Role of Vagal Tone in Rumination Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT03912636

Last Updated: 2022-04-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rumination syndrome is a condition in which people repeatedly and unintentionally regurgitate undigested or partially digested food from the stomach, rechew it, and then either re-swallow it or spit it out. The mechanism of the disease is not well understood. The investigators believe that discomfort in the stomach during and immediately after meals may be an important factor for this disease. The reason for such discomfort can be due to an alteration of nervous regulation of the stomach. The investigators can study the nervous regulation that affects the stomach and other parts of the body by analysing in detail an electrocardiogram that is performed continuously for several hours. From this analysis, The investigators can study a parameter called cardiac vagal tone (CVT).

Diaphragmatic breathing (DiaB) is a respiratory exercise, in which people mainly move their abdomen to breath. DiaB is a common treatment for rumination syndrome. Patients doing DiaB can reduce the number of rumination episodes. The mechanism by which DiaB improves rumination is unknown. There is another type of breathing called slow deep breathing (SlowDB), in which people mainly breathe with their chest. SlowDB is used as a therapy for increased pain in the food pipe (oesophagus) and it might also be effective on rumination syndrome. The investigators believe that both DiaB and SlowDB can improve rumination, by modifying the nervous control of the stomach (that the investigators can monitor by measuring continuously cardiac vagal tone (CVT)). The aims of the study are to investigate the association between gastric discomfort during a meal, CVT variations (measured with the electrocardiogram during the meal) and the severity of rumination episodes. The investigators will also study how DiaB and SlowDB can modify this variable during the test. In a second step, The investigators will assess the clinical effect of respiratory exercises (DiaB and SlowDB) on the severity and frequency of regurgitations in patients diagnosed with rumination syndrome.

Method This research consists of two separate studies.

1. Study1 (to investigate the mechanism of rumination syndrome) 10 healthy volunteers and 10 rumination patients will join Study1 on 3 separate days. On each visit, the investigators will place electrocardiogram sensors and a belt that can measure the thorax or abdominal movement. All subjects will get instructions to perform SlowDB or DiaB, answer some questionnaires, eat the test meal, perform normal breathing/DiaB/SlowDB for 15 minutes, and stay quietly on the chair for 3 hours.
2. Study 2 (to assess the effect of DiaB and SlowDB on rumination syndrome) 10 patients with rumination syndrome will join Study 2. On the first visit, subjects will have the test meal, answer the symptom questionnaire 1 hour after the meal, and learn how to perform either DiaB or SlowDB. After the first visit, subjects perform DiaB or SlowDB during 15 minutes after every meal for 4 weeks. On the second visit, subjects will have the test meal, answer the symptom questionnaire 1 hour after the meal, and learn how to perform the other respiratory exercise. After a 2-week break, subjects will perform the other respiratory exercise for the next 4 weeks. On the last visit, subjects will have the test meal and answer the symptom questionnaire 1 hour after the meal.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rumination

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

In study 1 for the pathophysiology of rumination syndrome, the investigators will recruit 10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients. In study 2 for the treatment, the investigators will recruit 10 patients and perform the cross-over test, in which the patients will perform 2 breathing exercises and the investigators will compare the effects.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

When the investigators analyze the data, the investigator will be blinded to the conditions of the participants and the types of breathing exercises.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Diaphragmatic breathing in healthy volunteers in study1

Healthy volunteers will perform diaphragmatic breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Diaphragmatic breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will perform Diaphragmatic breathing after the test meal.

Diaphragmatic breathing in rumination patients in study1

Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Diaphragmatic breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will perform Diaphragmatic breathing after the test meal.

Deep slow breathing in healthy volunteers in study1

Healthy volunteers will perform deep slow breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Deep Slow Breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will perform Deep Slow Breathing after the test meal.

Deep slow breathing in rumination patients in study1

Rumination patients will perform deep slow breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Deep Slow Breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will perform Deep Slow Breathing after the test meal.

Normal breathing in healthy volunteers in study1

healthy volunteers will perform normal breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Normal breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will perform Normal Breathing (as a control) after the test meal as a control.

Normal breathing in rumination patients in study1

rumination patients will perform normal breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Normal breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will perform Normal Breathing (as a control) after the test meal as a control.

Diaphragmatic breathing in study 2; cross over test

Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing in randomized cross-over test. The investigators will compare the effects on rumination.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Diaphragmatic breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will perform Diaphragmatic breathing after the test meal.

Deep slow breathing in study 2; cross over test

Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing in randomized cross-over test. The investigators will compare the effects on rumination.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Deep Slow Breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will perform Deep Slow Breathing after the test meal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diaphragmatic breathing

Subjects will perform Diaphragmatic breathing after the test meal.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Deep Slow Breathing

Subjects will perform Deep Slow Breathing after the test meal.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Normal breathing

Subjects will perform Normal Breathing (as a control) after the test meal as a control.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Healthy volunteers (HVs)

* 18-65 years old
* No history of any gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in the 3 months prior to the study.
* No medications 3 months prior to the study
2. Rumination patients

* 18-65 years old
* Fulfilling ROME IV clinical criteria for rumination
* Confirmed rumination syndrome by High Resolution Impedance Monometry within 12 months prior to the study
* No history of performing DiaB as a therapy for rumination syndrome.
* No medications which may affect vagal tone, the number of rumination episodes and GI motility 3 months prior to the study. (i.e. opioids, Baclofen , anticholinergics drugs, prokinetics, beta-blockers)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women
* History of GI surgeries apart from appendectomy
* Alcohol or substance abuse, mental health illness
* Inability to obtain informed consent
* Non-fluent English speakers
* Participants with food intolerances or allergies that would not be able to take in the test meal (McDonalds Big Mac meal)
* Major comorbidities such as significant cardiac/pulmonary disease, cancer, life-threatening conditions or other life-limiting conditions
* Evidence of relevant organic diseases. (in endoscopy, CT.)
* Evidence of major esophageal motility disorders (Chicago classification ver3.0) (21)
* Known allergy to ECG electrodes or latex
* History of diabetes
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Mary University of London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mays Jawad

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Joint Research Management Office, Queen Mary, University of London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wingate Institue

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19/ss/0054

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Quinine and Food Intake
NCT03565133 COMPLETED NA