Building a Healthy Temple: a Diabetes Self-management Support Program in Hispanic Faith Community Settings

NCT ID: NCT03934593

Last Updated: 2019-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study proposes to test the effectiveness of the Building a Healthy Temple: Diabetes Self-Management Support Program (BHT DSMS), a rendition of the Stanford DSMP in a spiritual context for the Hispanic faith community members. Using a holistic approach through integrating spiritual and physical health, BHT translates the Stanford DSMP in a way that may result in lasting behavior changes and improved diabetes outcomes for Hispanics with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The present study is proposing a 12-month translational study BHT DSMS to test the effectiveness of adapted Stanford DSMP in a spiritual context. A cluster randomized trial with repeated measures will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of DSMS intervention strategies among 360 adult diabetic congregants from 18 predominantly Hispanic churches in San Antonio, Texas (20 participants/church). Using cluster randomized trial design; nine churches will be randomly assigned to the Faith-Based (FB) intervention, and nine to the Faith-Placed (FP) intervention. The study will be implemented in two cohorts (8 churches for cohort 1 \& 10 churches for cohort 2). All intervention activities will be implemented over 14 consecutive weeks. Participants in the FB group will participate in BHT DSMS, which includes a Health Sermon, a 6-session Health Bible Study with cooking demonstrations, the Stanford DSMP and a Diabetes Resource Seminar delivered by two trained church lay leaders. Participants in the FP group will first attend a 7-session community health and safety curriculum as a partial attention control intervention, followed by the Stanford DSMP and Diabetes Resource Seminar facilitated by the local public health department. The primary outcome will be a change in HbA1c levels. Secondary outcomes include: changes in body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), quality of life, diabetes self-care behaviors, eating behavior and physical activity level. Data will be collected at baseline, 6, 9, and 12-months during the study period. The aims of present study are 1) To test feasibility of the Stanford DSMP in FP and FB settings through observation and documentation of the implementation process, in-depth interviews with program staff and focus groups with participants to identify facilitators and barriers of the intervention. 2) To translate Stanford DSMP in a spiritual context for Hispanic faith community members and compare the effectiveness of a FB versus FP approach in improving diabetes outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type2 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

We will conduct a cluster randomized trial with repeated measures to compare the effectiveness of BHT DSMS intervention strategies among 360 adult diabetic congregants from 18 predominantly Hispanic churches in San Antonio, Texas (20 participants/church).
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Using cluster randomized trial design; nine churches will be randomly assigned to the FB intervention (BHT DSMS), and nine to the FP intervention (Stanford DSMP).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Faith-Based (FB, BHT DSMS)

The BHT DSMD intervention strategies adapted Stanford DSMP in a spiritual context is used in this group. Participants in the FB group will participate in BHT DSMS, which includes a Health Sermon, a 6-session Health Bible Study with cooking demonstrations, the Stanford DSMP and a Diabetes Resource Seminar delivered by two trained church lay leaders.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Faith-Based (FB, BHT DSMS)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

BHT DSMS Intervention components include Health Sermon and a 6-session Health Bible Study with cooking demonstrations, followed by the Stanford DSMP and a Diabetes Resource Seminar. All intervention activities are implemented by trained church lay leaders.

Faith-Placed (FP, Stanford DSMP)

The traditional Stanford DSMP is conducted in this control group. Participants in the FP group will first attend a 7-session community health and safety curriculum as a partial attention control intervention, followed by the Stanford DSMP and Diabetes Resource Seminar facilitated by the local public health department.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Faith-Placed (FP, Stanford DSMP)

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard Stanford DSMP delivered by health professional

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Faith-Based (FB, BHT DSMS)

BHT DSMS Intervention components include Health Sermon and a 6-session Health Bible Study with cooking demonstrations, followed by the Stanford DSMP and a Diabetes Resource Seminar. All intervention activities are implemented by trained church lay leaders.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Faith-Placed (FP, Stanford DSMP)

Standard Stanford DSMP delivered by health professional

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Church eligibility: \[Churches must be predominantly Hispanics (60%) with at least 20 adult congregants with T2D willing to participate in the study. The rationale for 20 diabetic voluntary participants per church is based on the Stanford requirement of 12-16 participants allowed per support group and with an anticipated 25% attrition.\]
* Participants' eligibility: Participants will be adults age 21 and above that have been diagnosed with T2D.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children, adults under 21 years of age, and pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Diabetes Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas at San Antonio

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Meizi He

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Meizi He, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Texas at San Antonio

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Human Nutrition Lab, UTSA

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Meizi He, PhD

Role: CONTACT

210-458-5416

Leah Carrillo, MS

Role: CONTACT

210-458-7408

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Christian Umana, B.Sc.

Role: primary

210-458-7408

Meizi He, PhD

Role: backup

210-458-5416

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Welch G, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE, Schwartz CE. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995 Jun;18(6):754-60. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.6.754.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7555499 (View on PubMed)

Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10895844 (View on PubMed)

Sarkar U, Fisher L, Schillinger D. Is self-efficacy associated with diabetes self-management across race/ethnicity and health literacy? Diabetes Care. 2006 Apr;29(4):823-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1615.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16567822 (View on PubMed)

van Olphen J, Schulz A, Israel B, Chatters L, Klem L, Parker E, Williams D. Religious involvement, social support, and health among African-American women on the east side of Detroit. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jul;18(7):549-57. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21031.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12848838 (View on PubMed)

Naderimagham S, Niknami S, Abolhassani F, Hajizadeh E, Montazeri A. Development and psychometric properties of a new social support scale for self-care in middle-aged patients with type II diabetes (S4-MAD). BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 28;12:1035. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1035.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23190685 (View on PubMed)

Harris J, McGee A, Andrews F, D'Souza J and Sproston K. The national survey of people with diabetes. Prepared for the Healthcare Commission Sept 2007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lorig K. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Sage 1996.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Yore MM, Bowles HR, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Kohl III HW. Single versus multiple item questions on occupational physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3(1), 102-111, 2006

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Norris AE, Ford K, Bova CA. Psychometrics of a Brief Acculturation Scale for Hispanics in a probability sample of urban Hispanic adolescents and young adults. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 18:29-38 (abstr), 1996

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/

Occupational physical activity is evaluated using a single-item question recommended by Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) .

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ADA#1-17-ICTS-029

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.