PersonaLized neoAdjuvant Strategy ER Positive and HER2 Negative Breast Cancer TO Increase BCS Rate

NCT ID: NCT03900637

Last Updated: 2024-07-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-08

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In ER+ and HER2- breast cancer(BC) patients for whom BCS is not feasible, we investigate the rate of BCS can be increased while decreasing unnecessary chemotherapy thru selective neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy using tools of nodal status, Ki-67, and multigene assay(Mammaprint)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In patients with resectable BC, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recognized as one of the standard therapy in order to control and prevent the micrometastasis.

Conducting neoadjuvant chemotherapy can lead to increased numbers of BCS compared with adjuvant chemotherapy and the prognosis of BC patients is known to be improved when there is pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with no pCR.

The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different in breast cancer subtypes. The quasi-pCR in HR- HER2+ BC is reported as 67% while 37% and 13% in triple negative and HR+ HER2- BC, respectively and it indicates that neoadjuvant chemotherapy has only limited effect in HR+ BC and the declined quality of life and the fecundity loss due to chemotherapy is a serious socioeconomic loss, especially in young patients.

According to the SOFT trial, for high risk, pre-menopausal women, use of exmestane (AI, Aromatase Inhibitors) and ovarian suppression as adjuvant systemic therapy did improve the PFD compared with the use of tamoxifen and ovarian suppression.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy as well as neoadjuvant chemotherapy has benefits in making inoperable BC to operable BC and improving the possibility of BCS by reducing the tumor size with complete response or partial response. Although these neoadjuvant systemic therapies have an ultimate objective to reduce the recurrence rate and improve the survival rate, the overall survival and disease-free survival has been reported similar to adjuvant systemic therapies. The clinical response rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy ranged from 13.5% to 100%, the radiologic response rate by ultrasound ranged from 20% to 91.7%, and these are statistically similar to the response rate of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ patients. Most studies where letrozole was tested among AIs showed that letrozole has a similar or a little better effect on clinical or radiological response rate over tamoxifen and there were statistically more patients who became operable or eligible for BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Comparison studies among AIs showed that the response rates have been best achieved in letrozole over anastrozole and exemestane and the BCS rate was lowest in letrozole without statistical significance. According to the standard treatment guideline suggesting the selective use of ovarian suppression along with tamoxifen in HR+, premenopausal patients, a study investigated the combined treatment of letrozole with reversible ovarian ablation using goserelin (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: LHRH). The results showed that the response rate of the combination treatment of goserelin and anastrozole for 24 weeks as neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was statistically superior to goserelin and tamoxifen in premenopausal BC patients and this was not observed in the adjuvant setting. The most commonly used agents in BC are goserelin and leuprorelin(Leuplin) and their mechanism of action is to desensitize the hypothalamus and suppress the ovarian function by reducing the secretion of LH and FSH.

MammaPrint, which analyses 70-gene expressed in breast cancer, can identify low risk patients who may safely forgo chemotherapy and high risk patients who can benefit from chemotherapy. Recent results from MINDACT trial have proved that 46.2% of HR+ and clinical high risk patients were classified into MammaPrint low risk and they could avoid unnecessary chemotherapy. In 2017 San Antonio breast cancer symposium, Dubsky et al. reported the analysis of correlation between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and score of Endopredict(EP) multigene assay in ER+ and HER2- patients treated on ABCSG 34. In neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, reduction of tumor size in patients with low EP score(Endopredict low risk group) was significantly low(NPV 100%). Meanwhile, in neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group, reduction of tumor size in patients with high EP score(Endopredict high risk group) was significantly low(NPV 92%). These results support the evidence that response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy can be predicted by the molecular score of tumor and selective treatment can maximize the effect.

Accordingly, in this study, patients with MammaPrint test is performed, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is conducted to genomic High Risk patients, and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is conducted to Low Risk patients. Although adjuvant therapy is conducted after the completion of this study, in case there is progressive disease (PD) after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy is conducted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I

1. MammaPrint high risk :

* Neoadjuvant chemotherapy : Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide #4 followed by Docetaxel #4
2. MammaPrint low risk :

* Premenopausal women : Letrozole 2.5mg PO QD + leuprorelin acetate 3.6mg SQ every 4weeks during 16 weeks (if needed, maximum for 24 weeks)
* Postmenopausal women : Letrozole 2.5mg PO QD during 16 weeks (if needed, maximum for 24 weeks)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Leuprorelin acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

In premenopausal women, 3.75mg of leuprorelin acetate is subcutaneously administered once every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. (if needed, maximum for 24 weeks)

Letrozole

Intervention Type DRUG

2.5 mg tablet is orally administered once a day, without regard to meals, for 16 weeks (if needed, maximum for 24 weeks)

MammaPrint

Intervention Type GENETIC

In this study, patients with MammaPrint test is performed, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is conducted to genomic High Risk patients, and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is conducted to Low Risk patients.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Leuprorelin acetate

In premenopausal women, 3.75mg of leuprorelin acetate is subcutaneously administered once every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. (if needed, maximum for 24 weeks)

Intervention Type DRUG

Letrozole

2.5 mg tablet is orally administered once a day, without regard to meals, for 16 weeks (if needed, maximum for 24 weeks)

Intervention Type DRUG

MammaPrint

In this study, patients with MammaPrint test is performed, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is conducted to genomic High Risk patients, and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is conducted to Low Risk patients.

Intervention Type GENETIC

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Leuplin Lenara Bretra

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Histopathologically and immunohistochemically confirmed ER+ and HER2- BC patients
2. Stage I-IIIA BC patients with detectable tumor sizes
3. BC patients for whom BCS is not feasible due to tumor sizes or locations (two surgeons at each institution evaluate the infeasibility of BCS)
4. Patients without distant metastasis which were identified pathologically or radiologically
5. Female patients ≥ 19 years

* Diagnosis of menopause is defined as no menstruation for 1-year or both ovaries removed surgically
6. ECOG 0-2
7. Patients with adequate bone marrow function

* Hemoglobin 10 g/dL, ANC 1,500/mm3, Plt 100,000/mm3
8. Patients with adequate kidney function

* serum Cr ≤ 1.5 mg/dL
9. Patients with adequate liver function

* Bilirubin: ≤ 1.5 times of upper normal limit
* AST/ALT: ≤ 1.5 times of upper normal limit
* Alkaline phosphatase: ≤ 1.5 times of upper normal limit
10. Patients who decided to voluntarily participate in this trial with written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of treatment for ipsilateral BC or breast carcinoma in situ
2. Confirmed distant metastasis of BC
3. History of cancer other than BC
4. Pregnant (positive pregnancy test within a week of enrollment) or breast-feeding patients
5. Uncontrolled severe infection
6. Psychiatric illness or epilepsy
7. Male BC patients
8. Inability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent
9. Mammographic extensive microcalcification
10. Multicentral, Bilateral BC
11. History of chemotherapy or endocrine therapy on contralateral BC for the past 2 years
12. ER-
13. HER2+
14. Undetectable and unmeasurable primary tumor size
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wonshik Han

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wonshik Han

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PLATO study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.