Modified Application of Cardiac Rehabilitation for Older Adults
NCT ID: NCT03922529
Last Updated: 2025-09-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
416 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-04
2024-08-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Home-Based Exercise Program For Recovery After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT02805309
Targeted Health Coaching to Improve Physical Activity Post-Structured Cardiac Rehabilitation
NCT05773287
Get Going: Accelerometer-Based Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Frail Older Adults
NCT02635477
Minimizing the Effects of COVID-19 Hospitalization With the COVID Rehabilitation Program for the Elderly
NCT04771052
Cardiac Rehabilitation and Coronary Artery Disease
NCT06579807
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: To establish efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the MACRO-I via a RCT.
We hypothesize that after 3 months, compared to usual care, participants randomized into MACRO-I will have:
H1.1: Greater improvements in function as measured by Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Computer Adaptive Test (AM-PAC-CAT) Basic Mobility Domain (3 month changes; primary outcome).
H1.2: Greater improvements in function as measured by AM-PAC CAT daily activity domain; accelerometry; depression; frailty; self-efficacy; quality of life.
H1.3: Greater CR participation and adherence. H1.4: Greater impact on readmissions and hospitalization.
Aim 2: To examine the durability of benefit of MACRO-I compared to usual care.
We hypothesize that after 6 and 12 months (12 months will be captured as timing allows), compared to usual care, participants randomized into MACRO-I will have:
H2.1: Greater improvement in AM-PAC-CAT basic mobility and daily activity domains; accelerometry; depression; frailty; self-efficacy; quality of life.
H2.2: Greater impact in readmissions and hospitalization at 6 and 12 months (12 months will be captured as timing allows).
Aim 3: To explore characteristics of patients who benefit the most from the MACRO-I as compared to usual care.
H3.1: We anticipate functional capacity and other baseline characteristics will identify those who benefit from the MACRO-I (exploratory).
The MACRO study originally began recruitment with a target sample size of N=480 in November 2019. The primary outcome measure at this time was the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and a battery of secondary outcome measures included assessments of hand grip strength, accelerometry, cognition, depression, health literacy, frailty, physical activity, nutrition, readiness for change, self efficacy, and quality of life. However, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the original MACRO protocol. In March 2020 per Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) decision, all study participants who were enrolled at that time were withdrawn and the study was suspended to address safety concerns of face-to-face assessments during the height of the pandemic. It was necessary to modify the protocol so it could administered fully remotely, without changing the original aims and innovation of the intervention.
The SPPB was no longer feasible or safe as a primary outcome measure, so the study team selected the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care with Computerized Adaptive Testing (AM-PAC CAT). The AM-PAC CAT is used to measure self-reported daily activity, can reliably be used to detect change over time, and can be administered over the phone. It was determined that with this new outcome measure, a target sample size of N=374 would be sufficient to retain the same statistical power for the new primary outcome as the original protocol, assuming 80% retention. The secondary outcome assessments were also revised, changing to measures that could be administered remotely when needed and leaving in-person assessments optional contingent on COVID risk.
Following all regulatory approvals of the revised protocol and outcome measures, the study restarted recruitment in September 2020. Enrollment concluded in August 2023 after 416 participants had been consented and 350 randomized. The retention rate was higher than anticipated at 87.7% completion of the primary outcome measure at 3 months, which allowed for the same amount of power with a smaller sample size.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
Care after an acute heart event will be at the discretion of the participants' clinical providers.
Usual Care
Participants will receive usual care that is recommended by their providers. MACRO study personnel will follow the participant for the course of the study to assess endpoints in comparison to the MACRO-I arm.
MACRO-I
A coaching intervention that supplements usual care.
MACRO-I
MACRO-I coaches engage with patients regularly while they are still inpatients, and then by telephone once they are discharged. Coaching incorporates innovative techniques for holistic risk assessment (medical, functional, psychosocial), guidance to initiate CR in a format aligned with each patient's risks and preferences (i.e., CR as either site-based, home-based, or in a hybrid format \[site transitioning to home\]), behavioral prompts based on their personal goals of care, and de-prescribing of sedating medications.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MACRO-I
MACRO-I coaches engage with patients regularly while they are still inpatients, and then by telephone once they are discharged. Coaching incorporates innovative techniques for holistic risk assessment (medical, functional, psychosocial), guidance to initiate CR in a format aligned with each patient's risks and preferences (i.e., CR as either site-based, home-based, or in a hybrid format \[site transitioning to home\]), behavioral prompts based on their personal goals of care, and de-prescribing of sedating medications.
Usual Care
Participants will receive usual care that is recommended by their providers. MACRO study personnel will follow the participant for the course of the study to assess endpoints in comparison to the MACRO-I arm.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Eligible cardiovascular disease (CVD) diagnosis (hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction/ acute coronary syndrome, stable ischemic heart disease, revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention, valvular heart disease (surgical or transcatheter replacements or repair for mitral regurgitation or aortic stenosis),heart failure (exacerbation or new diagnosis)
* English speaking
* Able to provide written informed consent
* Able to be assessed and undergo study interventions
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of non-CVD conditions likely to be fatal within 12 months (e.g., metastatic cancer)
* Severe cognitive impairment: Short Blessed screening with a score of 13 or greater cannot consent (as indicated by medical record)
* Long-term care resident at admission with no plans to return to independent living
* Unable to participate in follow-up assessments by telephone or in person
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
University of Pittsburgh
OTHER
Daniel Forman, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel Forman, MD
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel E Forman
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare system
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY20080044
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.