Effects of Topical Lidocaine During Urodynamic Testing In Women
NCT ID: NCT03881293
Last Updated: 2019-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-12-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study included 110 adult women. The purpose was:
1. Determine whether the use of topical lidocaine during urodynamic testing decreases patient discomfort during the procedure.
2. Evaluate whether the use of topical lidocaine affects the urodynamic results.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lidocaine for Pain After Urodynamic Testing
NCT03390790
Effect of Urethral Analgesia on Voiding
NCT02823431
Cervical Lidocaine for Intrauterine Device Insertion Pain
NCT01411995
Double Blinded Randomized Trial Between Lidocaine And Plain Gel For Urethral Straight Catheterization And The Q-Tip Test
NCT00883103
Reducing Urethral Pain During Urodynamic Test - Comparison Between Lidocaine Gel and Paraffin Oil
NCT01837628
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis / aims of study
1. Determine whether the use of topical lidocaine during urodynamic testing decreases patient discomfort during the procedure.
2. Evaluate whether the use of topical lidocaine affects the urodynamic results.
Study design, materials and methods The hospital IRB approved the study. Women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) scheduled for a urodynamic study (UDS) were eligible to participate. Women presenting with predominant overactive bladder symptoms were excluded. Participants were randomized on the day of the procedure using Random Allocation Software Version 1.0. All were blinded to the study arms until completion of final data analysis. Participant randomization assignment was known only to an independent research nurse and the dispensing pharmacist. The study consisted of transurethral administration of 5 ml lidocaine 2% gel or surgilube gel, in the study and control arms, respectively, 10 minutes before catheter insertion. Prior to testing, a 24 hour bladder diary and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory - Short Form 20 were completed. During the UDS participants were asked for sensory information including desire to void and maximal cystometric capacity (MCC). Urethral pressure profiles were obtained at an infused volume of 200 ml. Provocative measures were performed to assess SUI. Using a Likert scale, pain was assessed prior to and after catheter insertion, after performing the urethral pressure profile, and at the completion of the study. The primary outcome; pain after urethral pressure profile (UPP), was compared between the two groups. Comparisons of the bladder diary and UDS results were made between study and control arms individually and in-between groups.
Statistical methods The effect of lidocaine on patient pain as reported during multiple time-points during the UDS was evaluated using repeated measures analysis via mixed effects regression with a random patient-specific intercept. This approach allows the evaluation of the overall pain experience, as well as baseline-adjusted comparison at individual time-points. Comparisons were done using t-tests for continuous variables, Chi-squared test for categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), and a z-test. The CCC provides a generalization of Pearson's correlation coefficient that measures how well the data align with the diagonal representing equal values for the two measurements (as opposed to any straight line). Agreement is stronger than correlation. Specifically, the agreement between mean void volume and volume at strong desire, as well as between maximum void volume and volume at MCC were computed separately for each study group. The CCC values were compared between the study groups using a z-test. Power calculations determined a total sample size of 110 participants was needed to detect significant differences between the groups with at least 94% statistical power.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo Lubricant Gel
5 ml water-soluble gel instilled transurethrally ten minutes prior to catheter insertion
water soluble lubricant
Transurethral instillation of 5 ml water soluble lubricant
Lidocaine 2% Gel
5 ml lidocaine 2% gel instilled transurethrally ten minutes prior to catheter insertion
lidocaine 2% gel
Transurethral instillation of 5 ml lidocaine 2% gel
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lidocaine 2% gel
Transurethral instillation of 5 ml lidocaine 2% gel
water soluble lubricant
Transurethral instillation of 5 ml water soluble lubricant
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Community dwelling elderly patients who were able to provide their own history and were able to sign for themselves
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
WomenConnected
UNKNOWN
Kristine Zinkgraf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kristine Zinkgraf
Advanced Practice Nurse
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katherine Stevenson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ProHealth Care
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB#12-09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.