor skull formation
* Epilepsy
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Paraíba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jéssica Bruna Santana Silva

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jéssica B Santana, Master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Paraíba

Natanael A Santos, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Federal University of Paraíba

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gabriela Medeiros

João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Amatachaya A, Auvichayapat N, Patjanasoontorn N, Suphakunpinyo C, Ngernyam N, Aree-Uea B, Keeratitanont K, Auvichayapat P. Effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on autism: a randomized double-blind crossover trial. Behav Neurol. 2014;2014:173073. doi: 10.1155/2014/173073. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25530675 (View on PubMed)

Amatachaya A, Jensen MP, Patjanasoontorn N, Auvichayapat N, Suphakunpinyo C, Janjarasjitt S, Ngernyam N, Aree-uea B, Auvichayapat P. The short-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on electroencephalography in children with autism: a randomized crossover controlled trial. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:928631. doi: 10.1155/2015/928631. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25861158 (View on PubMed)

Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo HI, Labruna L, Hasan A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27723104 (View on PubMed)

Boggio PS, Asthana MK, Costa TL, Valasek CA, Osorio AA. Promoting social plasticity in developmental disorders with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Front Neurosci. 2015 Sep 1;9:294. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00294. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26388712 (View on PubMed)

Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, Edwards DJ, Valero-Cabre A, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A, Ferrucci R, Priori A, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):175-195. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22037126 (View on PubMed)

Couture SM, Penn DL, Roberts DL. The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: a review. Schizophr Bull. 2006 Oct;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44-63. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl029. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16916889 (View on PubMed)

Demirtas-Tatlidede A, Vahabzadeh-Hagh AM, Pascual-Leone A. Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders? Neuropharmacology. 2013 Jan;64:566-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22749945 (View on PubMed)

Dillon MR, Kannan H, Dean JT, Spelke ES, Duflo E. Cognitive science in the field: A preschool intervention durably enhances intuitive but not formal mathematics. Science. 2017 Jul 7;357(6346):47-55. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4724.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28684518 (View on PubMed)

Gao X, Maurer D. Influence of intensity on children's sensitivity to happy, sad, and fearful facial expressions. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Apr;102(4):503-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Jan 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19124135 (View on PubMed)

Kucharska-Pietura K, Mortimer A. Can antipsychotics improve social cognition in patients with schizophrenia? CNS Drugs. 2013 May;27(5):335-43. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0047-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23533009 (View on PubMed)

Kuo MF, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 3:948-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.117. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23747962 (View on PubMed)

Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20633386 (View on PubMed)

Muszkat D, Polanczyk GV, Dias TG, Brunoni AR. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Sep;26(7):590-7. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0172. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27027666 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1221-6178

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognitive Control and Metacognition Training
NCT06885684 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA