The Effect of High vs. Low Fluid Volume on Ocular Parameters in Prone Spine Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03890510

Last Updated: 2020-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

97 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-01

Study Completion Date

2020-09-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this trial is to compare the effect of different fluid volume infusion on ocular parameters in patients undergoing spine surgery in prone position.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the prone position, the intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter increase progressively with time as compared with those in the supine position. Excessive fluid infusion may further increase intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is a dynamic index which can effectively assess fluid responsiveness during general anesthesia.Therefore,the investigators have designed a study to compare the effect of different fluid volume infusion guided by low and high PPV indices on intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath of patients undergoing prone spine surgery with general anesthesia. One group of the patients will receive relatively loose fluid infusion (target value of PPV: 6%-9%),while the other group of the patients will receive limited fluid infusion (target value of PPV: 13%-16%).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prone Position Blood Volume Intraocular Pressure

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pulse pressure variation intraocular pressure optic sheath diameter spine surgery prone position

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomly assigned to the limited fluid infusion group and the loose fluid infusion group.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low PPV Group

After anesthesia induction, patients will receive spine surgery under general anesthesia in the prone position. Ringer's lactate solution will be infused at 1ml/(kg·h ) as a basal speed. Ringer's lactate solution at a volume of 250ml will be used as a bolus dose. Repeat bolus doses will be given to maintain PPV at 6\~9% when necessary. Intraoptic pressure and optic sheath diameter will be measured at multiple time points.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ringer's Lactate solution

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients in both groups will receive Ringer's lactate solution continuously during operation with different infusion volume.

Spine surgery under general Anesthesia in the prone position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The surgery, general anesthesia, and the placement of the prone position will be performed according to the standard procedures.

High PPV Group

After anesthesia induction, patients will receive spine surgery under general anesthesia in the prone position. Ringer's lactate solution will be infused at 1ml/(kg·h ) as a basal speed. Ringer's lactate solution at a volume of 250ml will be used as a bolus dose. Repeat bolus doses will be given to maintain PPV at 13\~16% when necessary. Intraoptic pressure and optic sheath diameter will be measured at multiple time points.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ringer's Lactate solution

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients in both groups will receive Ringer's lactate solution continuously during operation with different infusion volume.

Spine surgery under general Anesthesia in the prone position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The surgery, general anesthesia, and the placement of the prone position will be performed according to the standard procedures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ringer's Lactate solution

Patients in both groups will receive Ringer's lactate solution continuously during operation with different infusion volume.

Intervention Type OTHER

Spine surgery under general Anesthesia in the prone position

The surgery, general anesthesia, and the placement of the prone position will be performed according to the standard procedures.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Scheduled for elective spine surgery in prone position under general anesthesia
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
* Have signed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* History of eye disease or eye surgery
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Known Allergy to latex or Ringer's lactate solution
* Hyperlactacidemia,uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, arrhythmia, cardiovascular disease,chronic pulmonary disease, swelling of any body part, abnormal of liver or renal function, anemia, etc.
* Body mass index(BMI)\>30
* Expected operation time \>6 hours
* Estimated Intraoperative hemorrhage \>1000ml
* Taking part in other clinical trials in the last 3 months or at present
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Huashan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Xiao-Yu Yang, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Xiaoyu Yang, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Huashan Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huashan Hospital Fudan University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cheng MA, Todorov A, Tempelhoff R, McHugh T, Crowder CM, Lauryssen C. The effect of prone positioning on intraocular pressure in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1351-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11748391 (View on PubMed)

Uribe AA, Baig MN, Puente EG, Viloria A, Mendel E, Bergese SD. Current intraoperative devices to reduce visual loss after spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Aug;33(2):E14. doi: 10.3171/2009.8.FOCUS09151.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22853832 (View on PubMed)

American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss. Practice advisory for perioperative visual loss associated with spine surgery: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss. Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):274-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c104d. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22227790 (View on PubMed)

Blecha S, Harth M, Schlachetzki F, Zeman F, Blecha C, Flora P, Burger M, Denzinger S, Graf BM, Helbig H, Pawlik MT. Changes in intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in steep 45 degrees Trendelenburg position. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Mar 11;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0333-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28284189 (View on PubMed)

Warner MA. Postoperative visual loss: experts, data, and practice. Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):641-2. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00002. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17006056 (View on PubMed)

Grant GP, Szirth BC, Bennett HL, Huang SS, Thaker RS, Heary RF, Turbin RE. Effects of prone and reverse trendelenburg positioning on ocular parameters. Anesthesiology. 2010 Jan;112(1):57-65. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c294e1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19996956 (View on PubMed)

Lee LA, Roth S, Posner KL, Cheney FW, Caplan RA, Newman NJ, Domino KB. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Postoperative Visual Loss Registry: analysis of 93 spine surgery cases with postoperative visual loss. Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):652-9; quiz 867-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17006060 (View on PubMed)

Lee LA. Perioperative visual loss and anesthetic management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;26(3):375-81. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328360dcd9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23614957 (View on PubMed)

Li A, Swinney C, Veeravagu A, Bhatti I, Ratliff J. Postoperative Visual Loss Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Risk Factors by Diagnosis. World Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;84(6):2010-21. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.030. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26341434 (View on PubMed)

Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Fineberg SJ, Singh R, Singh K. Incidence and risk factors for perioperative visual loss after spinal fusion. Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1866-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.026. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24216394 (View on PubMed)

Roth S. Perioperative visual loss: what do we know, what can we do? Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i31-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep295.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20007988 (View on PubMed)

Farag E, Sessler DI, Kovaci B, Wang L, Mascha EJ, Bell G, Kalfas I, Rockwood E, Kurz A. Effects of crystalloid versus colloid and the alpha-2 agonist brimonidine versus placebo on intraocular pressure during prone spine surgery: a factorial randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2012 Apr;116(4):807-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182475c10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22322966 (View on PubMed)

Yang XY, Wei MM, Tan H, Wang HL, Luo MQ, Xu M, Wang YW. The effect of restrictive vs. liberal fluid protocols on ocular parameters in patients undergoing prone spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Jun 12;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00310-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37308905 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FOCUS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id