Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

NCT ID: NCT03915574

Last Updated: 2023-12-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

280 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-09

Study Completion Date

2023-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare two anesthetics techniques called Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) and Standard Epidural as to which of the two can provide faster and potentially better at providing pain relief for cesarean sections. It will also compare these two anesthetics techniques on the percentage of women who require additional drugs to control pain during their cesarean deliveries. The results of this study will help anesthesiologists know which anesthetic technique can provide faster and potentially better at providing pain relief for cesarean sections.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to compare the onset time of anesthesia between standard epidural and Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) for cesarean delivery. The study will hypothesize that a DPE technique with a 25-gauge spinal needle will have a faster onset and improved quality of surgical anesthesia when compared to a standard epidural. Participants will be blinded to which group they are being assigned. An unblinded anesthesiologist will insert the epidural or DPE based on randomization. After insertion of the epidural or DPE, a low dose local anesthetic infusion will be infused into the epidural catheter up until the time of surgery. This is the standard infusion used to provide pain relief in laboring women (bupivacaine 0.0625% with 2 mcg/ml fentanyl). In this way participants enrolled in the study would mimic anesthetic the conditions of a "labor epidural".

Participants will then move on to the next phase of the study. In this phase, the epidural pump will be discontinued, and anesthesia care will be conducted in the same manner as all cesarean deliveries under epidural extension anesthesia (this refers to the process of providing anesthesia using a pre-existing epidural/DPE that was inserted for the purpose of providing labor analgesia). Anesthesia will be induced in a standardized manner with 20 ml of 3% chloroprocaine. Motor and sensory block will be tested at the end of the epidural loading dose. Loss of sharp sensation will be measured using a blunt plastic neurotip® (Owen Mumford, USA) until a sensory bilateral block to the T6 dermatomal level has been reached. The T6 level measured at the xiphoid process will be marked bilaterally with a washable marker pen to guarantee the precision of the primary endpoint (which will be assumed when sensory block goes above T6). Sensory testing will be performed from caudad to cephalad (i.e. from blocked to unblocked dermatomes) to identify the first unblocked dermatome. To identify the level where the sensation of touch is first appreciated, the investigator will ask the question: "Tell me when you feel the sensation of something sharp touching your skin." Both the motor and sensory block evaluations are part of the standard clinical care of patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia. The main difference for participants enrolled in the study is that the frequency of sensory assessments will be increased so that the onset of surgical anesthesia can be accurately documented (approximately every minute and then more frequently as the sensory block approaches the primary endpoints). A second anesthesiologist, blind to the type of block will manage the clinical care of the patient from the beginning of the study (after epidural catheter placement) and will administer the induction drug (prepared by that anesthesiologist as per SOC). There will be no difference in this clinician's care of the subject than if she were not enrolled in the study. This will assess the onset of anesthesia and manage all aspects of the subject's clinical care including the documentation of the local anesthetic (LA) solution administration timing and its clinical effects. The speed of onset will be assessed from the end of epidural test dose. This will be defined as time zero and the start of anesthesia. If required, intra-operative analgesia will be offered in the form of further epidural top-up, intravenous fentanyl, ketamine, nitrous oxide or replacement of neuraxial anesthesia/conversion into general anesthesia as the standard of care (SOC).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Levels

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

140 mother-infant dyads (280 actual participants)
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dural Puncture Epidural

Participants will receive a dural puncture epidural block with a 25 gauge spinal needle followed by a standard epidural infusion (0.0625% bupivacaine + 2mcg/ml fentanyl)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

25G Dural Puncture Epidural

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dural puncture created with a 25 gauge spinal needle

Standard Epidural

Participants will have standard epidural infusion followed by a standard epidural infusion (0.0625% bupivacaine + 2mcg/ml fentanyl)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Epidural

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control group - standard epidural (no dural puncture)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

25G Dural Puncture Epidural

Dural puncture created with a 25 gauge spinal needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard Epidural

Control group - standard epidural (no dural puncture)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Singleton pregnancy
* Gestation \> 36 weeks
* ASA class II and III
* Provides written consent
* Infant of mother
* Elective or non-urgent cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Urgent/emergent cesarean sections
* ASA and IV or above
* Unable to understand English
* Significant back surgery or scoliosis
* Lethal fetal abnormality or likely to affect APGAR scores
* Weight \> 120 kg
* Height \< 150 cm
* Allergy to study solutions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arkansas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nadir Sharawi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arkansas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sharawi N, Williams M, Athar W, Martinello C, Stoner K, Taylor C, Guo N, Sultan P, Mhyre JM. Effect of Dural-Puncture Epidural vs Standard Epidural for Epidural Extension on Onset Time of Surgical Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2326710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26710.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37526934 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

228768

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id