Trial Outcomes & Findings for Post Marketing Study to Evaluate the NIMBUS Device (NCT NCT03898960)
NCT ID: NCT03898960
Last Updated: 2025-04-25
Results Overview
Successful revascularization was defined as achieving an modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater as determined by an Independent Core Laboratory. The expanded treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score was a modified from the mTICI scale. eTICI was a 6-point grading system for determining the response of thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: 0=No reperfusion; 0 percent (%) filling of the downstream territory; 1=Thrombus reduction without any reperfusion of distal arteries; 2a=Reperfusion in less than half (1-49%) of the territory; 2b=2b50 (reperfusion in \[50-66%\] of downstream territory) and 2b67 (reperfusion in (67-89%) of downstream territory); 2c=Reperfusion in \[90-99%\] of downstream territory; 3=Complete and 100% reperfusion.
COMPLETED
54 participants
Day 1
2025-04-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
54
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
Post Marketing Study to Evaluate the NIMBUS Device
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=54 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
71.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.09 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device). Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Successful revascularization was defined as achieving an modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater as determined by an Independent Core Laboratory. The expanded treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score was a modified from the mTICI scale. eTICI was a 6-point grading system for determining the response of thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: 0=No reperfusion; 0 percent (%) filling of the downstream territory; 1=Thrombus reduction without any reperfusion of distal arteries; 2a=Reperfusion in less than half (1-49%) of the territory; 2b=2b50 (reperfusion in \[50-66%\] of downstream territory) and 2b67 (reperfusion in (67-89%) of downstream territory); 2c=Reperfusion in \[90-99%\] of downstream territory; 3=Complete and 100% reperfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=51 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Successful Revascularization With NIMBUS Device
|
68.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 54.1 to 80.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: The mITT analysis set consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device). Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Successful procedural revascularization was defined as achieving an mTICI score of 2b or greater at the end of procedure as determined by an Independent Core Laboratory. The eTICI score was a modified from the mTICI scale. eTICI was a 6-point grading system for determining the response of thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: 0=No reperfusion; 0% filling of the downstream territory; 1=Thrombus reduction without any reperfusion of distal arteries; 2a=Reperfusion in less than half (1-49%) of the territory; 2b=2b50 (reperfusion in \[50-66%\] of downstream territory) and 2b67 (reperfusion in \[67-89%\] of downstream territory); 2c=Reperfusion in \[90-99%\] of downstream territory; 3=Complete and 100% reperfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=53 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Successful Procedural Revascularization
|
79.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 65.9 to 89.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: The mITT analysis set consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device). Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Excellent procedural revascularization was defined as achieving an mTICI score of 2c or greater at the end of procedure as determined by an Independent Core Laboratory. The eTICI score was a modified from the mTICI scale. eTICI was a 6-point grading system for determining the response of thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: 0=No reperfusion; 0% filling of the downstream territory; 1=Thrombus reduction without any reperfusion of distal arteries; 2a=Reperfusion in less than half (1-49%) of the territory; 2b=2b50 (reperfusion in \[50-66%\] of downstream territory) and 2b67 (reperfusion in \[67-89%\] of downstream territory); 2c=Reperfusion in (90-99%) of downstream territory; 3=Complete and 100% reperfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=53 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Excellent Procedural Revascularization
|
37.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.8 to 52.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: The mITT analysis set consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device). Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
First Pass revascularization was defined as achieving an mTICI score of 2b or greater after the first use of NIMBUS device as determined by an Independent Core Laboratory. The eTICI score was a modified from the mTICI scale. eTICI was a 6-point grading system for determining the response of thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: 0=No reperfusion; 0% filling of the downstream territory; 1=Thrombus reduction without any reperfusion of distal arteries; 2a=Reperfusion in less than half (1-49%) of the territory; 2b=2b50 (reperfusion in \[50-66%\] of downstream territory) and 2b67 (reperfusion in \[67-89%\] of downstream territory); 2c=Reperfusion in (90-99%) of downstream territory; 3=Complete and 100% reperfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=51 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With First Pass Revascularization Using NIMBUS Device
|
52.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 38.5 to 67.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: The mITT analysis set consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
Percentage of participants with ENT was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=54 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Embolization to a New Territory (ENT)
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: The mITT analysis set consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
Percentage of participants with sICH according to the HBC was reported. sICH was defined as new intracranial hemorrhage detected by brain imaging associated with any of the item: greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points total National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at the time of diagnosis compared to immediately before worsening; \>=2 point in one NIHSS category. The rationale for this was to capture new hemorrhages that produce new neurological symptoms, making them clearly symptomatic but not causing worsening in the original stroke territory; leading to intubation/hemicraniectomy/external ventricular drain (EVD) placement or other major medical/surgical intervention; absence of alternative explanation for deterioration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=54 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (sICH) According to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC)
|
3.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 12.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 90Population: The mITT analysis set consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
Number of participants with all-cause mortality at 90 days post-procedure on Day 0 was reported. All-cause mortality included all deaths of participants due to any cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=54 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All-Cause Mortality
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 90Population: The mRS analysis set consisted of all mITT participants who met study criteria as MRI criterion: volume of diffusion restriction visually assessed \<=50 milliliter(mL), computed tomography(CT) criterion: ASPECTS 6 to 10 on baseline CT, computed tomography angiography(CTA)-source images or volume of significantly lowered cerebral blood volume(CBV) \<=50 mL; NIHSS \>=8 and less than (\<)30; participants treated within 6 hours of onset of stroke symptoms (start of treatment defined as groin puncture).
Percentage of participants with mRS score of \<=2 was reported. The mRS was a 7-point scale that ranged from 0 to 6 where 0=no symptoms at all; 1=no significant disability despite symptoms; 2=slight disability; 3=moderate disability; 4=moderately severe disability; 5=severe disability; 6=death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=15 Participants
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score of Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2
|
46.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.3 to 73.4
|
Adverse Events
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=54 participants at risk
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Stroke in evolution
|
7.4%
4/54 • Number of events 4 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemorrhagic transformation stroke
|
5.6%
3/54 • Number of events 3 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain oedema
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral hemorrhage
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischemic stroke
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
14.8%
8/54 • Number of events 8 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
3.7%
2/54 • Number of events 2 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteriuria
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis hemophilus
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endocarditis
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant neoplasm progression
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Mechanical Thrombectomy: NIMBUS Device
n=54 participants at risk
Participants with acute ischemic stroke who had post one or two unsuccessful passes of another mechanical thrombectomy therapy and did not achieve modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction (mTICI) 2b or better, were treated with NIMBUS device.
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Stroke in evolution
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemianopia
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Partial seizures
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular access site pseudoaneurysm
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to Day 90
Safety set included all participants who were enrolled into the study, and who had attempted at least one pass with the NIMBUS device (which included deployment and retrieval with the NIMBUS device).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Draft abstracts, manuscripts, and materials for presentation at scientific meetings must be sent to the sponsor at least 60 working days prior to abstract or other relevant submission deadlines. Authorship of publications resulting from this study was based on generally accepted criteria for major medical journals.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER