Genetics and Shared Decision Making in Improving Care for Patients With Stage IVA-C Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03944265
Last Updated: 2025-04-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-08
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Tool for Improving the Shared Decision-making Process in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT06122064
Examining Clinical Trial Participation for Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
NCT05769504
Preoperative Therapy in Patients With Stages IB, II, IIIA, and Selected IIIB Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00193427
Study of Maintenance Temozolomide Versus Observation in Stable or Responding Stage III/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients (Study P05146)
NCT00632203
Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00004265
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. Use the information on genomic tumor diagnostics, provider treatment recommendations, and patient and provider feedback on the treatment decision making process, which will be used to develop materials and methods to adapt an existing decision counseling program (DCP) for use with patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) as a standard component of clinical care.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Pilot test the adapted DCP in a subset of patients to determine the feasibility of delivering the DCP session.
II. Assess DCP effects on patient treatment knowledge and decisional conflict. III. Assess treatment choice.
OUTLINE:
PHASE I: Use physician input to develop draft treatment education materials and use patient input to adapt an online decision counseling application for use in helping patients clarify treatment preference.
PHASE II: Patients complete a treatment decision counseling session/interview about genetic testing and supportive/palliative care with a qualified member of the research team in-person or via telephone. Health care providers receive a 1-page summary of session results for use in treatment shared decision making at the next office visit.
After completion of study, participants are followed up at 30 and 60 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supportive care (treatment decision counseling session)
Patients complete a treatment decision counseling session/interview about genetic testing and supportive/palliative care with a qualified member of the research team in-person or via telephone. Health care providers receive a 1-page summary of session results for use in treatment shared decision making at the next office visit.
Counseling
Participate in treatment decision counseling session
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Medical Chart Review
Ancillary studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Counseling
Participate in treatment decision counseling session
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Medical Chart Review
Ancillary studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* May or may not be candidates for immune checkpoint therapy.
* May have had 1-any number of prior systemic therapy regimens.
* If prior systemic regimen, must have progression disease at time of evaluation.
* Untreated brain metastases permitted.
* Completed pathological analysis of tumor tissue.
* Patients who have exhausted targeting therapy options.
* Can speak and read English.
* All participants must be willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
* Providers: Those who treat NSCLC patients as described above.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neal Flomenberg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JT 13163
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
18C.584
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.