Trial of DFP-10917 vs Non-Intensive or Intensive Reinduction for AML Patients in 2nd/3rd/4th Salvage

NCT ID: NCT03926624

Last Updated: 2026-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

167 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-22

Study Completion Date

2026-01-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Phase III, multicenter, randomized study with two arms (1:1 ratio) enrolling patients with AML relapsed/refractory after 2, 3, or 4 prior induction regimens:

Experimental arm: DFP-10917 14-day continuous intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 6 mg/m²/day followed by a 14-day resting period per 28-day cycles.

Control arm: Non-Intensive Reinduction (LoDAC, Azacitidine, Decitabine, Venetoclax Combination Regimens) or Intensive Reinduction (High and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Regimens), depending on the patient's prior induction treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study to compare the rate of complete response (CR) and duration of CR, in patients with relapsed or refractory AML to two, three, or four prior induction regimens that may have included intensive chemotherapy (e.g., "7+3" cytarabine and daunorubicin), epigenetic therapy (i.e., azacitidine or decitabine), or targeted therapy (e.g., FLT-3, IDH-1/2, BCL-2, monoclonal antibody), who will receive DFP-10917 versus non-intensive reinduction (LoDAC, azacitidine, decitabine, venetoclax + LoDAC or azacitidine or decitabine) or intensive reinduction (high and intermediate dose cytarabine regimens) as a second, third, or fourth salvage treatment.

Experimental Arm DFP-10917 Dose: 6 mg/m²/day administered by continuous infusion for 14 days followed by a 14-day resting period per 28-day treatment cycle. If a patient experiences a significant treatment-related AE, the patient may undergo one dose reduction of DFP-10917 to 4 mg/m²/day x 14 days for subsequent treatment cycles

Control arm: Non-Intensive Reinduction (LoDAC, Azacitidine, Decitabine, Venetoclax + LoDAC or Azacitidine or Decitabine) or Intensive Reinduction (High and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Regimens), depending on the patient's prior induction treatment as well as the patient's clinical condition and comorbidities. Control treatment is to be selected only from among the following. Institutional practice for administering these treatments are permitted, but the dose and days of drug administration should be followed as below.

Non-Intensive Reinduction:

* LoDAC: 20 mg Cytarabine administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection, twice daily (BID) for 10 days, plus best supportive care per 28-day treatment cycle
* Azacitidine: 75 mg/m²/day administered by SC for 7 consecutive days (or 5+2), plus best supportive care per 28-day treatment cycle
* Decitabine: administered as continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion 20 mg/m² x 5 days plus best supportive care per 28 day treatment cycle
* Venetoclax + LoDAC or Azacitidine or Decitabine: In combination with LoDAC, Venetoclax will be administered via a daily ramp-up to a final 600 mg once daily dose. During the ramp-up, patients are to receive TLS prophylaxis and may be hospitalized for monitoring. Cytarabine will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 mg/m² once daily on Days 1-10 of each 28-day cycle beginning Cycle 1 Day 1. In combination with Azacitidine or Decitabine, Venetoclax will be administered via a daily ramp-up to a final 400 mg once daily dose. Azacitidine will be administered intravenously or subcutaneously at a dose of 75 mg/m² on Days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle beginning on Cycle 1 Day 1. Decitabine will be administered via IV at a dose of 20 mg/m² on Days 1-5 or 1-10, as per institutional practice, of each 28-day cycle beginning Cycle 1 Day 1.

Intensive Reinduction:

* High DAC = cytarabine at doses of 1-2 g/m²/day for up to 5 days, with a maximum total dose 10 g/m² per course
* FLAG = Days 1-5: fludarabine 30 mg/m² IV over 30 minutes, Days 1-5: cytarabine 1 2 grm/m² over 4 hours daily x 5, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 mcg/kg or 300 mcg/m² until Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil (PMN) recovery, with or without idarubicin Days 1-3 at 8 mg/m² IV daily x 3 (FLAG-Ida)
* MEC = Days 1-6: mitoxantrone 6 mg/m² IV bolus, etoposide 80 mg/m² IV over 1 hour, and cytarabine 1 grm/m² IV over 6 hrs (Etoposide may be deleted per institutional guidelines, i.e., HAM regimen)
* CLAG/M or Ida = cladribine 5 mg/m² on Days 1-5, cytarabine 2 g/m² on Days 1-5, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor 300 μg on Days 0-5 (G-CSF starts 24 hr prior to chemotherapy), and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m² on Days 1-3 or Idarubicin 10 mg/m² on Days 1-3
* Intermediate DAC = cytarabine 20 mg/m² IV daily x 5

The selection of control arm treatment will be determined by the investigator depending on the patient's prior initial induction and salvage treatment regimen(s), as well as the patient's clinical condition and comorbidities. The investigator will select the patient's control treatment from among the non-intensive or intensive regimens prior to study treatment randomization in order to balance treatment allocation between the experimental and control treatment arms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized, controlled
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

DFP-10917 Dose: 6 mg/m²/day administered by continuous infusion for 14 days followed by a 14-day resting period per 28-day treatment cycle. If a patient experiences a significant treatment-related AE, the patient may undergo one dose reduction of DFP-10917 to 4 mg/m²/day x 14 days for subsequent treatment cycles

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DFP-10917

Intervention Type DRUG

DFP-10917 Powder for Injection. Active ingredient: 4-amino-1-(2-cyano-deoxy-β-D-arabinofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone monohydrochloride

Control

Non-Intensive:

* LoDAC: 20 mg SC BID 10 days
* Azacitidine: 75 mg/m²/day SC 7 days(or 5+2)
* Decitabine: CIV 20 mg/m²x5 days
* Venetoclax + LoDAC/Azacitidine/Decitabine:LoDAC-Venetoclax ramp-up to 600 mgxday. Cytarabine SC 20 mg/m²xday D1-10. Azacitidine or Decitabine-Venetoclax ramp-up to 400 mgxday. Azacitidine IV or SC 75 mg/m² D1-7. Decitabine IV 20 mg/m² on D1-5 or 1-10.

Intensive:

* High DAC: cytarabine 1-2 g/m² up to 5 days, max total dose 10 g/m²
* FLAG: D1-5: fludarabine 30 mg/m² IV for 30min, D1-5: cytarabine 1-2 g/m² for 4hr daily x 5 \& G-CSF 5 mcg/kg or 300 mcg/m² until PMN recovery, with or without idarubicin D1-3 8 mg/m² IV dailyx3 (FLAG-Ida)
* MEC: D1-6: mitoxantrone 6 mg/m² IV bolus, etoposide 80 mg/m² IV 1hr \& cytarabine 1g/m² IV 6hr.
* CLAG/M or Ida = cladribine 5 mg/m² D1-5, cytarabine 2 g/m² D1-5, G-CSF 300 μg D0-5, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m² D1-3 or Idarubicin 10 mg/m² D1-3.
* Intermediate DAC: cytarabine 20 mg/m² IV dailyx5

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

cytosine arabinoside (ara-C)

Azacitidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Azacitidine

Decitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Decitabine

Mitoxantrone

Intervention Type DRUG

Mitoxantrone

Etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide

Fludarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Fludarabine

Idarubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Idarubicin

Venetoclax

Intervention Type DRUG

Venetoclax

Cladribine

Intervention Type DRUG

Cladribine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DFP-10917

DFP-10917 Powder for Injection. Active ingredient: 4-amino-1-(2-cyano-deoxy-β-D-arabinofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone monohydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine

cytosine arabinoside (ara-C)

Intervention Type DRUG

Azacitidine

Azacitidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Decitabine

Decitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Mitoxantrone

Mitoxantrone

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide

Etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Fludarabine

Fludarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Idarubicin

Idarubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Venetoclax

Venetoclax

Intervention Type DRUG

Cladribine

Cladribine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Histologically or pathologically confirmed diagnosis of AML based on WHO classification that has relapsed after, or is refractory to, two, three, or four prior induction regimens that may have included intensive chemotherapy (e.g., "7+3" cytarabine and daunorubicin), epigenetic therapy (i.e., azacitidine or decitabine), or targeted therapy (e.g., FLT-3, IDH-1/2, BCL-2, monoclonal antibody).

(Relapse is defined as reemergence of ≥5% leukemia blasts in bone marrow or ≥1% blasts in peripheral blood ≥90 days after first CR or CR without complete platelet recovery (CRp). Refractory AML is defined as persistent disease ≥28 days after initiation of intensive induction therapy (up to two induction cycles) or relapse \<90 days after first CR or CRp. Refractory disease for patients undergoing hypomethylating agent induction is defined as lack of remission following at least 2 cycles of epigenetic therapy without reduction in bone marrow blast status.)

Patients with a history of IPSS-R high or very high risk MDS that transformed to AML during treatment with hypomethylating drugs and then relapse following or are refractory to a subsequent AML induction regimen may be enrolled as Second Salvage AML patients. Additionally, patients with a history of MPN in accelerated phase (MPN-AP) or high-risk primary myelofibrosis (PMF) that transformed to AML during treatment with hypomethylating drugs and then relapse following or are refractory to a subsequent AML induction regimen may be enrolled as Second Salvage AML patients.
2. Aged ≥ 18 years.
3. ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1 or 2.
4. Adequate clinical laboratory values (i.e., plasma creatinine \<2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for the institution, bilirubin \<2.5 x ULN, alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤2.5 x ULN).
5. Absence of active central nervous system (CNS) involvement by leukemia. Patients with previously diagnosed CNS leukemia are eligible if the CNS leukemia is under control and intrathecal treatment may continue throughout the study.
6. Absence of uncontrolled intercurrent illnesses, including uncontrolled infections, cardiac conditions, or other organ dysfunctions.
7. Signed informed consent prior to the start of any study specific procedures.
8. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test.
9. Male and female patients must agree to use acceptable contraceptive methods for the duration of the study and for at least one month after the last drug administration.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The interval from prior treatment to time of study drug administration is \< 2 weeks for cytotoxic agents or \< 5 half-lives for noncytotoxic agents. Exceptions: Use of hydroxyurea is allowed before the start of study and is to be discontinued prior to the initiation of study treatment. At the investigator's discretion, for patients with significant leukocytosis that develops during the early treatment cycles, hydroxyurea may be administered. The hydroxyurea should be discontinued as soon as clinically appropriate.
2. Any \>grade 1 persistent clinically significant toxicities from prior chemotherapy.
3. Inadequate Cardiac (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) function.
4. White blood cell (WBC) count \>15,000/μL (Note: Patients considered for possible venetoclax-containing regimen must have WBC ≤10k/μL prior to initiating venetoclax treatment).
5. For patients with prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT):

1. Less than 3 months since HSCT
2. Acute Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) \>Grade 1
3. Chronic GvHD \>Grade 1
6. Any concomitant condition that in the opinion of the investigator could compromise the objectives of this study and the patient's compliance.
7. A pregnant or lactating woman.
8. Current malignancies of another type. Exceptions: Patients may participate if they have previously treated and currently controlled prostate cancer, or adequately treated in situ cervical cancer or basal cell skin cancer, or other malignancies with no evidence of disease for 2 years or more.
9. Patient has acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL).
10. Patients with known HIV, active HBV or active HCV infection (note: testing for these infections is not required). For patients with evidence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the HBV viral load must be undetectable on suppressive therapy, if indicated. Patients with a history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection must have been treated and cured. For patients with HCV infection who are currently on treatment, they are eligible if they have an undetectable HCV viral load.
11. Documented or known clinically significant bleeding disorder.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Delta-Fly Pharma, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tapan Kadia, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Banner MD Anderson

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Site Status

HonorHealth (VGPCC Cancer Transplant Institute)

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

The University of Arizona Cancer Center

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of California

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UF-Health Cancer Center Gainesville

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Baptist MD Anderson

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

UF-Health Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

AdventHealth Medical Group Blood and Marrow Transplant at Orlando

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rush University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Decatur Memorial Hospital-Cancer Care Specialists of Central IL

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Franciscan Health Indianapolis

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

The University of Kansas Cancer Center

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of KY- Markey Cancer Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Norton Cancer Institute

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Benson Cancer Center

Jefferson, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Tulane University

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Cancer Institute

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

The University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

New York Medical College

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Novant Health Cancer Institute - Elizabeth (Hematology)

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

East Carolina University

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Vidant Oncology

Kinston, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novant Health Cancer Institute - Forsyth (Hematology)

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Gabrail Cancer Center

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati Cancer Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Prisma Health Cancer Institute

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Avera Medical Group

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

UT Southwestern

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Vermont Medical Center

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia Health System

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Multicare Institute for Research and Innovation

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D18-11141

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.