Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluating New Surgical Technique in Management of Female Patients With Operable Multifocal Breast Cancer (NCT NCT03900299)
NCT ID: NCT03900299
Last Updated: 2020-07-29
Results Overview
assessment of the occurrence of local or distant recurrence through: 1. monthly clinical examination of both breast and axillae 2. monthly liver functions tests and complete blood count 3. radiological assessment if clinically indicated
UNKNOWN
NA
114 participants
a median of 30 months post operative
2020-07-29
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by MRM
multifocal breast cancer patients involved in the study will be randomized to be treated either by oncoplastic breast conserving surgery or modified radical mastectomy(MRM)
|
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by OPS
multifocal breast cancer patients involved in the study randomized in the setting of receiving surgical treatment either modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or oncoplastic breast surgery(OPS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
56
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
56
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by MRM
n=56 Participants
multifocal breast cancer patients involved in the study will be randomized to be treated either by oncoplastic breast conserving surgery or modified radical mastectomy(MRM)
|
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by OPS
n=58 Participants
multifocal breast cancer patients involved in the study randomized in the setting of receiving surgical treatment either modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or oncoplastic breast surgery(OPS)
|
Total
n=114 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<40
|
3 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
40-49
|
10 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
50-59
|
14 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
60+
|
29 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
56 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Egypt
|
56 participants
n=56 Participants
|
58 participants
n=58 Participants
|
114 participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
tumor size
T1
|
23 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
tumor size
T2
|
32 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
|
tumor size
T3
|
1 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: a median of 30 months post operativeassessment of the occurrence of local or distant recurrence through: 1. monthly clinical examination of both breast and axillae 2. monthly liver functions tests and complete blood count 3. radiological assessment if clinically indicated
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by MRM
n=56 Participants
multifocal breast cancer patients involved in the study will be randomized to be treated either by oncoplastic breast conserving surgery or modified radical mastectomy(MRM)
|
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by OPS
n=58 Participants
multifocal breast cancer patients involved in the study randomized in the setting of receiving surgical treatment either modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or oncoplastic breast surgery(OPS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Recurrence of the Tumor
Tumor recurrence
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Recurrence of the Tumor
no tumor recurrence
|
54 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: a median of 30 months post operativePopulation: overall number of participants subjected to oncoplastic breast surgery is 58 subdivided to categories according to the oncoplastic technique used, totally 58 patients
assessment of breast cosmesis after oncoplastic surgical intervention.Evaluation is based on 5 criteria, namely: breast symmetry, glandular tissue defects, nipple and areola reconstruction, scar quality and/or retraction, and the resultant breast shape. each criteria will be evaluated either satisfactory or not,satisfactory evaluation will represent 1 point. unsatisfactory will represent 0 point excellent result is equal or more than 4 points good result is equal to 3 points fair result is equal to 2 points bad result is equal to 1 point or less
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by MRM
n=58 Participants
multifocal breast cancer patients involved in the study will be randomized to be treated either by oncoplastic breast conserving surgery or modified radical mastectomy(MRM)
|
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by OPS
multifocal breast cancer patients involved in the study randomized in the setting of receiving surgical treatment either modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or oncoplastic breast surgery(OPS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cosmetic Result
theraputic lateral mammoplasty · excellent cosmetic result
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
theraputic lateral mammoplasty · very good cosmetic result
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
round block · excellent cosmetic result
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
round block · very good cosmetic result
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
parallelogram mastopxy · excellent cosmetic result
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
parallelogram mastopxy · very good cosmetic result
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
V theraputic mammoplasty · excellent cosmetic result
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
V theraputic mammoplasty · very good cosmetic result
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
Latissimus Dorsi flap · excellent cosmetic result
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
Latissimus Dorsi flap · very good cosmetic result
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
J theraputic mammoplasty · excellent cosmetic result
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
J theraputic mammoplasty · very good cosmetic result
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
grisotti flap · excellent cosmetic result
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
grisotti flap · very good cosmetic result
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
reduction therapeutic mammoplasty · excellent cosmetic result
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Cosmetic Result
reduction therapeutic mammoplasty · very good cosmetic result
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by MRM
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by OPS
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by MRM
n=56 participants at risk
multifocal breast cancer patient treated by modified radical mastectomy(MRM) 66 patients
Early complications Haematoma 2 patients out of 56 Seroma 16 patients out of 56 Skin or flap necrosis 5 patients out of 56 Abcess 3 patients out of 56
Late complications Scar fibrosis 2 patients out of 56 keloid 1 patients out of 56
|
Multifocal Breast Cancer Patients Treated Surgically by OPS
n=58 participants at risk
multifocal breast cancer patients treated by oncoplastic breast surgery(OPS) 58 patients
Early complications Haematoma 2 patients out of 58 Seroma 10 patients out of 58 Abcess 4 patients out of 58 Skin or NAC necrosis 2 patients out of 58
Late complications Scar fibrosis 3 patients out of 58 keloid 2 patients out of 58 steatonecrosis 5 patients out of 58
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Haematoma
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
3.4%
2/58 • Number of events 2 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Seroma
|
28.6%
16/56 • Number of events 16 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
17.2%
10/58 • Number of events 10 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
skin necrosis
|
8.9%
5/56 • Number of events 5 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
3.4%
2/58 • Number of events 2 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
abcess
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
6.9%
4/58 • Number of events 5 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Scar fibrosis
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
5.2%
3/58 • Number of events 3 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
keloid
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
3.4%
2/58 • Number of events 2 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
steatonecrosis
|
0.00%
0/56 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
8.6%
5/58 • Number of events 5 • through 24 months post operative
Early complications 1. Haematoma 2. Seroma 3. Abcess 4. Skin or NAC necrosis Late complications 1. Scar fibrosis 2. keloid 3. steatonecrosis
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place