Outcomes of Septic Shock Patients Treated With a Metabolic Resuscitation Bundle Consisting of Intravenous Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid and Thiamine.
NCT ID: NCT03913468
Last Updated: 2021-09-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
206 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-01
2019-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Metabolic Resuscitation Using Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine, and Glucocorticoids in Sepsis.
NCT03422159
Thiamine, Vitamin C and Hydrocortisone in the Treatment of Septic Shock
NCT03540628
Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock
NCT03258684
Evaluation of Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C and Thiamine for the Treatment of Septic Shock
NCT03380507
The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
NCT03335124
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This rapidly acquired ascorbic acid deficiency leads to shock and multi-organ failure due to the fact that ascorbic acid is required for humans to produce endogenous vasopressors (hormones that regulate blood pressure) as well as to maintain the function and integrity of the endothelium-the endothelium is the largest organ in the body and is critical in regulating blood pressure and preventing fluid leakage into all organs of the body, a pervasive dysfunction which underlies "multi-organ failure". Oral administration of ascorbic acid, even in high doses, has limited bioavailability (transporter mechanisms in the intestines are limited) and does not lead to appreciable correction of the deficiency, neither in the short term, nor in the critically ill.
In contrast, intravenous administration, in high doses, rapidly achieves not only normal levels, but even supranormal levels.This critical need for intravenous supplementation to treat septic shock was first argued for in 2006 by the European Respiratory Society's "Consensus Committee on Intravenous (Parenteral) Vitamin C" a committee comprised of scientists, researchers, and clinicians studying the role ascorbic acid in sepsis/shock models from all over the world. This was followed by two randomized controlled trials in 2014 showing high efficacy of intravenous ascorbic acid in preventing death in septic shock patients. In 2016, a highly publicized historical control trial further demonstrated a large reduction in vasopressor duration, mortality and renal replacement therapy in a cohort of patients after aggressively correcting ascorbic acid deficiency via the intravenous route showing that multi organ failure and death is immediately prevented in almost all patients. More recently, he has published a study demonstrating the synergistic effects of pairing ascorbic acid with hydrocortisone--endothelial barriers are restored to a greater extent than either agent alone.
Lastly, two trials in the past two years have shown that intravenous thiamine, when systematically provided to the critically ill, independently leads to reduced mortality. Thus, HAT therapy appears to be of high utility in preventing death and multi-organ failure in septic shock. Beyond the above mentioned small, single center observational and randomized controlled trials, no other outcome studies have been done in septic shock patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Received Ascorbic Acid IV
Per the medical record, consecutive patients admitted to our institutions ICU with a diagnosis of septic shock within the last 3 years, who were treated within the first 24 hours of admission with the combination of IV ascorbic acid, IV thiamine, and IV hydrocortisone, with a duration of 4 days or until patient leaves the ICU.
Intravenous Ascorbic Acid
1.5 grams IV ascorbic acid q6h, 50 mg IV hydrocortisone q 6 hours, and 200mg IV thiamine BID administered (as documented in medical record)
Control Group
Per the medical record, consecutive patients admitted to our institutions ICU with a diagnosis of septic shock within the last 3 years, who did not receive any treatment with IV ascorbic acid.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intravenous Ascorbic Acid
1.5 grams IV ascorbic acid q6h, 50 mg IV hydrocortisone q 6 hours, and 200mg IV thiamine BID administered (as documented in medical record)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary diagnosis of sepsis listed in the ICU Patient Database
* Requirement for vasopressors within 24 hours of admission
* If outside transfer, transfer to TLC occurred within 24 hours of initial presentation
* Patient remained on Critical Care service for a minimum of 48 hours
* If treated with iHAT, iHAT started within 36 hours of admission
* No transition to comfort care occurred within the first 24 hours
Exclusion Criteria
* patients transitioned to comfort measures only within 24 hours of admission
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pierre Kory, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A534285
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SMPH/MEDICINE/PULMON MED
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2018-1310
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.