Implementation of Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders.
NCT ID: NCT03869177
Last Updated: 2023-01-04
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
460 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2019-03-21
Study Completion Date
2022-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will develop and evaluate a complex intervention to implement guidelines on family involvement for patients with psychotic disorders (F20-29 in International Classification of Diseases ICD-10) in community mental health centres, by using a cluster randomised design. Fifteen Norwegian outpatient units participate in the study, and each of them constitutes a single cluster, except for two collaborating clinics who are considered one cluster.
Of the fourteen clusters, half will receive implementation support and training immediately, whereas the other half will receive it one and a half year later. The study will assess both service level outcomes, by measuring fidelity scores, and selected outcomes for patients and relatives, by collecting questionnaires and data from central health registers and patient records. In addition, qualitative interviews will be performed with patients, relatives and health care personnel. The study will also include a cost-effectiveness analysis and a political economy analysis.
Of the fourteen clusters, half will receive implementation support and training immediately, whereas the other half will receive it one and a half year later. The study will assess both service level outcomes, by measuring fidelity scores, and selected outcomes for patients and relatives, by collecting questionnaires and data from central health registers and patient records. In addition, qualitative interviews will be performed with patients, relatives and health care personnel. The study will also include a cost-effectiveness analysis and a political economy analysis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Implementation of National Guidelines for Treatment of Psychoses
NCT03271242
Psychotic Disorders
COMPLETED
Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Psychosis
NCT04051775
Psychosis; Schizophrenia-Like
UNKNOWN
Implementation of a Tool for Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Severe Mental Disorders ( HEALTHYHEART )
NCT06807242
Schizophrenic Psychoses
Schizophrenia
Severe Mental Disorder
COMPLETED
Prevention Trial of Family Focused Treatment in Youth at Risk for Psychosis
NCT01907282
Psychosis
COMPLETED
NA
Extreme Challenges - Psychopathology & Treatment Experiences Among Severly Selfharming Inpatients in Norway
NCT03768674
Self Harm
Personality Disorders
Psychosis
+3 more
COMPLETED
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background:
Family involvement during severe mental illness, such as psychotic disorders, is both important and challenging. Evidence suggest that family interventions for persons with psychotic disorders are associated with positive outcomes for both relatives and patients, and economic analyses of such interventions consistently report net saving. There are also important moral imperatives to involve those providing unpaid and informal care. Yet research has shown that relatives of patients with severe mental illness experience little involvement, and that the implementation of family interventions is patchy. The Norwegian national guidelines on family involvement in the public health- and care services and the national guidelines on psychotic disorders, both give recommendations on family involvement. However, there is little knowledge about how to achieve their implementation, and whether a high degree of implementation will be associated with improvements in selected outcomes for patients and relatives.
Setting:
Fifteen outpatient units from community mental health centres in the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.
Research questions:
1. What is the current level of implementation of the selected recommendations in the national guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in participating clinical units?
2. What are important barriers to and facilitators for implementing the national guidelines among the stakeholders at the clinical, organisational, and policy level?
3. What are important moral dilemmas and conflicting interests related to family involvement, and how can these be resolved?
4. Is implementation of the selected recommendations increased by a comprehensive implementation support program, compared with no such support?
5. Is a higher level of implementation of the selected recommendations associated with improvements in selected outcomes for patients and relatives?
6. Is implementation of family involvement during primary psychotic disorders a cost-effective intervention?
Hypotheses:
1. The current implementation of the selected recommendations in the national guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders is low.
2. There are important barriers to and facilitators for implementing the national guidelines among the stakeholders, at the clinical, organisational and policy level.
3. There are important moral dilemmas and conflicting interests, and these can be dealt with through systematic triadic approaches and ethics reflection.
4. A comprehensive implementation program for the selected recommendations is associated with a significantly higher implementation of family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders, compared to no such specific program.
5. Higher implementation of the selected recommendations is associated with improved outcomes for patients and relatives.
6. Outcomes for relatives, patients and the public health- and welfare services justify the costs of implementing family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders.
Family involvement during severe mental illness, such as psychotic disorders, is both important and challenging. Evidence suggest that family interventions for persons with psychotic disorders are associated with positive outcomes for both relatives and patients, and economic analyses of such interventions consistently report net saving. There are also important moral imperatives to involve those providing unpaid and informal care. Yet research has shown that relatives of patients with severe mental illness experience little involvement, and that the implementation of family interventions is patchy. The Norwegian national guidelines on family involvement in the public health- and care services and the national guidelines on psychotic disorders, both give recommendations on family involvement. However, there is little knowledge about how to achieve their implementation, and whether a high degree of implementation will be associated with improvements in selected outcomes for patients and relatives.
Setting:
Fifteen outpatient units from community mental health centres in the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.
Research questions:
1. What is the current level of implementation of the selected recommendations in the national guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in participating clinical units?
2. What are important barriers to and facilitators for implementing the national guidelines among the stakeholders at the clinical, organisational, and policy level?
3. What are important moral dilemmas and conflicting interests related to family involvement, and how can these be resolved?
4. Is implementation of the selected recommendations increased by a comprehensive implementation support program, compared with no such support?
5. Is a higher level of implementation of the selected recommendations associated with improvements in selected outcomes for patients and relatives?
6. Is implementation of family involvement during primary psychotic disorders a cost-effective intervention?
Hypotheses:
1. The current implementation of the selected recommendations in the national guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders is low.
2. There are important barriers to and facilitators for implementing the national guidelines among the stakeholders, at the clinical, organisational and policy level.
3. There are important moral dilemmas and conflicting interests, and these can be dealt with through systematic triadic approaches and ethics reflection.
4. A comprehensive implementation program for the selected recommendations is associated with a significantly higher implementation of family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders, compared to no such specific program.
5. Higher implementation of the selected recommendations is associated with improved outcomes for patients and relatives.
6. Outcomes for relatives, patients and the public health- and welfare services justify the costs of implementing family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Psychotic Disorders
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
The study is a cluster randomised controlled trial. Fourteen clusters will be stratified into three strata according to their estimated number of patients with psychotic disorders currently in treatment. The clusters within each stratum will then be randomised to either intervention or control arms with an allocation ratio of 1:1.The seven outpatient units in the intervention arm receives a comprehensive implementation support program, whereas the outpatient clinics in the control arm receives no implementation support.
A similar number of patients and relatives will be recruited from both arms, preferably in dyadic pairs, for the quantitative patient- and relative sub study. Employees from the clusters in the intervention arm will be recruited to answer a questionnaire, as part of the implementation study. Patients, relatives and employees will be recruited from the clusters in the intervention arm to take part in qualitative interviews.
A similar number of patients and relatives will be recruited from both arms, preferably in dyadic pairs, for the quantitative patient- and relative sub study. Employees from the clusters in the intervention arm will be recruited to answer a questionnaire, as part of the implementation study. Patients, relatives and employees will be recruited from the clusters in the intervention arm to take part in qualitative interviews.
Primary Study Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Patients and relatives will not be informed about their outpatient clinic's allocation status. However, they may deduce this from the kind of treatment they receive. It's impossible to blind the care providers and for practical reasons we won't be able to blind the investigators or the outcomes assessors.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention arm
Clusters (psychiatric outpatient clinics) in the intervention arm receives a comprehensive implementation support program during the trial period.
Group Type
OTHER
Implementation support program
Intervention Type
OTHER
The IFIP intervention consists of the following elements:
I. Clinical interventions 1.1 A basic level of family involvement and support 1.2 Family psychoeducation in single-family groups
II. Implementation interventions 2.1 Training and guidance of health care personnel 2.2 A family coordinator 2.3 Other implementation measures
Control arm
Clusters (psychiatric outpatient clinics) in the control arm receives no implementation support during the trial period.
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implementation support program
The IFIP intervention consists of the following elements:
I. Clinical interventions 1.1 A basic level of family involvement and support 1.2 Family psychoeducation in single-family groups
II. Implementation interventions 2.1 Training and guidance of health care personnel 2.2 A family coordinator 2.3 Other implementation measures
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To have an established psychotic disorder (F20-29 in ICD-10) or a tentative diagnosis of psychotic disorder, certain enough to begin treatment. This need not be the patient's primary diagnosis.
* To be 18 years or older at the time of inclusion.
* Being a relative of a patient with a diagnosis as described above.
* To be 18 years or older at the time of inclusion.
* To be 18 years or older at the time of inclusion.
* Being a relative of a patient with a diagnosis as described above.
* To be 18 years or older at the time of inclusion.
Exclusion Criteria
* To be sentenced to psychiatric treatment.
* Not being competent to consent to participation in research.
* Having completed more than five joint sessions of family psychoeducation in single-family groups (patient and relative together) or more than ten joint sessions (multiple families together) in multiple-family groups, or a similarly structured family intervention.
* Not having any relatives or next of kin.
• Having completed more than five joint sessions (patient and relative together) of family psychoeducation in single-family groups or more than ten joint sessions (multiple families together) in multiple-family groups, or a similarly structured family intervention.
* Not being competent to consent to participation in research.
* Having completed more than five joint sessions of family psychoeducation in single-family groups (patient and relative together) or more than ten joint sessions (multiple families together) in multiple-family groups, or a similarly structured family intervention.
* Not having any relatives or next of kin.
• Having completed more than five joint sessions (patient and relative together) of family psychoeducation in single-family groups or more than ten joint sessions (multiple families together) in multiple-family groups, or a similarly structured family intervention.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oslo Metropolitan University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University Hospital, Akershus
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Helse Fonna
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Sykehuset Telemark
OTHER_GOV
Sponsor Role
collaborator
The Research Council of Norway
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Helse Sor-Ost
OTHER_GOV
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Oslo
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Reidar Pedersen
Professor
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Reidar Pedersen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Professor and head of department, Centre for medical ethics,University of Oslo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Asker DPS - Vestre Viken HF
Asker, , Norway
Site Status
Drammen DPS - Vestre Viken HF
Drammen, , Norway
Site Status
Ringerike DPS - Vestre Viken HF
Hønefoss, , Norway
Site Status
Kongsberg DPS - Vestre Viken HF
Kongsberg, , Norway
Site Status
DPS poliklinikk Vestmar/stathelle - Sykehuset Telemark
Kragerø, , Norway
Site Status
Vestfold DPS - Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
Larvik, , Norway
Site Status
Nedre Romerike DPS - Akershus Universitetssykehus HF
Lillestrøm, , Norway
Site Status
Groruddalen DPS - Akershus Universitetssykehus HF
Oslo, , Norway
Site Status
Søndre Oslo DPS - Oslo Universitetssykehus HF
Oslo, , Norway
Site Status
Voksenpsykiatrisk avdeling Vinderen - Diakonhjemmet Sykehus
Oslo, , Norway
Site Status
DPS poliklinikk Porsgrunn - Sykehuset Telemark
Porsgrunn, , Norway
Site Status
Bærum DPS -Vestre Viken HF
Sandvika, , Norway
Site Status
DPS poliklinikk Seljord - Sykehuset Telemark
Seljord, , Norway
Site Status
DPS poliklinikk Skien - Sykehuset Telemark
Skien, , Norway
Site Status
Vestfold DPS - Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
Tønsberg, , Norway
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Norway
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Eisen SV, Normand SL, Belanger AJ, Spiro A 3rd, Esch D. The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R): reliability and validity. Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1230-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00010.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Keetharuth AD, Brazier J, Connell J, Bjorner JB, Carlton J, Taylor Buck E, Ricketts T, McKendrick K, Browne J, Croudace T, Barkham M. Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;212(1):42-49. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999 Spring;45(1):7-12. doi: 10.1177/002076409904500102.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Szmukler GI, Burgess P, Herrman H, Benson A, Colusa S, Bloch S. Caring for relatives with serious mental illness: the development of the Experience of Caregiving Inventory. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;31(3-4):137-48. doi: 10.1007/BF00785760.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Brouwer WB, van Exel NJ, van Gorp B, Redekop WK. The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res. 2006 Aug;15(6):1005-21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-5994-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wiedemann G, Rayki O, Feinstein E, Hahlweg K. The Family Questionnaire: development and validation of a new self-report scale for assessing expressed emotion. Psychiatry Res. 2002 Apr 15;109(3):265-79. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00023-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Quirk, A., Smith, S., Hamilton, S., Lamping, D., Lelliot, P., Stahl, D., Pinfold, V & Andiappan, M. (2012). Development of the carer well-being and support (CWS) questionnaire. Mental Health Review Journal 17:128-38.doi:10.1108/13619321211287184
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SB, Hadden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;172:11-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.1.11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Berman AH, Bergman H, Palmstierna T, Schlyter F. Evaluation of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in criminal justice and detoxification settings and in a Swedish population sample. Eur Addict Res. 2005;11(1):22-31. doi: 10.1159/000081413.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Karterud S, Pedersen G, Løvdal H, Friis S. S-GAF: Global Funsjonsskåring - Splittet Versjon [Global Assessment of Functioning - Split version]. Bakgrunn og skåringsveiledning. Klinikk for psykiatri, Ullevål sykehus, Oslo, 1998.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hooley JM, Teasdale JD. Predictors of relapse in unipolar depressives: expressed emotion, marital distress, and perceived criticism. J Abnorm Psychol. 1989 Aug;98(3):229-35. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.98.3.229.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pharoah F, Mari J, Rathbone J, Wong W. Family intervention for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;(12):CD000088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000088.pub2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Yesufu-Udechuku A, Harrison B, Mayo-Wilson E, Young N, Woodhams P, Shiers D, Kuipers E, Kendall T. Interventions to improve the experience of caring for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):268-74. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147561.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Helsedirektoratet. (2013). Utredning, behandling og oppfølging av personer med psykoselidelser. Retrieved March 22, 2018, from https://helsedirektoratet.no/Lists/Publikasjoner/Attachments/326/Nasjonal-faglig-retningslinje-for-utredning-behandling-og-oppfolging-av-personer-med-psykoselidelser-IS-1957.pdf.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Helsedirektoratet. (2017). Veileder om pårørende i helse- og omsorgstjenesten. Retrieved March 22, 2018, from https://helsedirektoratet.no/Retningslinjer/Pårørendeveileder.pdf
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
McHugo GJ, Drake RE, Whitley R, Bond GR, Campbell K, Rapp CA, Goldman HH, Lutz WJ, Finnerty MT. Fidelity outcomes in the National Implementing Evidence-Based Practices Project. Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Oct;58(10):1279-84. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.10.1279.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vermeulen, B., Lauwers, H., Spruytte, N., Van Audenhove, C., Magro, C., Saunders, J. & Jones, K. (2015). Experiences of family caregivers for persons with severe mental illness: an international exploration. Leuven: LUCAS KU Leuven/EUFAMI.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Torrey WC, Drake RE, Dixon L, Burns BJ, Flynn L, Rush AJ, Clark RE, Klatzker D. Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jan;52(1):45-50. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.1.45.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Norheim I, Pedersen R, Selle ML, Rossberg JI, Hestmark L, Heiervang KS, Ruud T, Asholt VM, Hansson KM, Moller P, Fosse R, Romoren M. Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Effect on relatives' outcomes and family interventions received. Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 24;15:1381007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1381007. eCollection 2024.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Hestmark L, Romoren M, Heiervang KS, Hansson KM, Ruud T, Saltyte Benth J, Norheim I, Weimand B, Pedersen R. Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons with Psychotic Disorders (IFIP): A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 May;50(3):520-533. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01255-0. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Hansson KM, Romoren M, Weimand B, Heiervang KS, Hestmark L, Landeweer EGM, Pedersen R. The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04461-6.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Hansson KM, Romoren M, Pedersen R, Weimand B, Hestmark L, Norheim I, Ruud T, Hymer IS, Heiervang KS. Barriers and facilitators when implementing family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a nested qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 12;22(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08489-y.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Hestmark L, Heiervang KS, Pedersen R, Hansson KM, Ruud T, Romoren M. Family involvement practices for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a cross-sectional fidelity-based study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03300-4.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Hestmark L, Romoren M, Heiervang KS, Weimand B, Ruud T, Norvoll R, Hansson KM, Norheim I, Aas E, Landeweer EGM, Pedersen R. Implementation of guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres (IFIP): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 9;20(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05792-4.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NFR 262863
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Honest Open Proud for Psychotic and Bipolar Disorder in Norway
NCT06384755
RECRUITING
NA
Acute, Affective, Organic Disorders.
NCT00201474
COMPLETED
Seven-step Phenomenological Psychotherapy for Self-disorder - a Pilot Study
NCT06597864
RECRUITING
NA
First Episode Psychosis and Pathway to Care in Nordland
NCT01753284
COMPLETED
Anomalous Self-Experience in First Episode Psychosis - A Six-Year Follow-Up Study
NCT02321943
COMPLETED
Service User and Staff Views on Digital Remote Monitoring for Psychosis
NCT05670197
COMPLETED
Use, Effects and Side-effects of Second-generation Antipsychotics in a Naturalistic Setting
NCT00932529
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Psychosis: Early Detection, Intervention and Prevention
NCT01597141
COMPLETED
NA
Impact of Burden in Caregivers of Patients Hospitalized for a Psychotic Episode: a Multicenter Study
NCT04423809
COMPLETED
Clinical Trial of Integrated Treatment Versus Standard Treatment in First Episode Psychosis
NCT00157313
UNKNOWN
NA
Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) and Pathways to Care in Nordland
NCT01196858
COMPLETED
Acute Psychological Effects of High Intensity Exercise With Schizophrenia
NCT01310998
COMPLETED
NA
Exercise Therapy in Mental Disorders-study
NCT06313918
RECRUITING
NA
Tracking Service Use and Outcomes II:First Episode Psychosis and Psychotic Disorders Clinic
NCT00248027
TERMINATED
RCT Examining the Effectiveness of Digital Picture Frame Use in Inpatient Setting
NCT02950571
COMPLETED
NA
Improving Family Engagement in Coordinated Specialty Care for First Episode Psychosis
NCT04188366
COMPLETED
NA
Group Training for Social Skills in Psychosis
NCT02181777
COMPLETED
NA
Dimensional and Developmental Profiles of Psychosis in Children and Adolescents
NCT04370730
RECRUITING
NA
Rehabilitation and Quality of Life in Residential Units for People With Longer Term Mental Health Problems
NCT02366117
UNKNOWN
NA
Evaluation of Step-Based Care for Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis
NCT03970005
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Goal Management Training for Patients With Schizophrenia or High Risk for Schizophrenia
NCT03048695
COMPLETED
NA
Relapse Prevention in First Episode Schizophrenia: a 5 Year Trial
NCT01936220
UNKNOWN
NA
Effectiveness of Motivation Skills Training (MST)
NCT05805397
RECRUITING
NA
Psychological Intervention for Relapse Prevention in First Episode Schizophrenia
NCT00161408
UNKNOWN
NA
Goals in Focus: CBT for Motivational Negative Symptoms of Psychosis
NCT05252039
RECRUITING
NA