Trial Outcomes & Findings for Using Digital Health, Financial Incentives, and Community Health Worker Support to Change Health Behavior (NCT NCT03939793)
NCT ID: NCT03939793
Last Updated: 2024-09-05
Results Overview
constructed by summing the number of days in the study period that the glucometer was used divided by the total number of days in study period
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
150 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
3 months
Results posted on
2024-09-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Usual Care
Participants randomized to the usual-care arm were asked to check their daily blood glucose and to continue with their usual care.
|
Digital Health
Participants randomized to the digital health arm were asked to check their blood glucose and text the value daily to a phone number linked to the Way to Health platform. To promote early motivation and habit formation, participants were entered into a lottery each day they texted their glucose values for the first 6 weeks of the study period. Each day participants texted, the lottery provided an 18 in 100 chance of winning $5 and 1 in 100 chance of winning $50. Accrued money was distributed to participants biweekly on a reloadable card.
If participants texted in a blood glucose value that was pre-established as medically dangerous (\< 60, \> 400), they received an automated text encouraging them to follow up with their provider. These values were also routed directly to the study clinician who called each patient within 24 hours to provide clinical management and coordinate care with the patient's provider.
|
Hybrid Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support
Participants in the hybrid arm received all aspects of the digital health intervention. Additionally, CHWs met with participants at enrollment and provided brief coaching using positive affect induction and attribution retraining to increase resilience to setbacks. At this meeting, CHWs explained to patients that they might work with them in the future if they needed additional support. During the first 12 weeks of the study, hybrid arm participants with low rates of SMBG (defined as 5 instances of missed readings) and/or elevated glucose readings (defined as a glucose level \> 300 mg/dL for \> 30% of days over any 2-week period) were 'escalated' to receive intensive CHW support.
CHWs implemented the IMPaCT intervention, in which the CHW used an in-depth semi-structured interview guide to get to know participants' strengths, goals, and unmet social needs. Participants' individualized goals became the basis for tailored action plans. For the remainder of the 24-week study period, CHWs provided coaching, social support, advocacy, and navigation to support participants in achieving their health goals. CHWs communicated with participants at least once per week, including monthly face-to-face contact. CHWs normalized setbacks and used positive affect induction and attribution retraining to help patients to cope with failure. CHWs also helped participants connect to long-term family and social supports after the intervention ended.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
50
|
50
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
40
|
34
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
16
|
22
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Participant declined to answer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=50 Participants
Participants randomized to the usual-care arm were asked to check their daily blood glucose and to continue with their usual care.
|
Digital Health
n=50 Participants
Participants randomized to the digital health arm were asked to check their blood glucose and text the value daily to a phone number linked to the Way to Health platform. To promote early motivation and habit formation, participants were entered into a lottery each day they texted their glucose values for the first 6 weeks of the study period. Each day participants texted, the lottery provided an 18 in 100 chance of winning $5 and 1 in 100 chance of winning $50. Accrued money was distributed to participants biweekly on a reloadable card.
If participants texted in a blood glucose value that was pre-established as medically dangerous (\< 60, \> 400), they received an automated text encouraging them to follow up with their provider. These values were also routed directly to the study clinician who called each patient within 24 hours to provide clinical management and coordinate care with the patient's provider.
|
Hybrid Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support
n=50 Participants
Participants in the hybrid arm received all aspects of the digital health intervention. Additionally, CHWs met with participants at enrollment and provided brief coaching using positive affect induction and attribution retraining to increase resilience to setbacks. At this meeting, CHWs explained to patients that they might work with them in the future if they needed additional support. During the first 12 weeks of the study, hybrid arm participants with low rates of SMBG (defined as 5 instances of missed readings) and/or elevated glucose readings (defined as a glucose level \> 300 mg/dL for \> 30% of days over any 2-week period) were 'escalated' to receive intensive CHW support.
CHWs implemented the IMPaCT intervention, in which the CHW used an in-depth semi-structured interview guide to get to know participants' strengths, goals, and unmet social needs. Participants' individualized goals became the basis for tailored action plans. For the remainder of the 24-week study period, CHWs provided coaching, social support, advocacy, and navigation to support participants in achieving their health goals. CHWs communicated with participants at least once per week, including monthly face-to-face contact. CHWs normalized setbacks and used positive affect induction and attribution retraining to help patients to cope with failure. CHWs also helped participants connect to long-term family and social supports after the intervention ended.
|
Total
n=150 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 • n=50 Participants
|
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 • n=50 Participants
|
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=50 Participants
|
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=150 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
34 Participants
n=49 Participants • Participant declined to answer
|
36 Participants
n=50 Participants • Participant declined to answer
|
35 Participants
n=50 Participants • Participant declined to answer
|
105 Participants
n=149 Participants • Participant declined to answer
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=49 Participants • Participant declined to answer
|
14 Participants
n=50 Participants • Participant declined to answer
|
15 Participants
n=50 Participants • Participant declined to answer
|
44 Participants
n=149 Participants • Participant declined to answer
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
48 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
141 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
45 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
Less than HS
|
15 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
HS or GED
|
16 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
Some college/technical school
|
15 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
College graduate
|
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Household income
<15K
|
32 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Household income
>=15K
|
16 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Household income
Unknown
|
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Employed
|
9 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Insurance
Medicaid
|
27 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Insurance
Medicaid/Medicare
|
23 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Insurance
Uninsured
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Insurance
Other
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Prior healthcare utilization, past 6 months (self-report)
Any ED visit
|
23 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Prior healthcare utilization, past 6 months (self-report)
Any hospital admission
|
19 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Postponed needed medical care
|
7 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Health literacy
|
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=50 Participants
|
1.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=50 Participants
|
2.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=50 Participants
|
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=150 Participants
|
|
More than 1 competing need
|
14 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Drug use
|
8 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Alcohol overuse
|
11 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
Adverse childhood experiences
|
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=50 Participants
|
3.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=50 Participants
|
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=50 Participants
|
3.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=150 Participants
|
|
Perceived stress
|
5.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=50 Participants
|
6.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=50 Participants
|
5.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6 • n=50 Participants
|
5.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=150 Participants
|
|
Low social support
|
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=150 Participants
|
|
HbA1C
|
10.94 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.21 • n=50 Participants
|
11.05 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58 • n=50 Participants
|
10.89 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.01 • n=50 Participants
|
10.96 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.94 • n=150 Participants
|
|
Patient Activation Measure
|
69.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6 • n=50 Participants
|
67.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 • n=50 Participants
|
65.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=50 Participants
|
67.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 • n=150 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsconstructed by summing the number of days in the study period that the glucometer was used divided by the total number of days in study period
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=40 Participants
Participants randomized to the usual-care arm were asked to check their daily blood glucose and to continue with their usual care.
|
Digital Health
n=34 Participants
Participants randomized to the digital health arm were asked to check their blood glucose and text the value daily to a phone number linked to the Way to Health platform. To promote early motivation and habit formation, participants were entered into a lottery each day they texted their glucose values for the first 6 weeks of the study period. Each day participants texted, the lottery provided an 18 in 100 chance of winning $5 and 1 in 100 chance of winning $50. Accrued money was distributed to participants biweekly on a reloadable card.
If participants texted in a blood glucose value that was pre-established as medically dangerous (\< 60, \> 400), they received an automated text encouraging them to follow up with their provider. These values were also routed directly to the study clinician who called each patient within 24 hours to provide clinical management and coordinate care with the patient's provider.
|
Hybrid Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support
n=28 Participants
Participants in the hybrid arm received all aspects of the digital health intervention. Additionally, CHWs met with participants at enrollment and provided brief coaching using positive affect induction and attribution retraining to increase resilience to setbacks. At this meeting, CHWs explained to patients that they might work with them in the future if they needed additional support. During the first 12 weeks of the study, hybrid arm participants with low rates of SMBG (defined as 5 instances of missed readings) and/or elevated glucose readings (defined as a glucose level \> 300 mg/dL for \> 30% of days over any 2-week period) were 'escalated' to receive intensive CHW support.
CHWs implemented the IMPaCT intervention, in which the CHW used an in-depth semi-structured interview guide to get to know participants' strengths, goals, and unmet social needs. Participants' individualized goals became the basis for tailored action plans. For the remainder of the 24-week study period, CHWs provided coaching, social support, advocacy, and navigation to support participants in achieving their health goals. CHWs communicated with participants at least once per week, including monthly face-to-face contact. CHWs normalized setbacks and used positive affect induction and attribution retraining to help patients to cope with failure. CHWs also helped participants connect to long-term family and social supports after the intervention ended.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Glucose Self-monitoring Adherence
|
65 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 28
|
70 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 25
|
72 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 29
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsChange in glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to 6 month follow-up assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=23 Participants
Participants randomized to the usual-care arm were asked to check their daily blood glucose and to continue with their usual care.
|
Digital Health
n=21 Participants
Participants randomized to the digital health arm were asked to check their blood glucose and text the value daily to a phone number linked to the Way to Health platform. To promote early motivation and habit formation, participants were entered into a lottery each day they texted their glucose values for the first 6 weeks of the study period. Each day participants texted, the lottery provided an 18 in 100 chance of winning $5 and 1 in 100 chance of winning $50. Accrued money was distributed to participants biweekly on a reloadable card.
If participants texted in a blood glucose value that was pre-established as medically dangerous (\< 60, \> 400), they received an automated text encouraging them to follow up with their provider. These values were also routed directly to the study clinician who called each patient within 24 hours to provide clinical management and coordinate care with the patient's provider.
|
Hybrid Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support
n=24 Participants
Participants in the hybrid arm received all aspects of the digital health intervention. Additionally, CHWs met with participants at enrollment and provided brief coaching using positive affect induction and attribution retraining to increase resilience to setbacks. At this meeting, CHWs explained to patients that they might work with them in the future if they needed additional support. During the first 12 weeks of the study, hybrid arm participants with low rates of SMBG (defined as 5 instances of missed readings) and/or elevated glucose readings (defined as a glucose level \> 300 mg/dL for \> 30% of days over any 2-week period) were 'escalated' to receive intensive CHW support.
CHWs implemented the IMPaCT intervention, in which the CHW used an in-depth semi-structured interview guide to get to know participants' strengths, goals, and unmet social needs. Participants' individualized goals became the basis for tailored action plans. For the remainder of the 24-week study period, CHWs provided coaching, social support, advocacy, and navigation to support participants in achieving their health goals. CHWs communicated with participants at least once per week, including monthly face-to-face contact. CHWs normalized setbacks and used positive affect induction and attribution retraining to help patients to cope with failure. CHWs also helped participants connect to long-term family and social supports after the intervention ended.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin
|
-0.49 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
-0.85 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.90
|
-0.74 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
Adverse Events
Usual Care
Serious events: 13 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Digital Health
Serious events: 13 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Hybrid Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support
Serious events: 14 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=50 participants at risk
Participants randomized to the usual-care arm were asked to check their daily blood glucose and to continue with their usual care.
|
Digital Health
n=50 participants at risk
Participants randomized to the digital health arm were asked to check their blood glucose and text the value daily to a phone number linked to the Way to Health platform. To promote early motivation and habit formation, participants were entered into a lottery each day they texted their glucose values for the first 6 weeks of the study period. Each day participants texted, the lottery provided an 18 in 100 chance of winning $5 and 1 in 100 chance of winning $50. Accrued money was distributed to participants biweekly on a reloadable card.
If participants texted in a blood glucose value that was pre-established as medically dangerous (\< 60, \> 400), they received an automated text encouraging them to follow up with their provider. These values were also routed directly to the study clinician who called each patient within 24 hours to provide clinical management and coordinate care with the patient's provider.
|
Hybrid Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support
n=50 participants at risk
Participants in the hybrid arm received all aspects of the digital health intervention. Additionally, CHWs met with participants at enrollment and provided brief coaching using positive affect induction and attribution retraining to increase resilience to setbacks. At this meeting, CHWs explained to patients that they might work with them in the future if they needed additional support. During the first 12 weeks of the study, hybrid arm participants with low rates of SMBG (defined as 5 instances of missed readings) and/or elevated glucose readings (defined as a glucose level \> 300 mg/dL for \> 30% of days over any 2-week period) were 'escalated' to receive intensive CHW support.
CHWs implemented the IMPaCT intervention, in which the CHW used an in-depth semi-structured interview guide to get to know participants' strengths, goals, and unmet social needs. Participants' individualized goals became the basis for tailored action plans. For the remainder of the 24-week study period, CHWs provided coaching, social support, advocacy, and navigation to support participants in achieving their health goals. CHWs communicated with participants at least once per week, including monthly face-to-face contact. CHWs normalized setbacks and used positive affect induction and attribution retraining to help patients to cope with failure. CHWs also helped participants connect to long-term family and social supports after the intervention ended.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Volume Overload
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypoglycemia
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroparesis
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Altered mental status
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Finger infection
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diabetic foot infection
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-operative pain
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ankle fracture
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteomyelitis
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Intrauterine fetal demise
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Kidney Injury
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of breath
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cellulitis
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive emergency
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Stroke
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data was collected for 6 months post-enrollment.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Director of Evaluation
Penn Center for Community Health Workers
Phone: 267-624-5465
Email: [email protected]
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place