Dysport ® as an Adjunctive Treatment to Bracing in the Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT ID: NCT03935295
Last Updated: 2024-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-03
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Little research is available concerning adjunct therapies that may be used during bracing of AIS patients. One therapy in particular, abobotulinumtoxinA (BTX) injection, has been poorly studied. Injection of BTX into the paraspinal musculature of the concave aspect of the major curve may result in a more malleable curve and thus optimize brace treatment. If BTX injections are found to improve outcomes in this way, a new standard of nonoperative care could be established for AIS patients, potentially reducing the number of patients who undergo surgery.
The aim of this study is to assess whether BTX injections (administered as Dysport® (Ipsen Pharmaceuticals)) in the paraspinal musculature at the site of the major scoliotic curve decrease curve progression in skeletally immature AIS patients who are concurrently treated with bracing. Dysport® will be evaluated primarily as an adjunct treatment to bracing.
Hypotheses
1. Dysport® injections into the concave-side paraspinal muscles will decrease the rate of curve progression, with a lower rate of curve progression in patients treated with both Dysport® injections and bracing compared with those treated with only bracing.
2. Quantitative physical and mental health scores will improve to a greater extent in patients treated with Dysport® and bracing compared with patients treated with only bracing.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Botulinum Toxin
The investigators plan to administer approximately 1000 U Dysport ® in the concave-sided paraspinal musculature of the major curve, based on an estimated total dose of 1000 U, the maximum allowable dose. The total dose per treatment session will not exceed 15 units/kilogram or 1000 units, whichever is lower. If two curves are equivalent within 3˚, both will be treated, however, the dosing (described above) will be divided equally across both curves.
There will be two cycles of injections. Patients will be treated at time 0 (baseline) and 4 months.
AbobotulinumtoxinA
Paraspinal abobotulinumtoxinA injections (compared to placebo)
Custom Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis
Non-operative external bracing for scoliosis curves
Placebo
Control patients will receive an injection of placebo specifically prepared as a control for this study. The same volumes as indicated in the "experimental" arm description will be injected.
These will be administered during two cycles of injections. Patients will be treated at time 0 (baseline) and 4 months.
Placebos
Placebo prepared by Ipsen for use as control
Custom Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis
Non-operative external bracing for scoliosis curves
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AbobotulinumtoxinA
Paraspinal abobotulinumtoxinA injections (compared to placebo)
Placebos
Placebo prepared by Ipsen for use as control
Custom Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis
Non-operative external bracing for scoliosis curves
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 10-16 years
* Risser stage 0,1,or 2
* major curve of 20°-40°
* curve apex caudal to T7 vertebra
* ability to adhere to bracing protocol
* Botulinum toxin naïve or previously treated greater than 6 months prior to study entry
Exclusion Criteria
* Current need for surgery at any level of the spine
* Treatment with any drug known to interfere with neuromuscular function
* Any other medical condition, laboratory or diagnostic procedure finding that might preclude administration of BTX
* Ongoing infection at the injection sites
* Diagnosis as either resistant or sensitive to botulinum toxin treatment of any type or to any components of the BTX formulation
* Cow milk protein allergy
10 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Sponseller, MD, MBA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Varun Puvanesarajah, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Varun Puvanesarajah, MD
Role: primary
Gabrielle Reichard, MA
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hresko MT. Clinical practice. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):834-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1209063. No abstract available.
Asher MA, Burton DC. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis. 2006 Mar 31;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-2.
Weinstein SL. Idiopathic scoliosis. Natural history. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Oct;11(8):780-3. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198610000-00006.
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA. The Evidence Base for the Prognosis and Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The 2015 Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation Clinical Research Award. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 18;97(22):1899-903. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00330. No abstract available.
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1512-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Nuzzo RM, Walsh S, Boucherit T, Massood S. Counterparalysis for treatment of paralytic scoliosis with botulinum toxin type A. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997 Mar;26(3):201-7.
Wong C, Gosvig K, Sonne-Holm S. The role of the paravertebral muscles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis evaluated by temporary paralysis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017 Oct 10;12:33. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0138-7. eCollection 2017.
Kouwenhoven JW, Castelein RM. The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):2898-908. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891751.
Wong C. Mechanism of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at risk for progression; a unifying pathway of development by normal growth and imbalance. Scoliosis. 2015 Jan 27;10:2. doi: 10.1186/s13013-015-0030-2. eCollection 2015.
RIDDLE HF, ROAF R. Muscle imbalance in the causation of scoliosis. Lancet. 1955 Jun 18;268(6877):1245-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(55)91020-5. No abstract available.
Fidler MW, Jowett RL. Muscle imbalance in the aetiology of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976 May;58(2):200-1. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.58B2.932082.
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):63-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015.
Cheung KM, Cheng EY, Chan SC, Yeung KW, Luk KD. Outcome assessment of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by the use of the SRS-22 questionnaire. Int Orthop. 2007 Aug;31(4):507-11. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0209-5. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
Schwieger T, Campo S, Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Ashida S, Steuber KR. Body Image and Quality-of-Life in Untreated Versus Brace-Treated Females With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Feb;41(4):311-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001210.
Wong C, Pedersen SA, Kristensen BB, Gosvig K, Sonne-Holm S. The Effect of Botulinum Toxin A Injections in the Spine Muscles for Cerebral Palsy Scoliosis, Examined in a Prospective, Randomized Triple-blinded Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Dec;40(23):E1205-11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001049.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Dysport Prescribing Information
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00110399
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id