The Relationship Between Having a Positive Mindset and Exercise Capacity in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

NCT ID: NCT03912025

Last Updated: 2021-08-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-30

Study Completion Date

2021-04-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A cross sectional study utilizing congenital heart disease patients presenting for clinically indicated cardiopulmonary exercise test. Baseline questionnaires (see below) will be administered prior to the exercise test. Exercise test data and clinical data will be recorded. Questionnaire data will be compared to clinical data in and between disease severity groups. Disease severity will be determined based on hemodynamic (not anatomic) classification according to an algorithm adapted from the European Society of Cardiology.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have variable degrees of exercise capacity and levels of physical activity that is not necessarily related to disease severity (1,2) and is not fixed as supervised exercise training can achieve improved fitness across a spectrum of hemodynamic deficits (3-5). Effectiveness of training relates to frequency, intensity, time, and type of exercise as well as motivation to participate. Research in the psychology literature in athletes and in non-athletes alike has demonstrated that optimism and positive mentality result in improved exercise capacity, enhanced training results, and resilience to stress (6-11). Further, the general concept of resilience in children may be the sum result of the balance of positive and negative inputs (12), and these factors are also modifiable. The degree with which having a positive mindset impacts functional capacity irrespective of congenital heart disease severity is not known; if there is a correlation, then the idea that mindset could potentially be a target for an intervention to improve health in children with CHD is intriguing.

This study seeks to assess the correlation of positive thinking to physiological outcomes by comparing the degree of positive mindset of patients with congenital heart disease (as measured by questionnaire data to assess the balance of optimistic thinking to anxiety) with their functional capacity (as measured by peak oxygen consumption (peakVO2) on exercise testing). The ability to measure "mindset" in the clinic setting is now feasible after the recent release of a set of validated questionnaires for children (and parent-proxies) known as PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), developed under the auspices of the National Institutes of Health (www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis). These questionnaires are short (4-8 questions), free, and integrate into the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database, making delivery Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant and scoring automatic. In addition, the PROMIS measures contain both retrospective positive quality of life questions (life satisfaction, positive well-being) as well as a future facing tool measuring degree of optimism and purpose, making it ideally suited for the present research proposal. While PROMIS tools have been utilized in childhood chronic illnesses such as arthritis and kidney disease, they have not yet been reported in children with congenital heart disease. Thus, a secondary goal of this proposal is to assess the distribution of meaning and purpose scores and anxiety scores of children with CHD compared to the population norms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congenital Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mild hemodynamic CHD

"Mild" severity category will be defined in terms of hemodynamic parameters rather than anatomic diagnoses, as outlined in the European Society of Cardiology Section on Sports Cardiology consensus guidelines (Budts W, Borjesson M, Chessa M, van Buuren F, Trindade PT, Corrado D, Heidbuchel H, Web G, Holm J, Papadakis M. 2013).

They define functional parameters such as systolic function, oxygen saturation, rhythm disorders, elevated pressure or volume load, etc. to divide patients into 3 hemodynamic groups. Based on their model, we define "mild CHD" as ones falling into the group that can train at "High Intensity" exercise levels.

Relationship between positive mindset and exercise capacity

Intervention Type OTHER

No intervention. Cross-sectional study looking at the relationships between questionnaire scores and outcomes

Moderate hemodynamic CHD

"Moderate" severity category will be defined in terms of hemodynamic parameters rather than anatomic diagnoses. Based on their model, we define "moderate CHD" as those that can train at "Moderate Intensity."

Relationship between positive mindset and exercise capacity

Intervention Type OTHER

No intervention. Cross-sectional study looking at the relationships between questionnaire scores and outcomes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Relationship between positive mindset and exercise capacity

No intervention. Cross-sectional study looking at the relationships between questionnaire scores and outcomes

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients age 8-17 with congenital heart disease
* Classified as mild or moderate hemodynamic severity
* Presenting to outpatient department for clinically indicated cardiopulmonary exercise test

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients on beta blockers or negative inotropes
* Patients with pacemakers/ICDs
* Patients with active arrhythmias
* Patients with significant musculoskeletal or pulmonary disease
* Patients unable to complete a maximal exercise test or for whom an exercise test is contraindicated
* Patients who are not fluent in English
* Patients unable to complete the questionnaire
* Patients who have severely hemodynamic debilitation or at risk (severe systolic dysfunction, severe ventricular hypertrophy, severe pressure load, severe volume load, severe pulmonary hypertension, malignant arrhythmia, significant central cyanosis)
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Naomi Gauthier

Pediatric Cardiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Naomi Gauthier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Boston Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Boston Children's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P00030619

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Health Effects of Mentoring
NCT02900638 COMPLETED NA
Fitness Training in Children
NCT00205296 COMPLETED NA