Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant (NCT NCT03868124)
NCT ID: NCT03868124
Last Updated: 2024-11-29
Results Overview
Change from time-matched baseline in IOP at 8AM and 10AM at Day 10, Week 6 and Month 3. Day 10 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Day 10 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Week 6 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Week 6 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Month 3 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Month 3 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
560 participants
3 Months
2024-11-29
Participant Flow
subjects required to undergo washout of prior IOP-lowering medication(s) if applicable and to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Implant Group 1
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with high elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Implant Group 2
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with low elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Control Group
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops: Sham surgery plus postoperative active-comparator eye drops (Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution, 0.5%)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
185
|
183
|
192
|
|
Overall Study
Month 3
|
182
|
182
|
190
|
|
Overall Study
Month 12
|
176
|
180
|
183
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
185
|
183
|
192
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Implant Group 1
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with high elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Implant Group 2
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with low elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Control Group
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops: Sham surgery plus postoperative active-comparator eye drops (Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution, 0.5%)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Explanted
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Ongoing in study
|
176
|
180
|
183
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Implant Group 1
n=185 Participants
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with high elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Implant Group 2
n=183 Participants
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with low elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Control Group
n=192 Participants
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops: Sham surgery plus postoperative active-comparator eye drops (Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution, 0.5%)
|
Total
n=560 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
285 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
275 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=5 Participants
|
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=7 Participants
|
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=5 Participants
|
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
281 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
279 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
150 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
155 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
162 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
467 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
168 participants
n=5 Participants
|
167 participants
n=7 Participants
|
175 participants
n=5 Participants
|
510 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Armenia
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP
|
24.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.21 • n=5 Participants
|
24.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81 • n=7 Participants
|
24.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99 • n=5 Participants
|
24.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.00 • n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 MonthsPopulation: intent to treatment analysis set which includes all randomized subjects with analyses performed according to original treatment assignment, regardless of actual treatment received
Change from time-matched baseline in IOP at 8AM and 10AM at Day 10, Week 6 and Month 3. Day 10 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Day 10 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Week 6 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Week 6 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Month 3 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Month 3 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implant Group 1
n=185 study eyes
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with high elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Implant Group 2
n=183 study eyes
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with low elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Control Group
n=192 study eyes
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops: Sham surgery plus postoperative active-comparator eye drops (Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution, 0.5%)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative
Day 10, 8AM
|
-8.26 mmHg
Standard Error 0.27
|
-8.40 mmHg
Standard Error 0.27
|
-7.16 mmHg
Standard Error 0.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative
Day 10, 10AM
|
-8.20 mmHg
Standard Error 0.25
|
-8.28 mmHg
Standard Error 0.25
|
-7.08 mmHg
Standard Error 0.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative
Week 6, 8AM
|
-6.83 mmHg
Standard Error 0.26
|
-7.20 mmHg
Standard Error 0.26
|
-7.17 mmHg
Standard Error 0.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative
Week 6, 10AM
|
-6.92 mmHg
Standard Error 0.25
|
-6.83 mmHg
Standard Error 0.25
|
-7.15 mmHg
Standard Error 0.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative
Month 3, 8AM
|
-6.29 mmHg
Standard Error 0.28
|
-6.66 mmHg
Standard Error 0.27
|
-6.82 mmHg
Standard Error 0.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative
Month 3, 10AM
|
-6.21 mmHg
Standard Error 0.27
|
-6.79 mmHg
Standard Error 0.27
|
-6.76 mmHg
Standard Error 0.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsDifference in mean IOP, between each test group and the control group, for IOP measurements through the Month 12 follow-up visit
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Implant Group 1
Implant Group 2
Control Group
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Implant Group 1
n=185 participants at risk
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with high elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Implant Group 2
n=183 participants at risk
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with low elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Control Group
n=192 participants at risk
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops: Sham surgery plus postoperative active-comparator eye drops (Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution, 0.5%)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Combined adverse events in Cardiac Disorders SOC
|
2.7%
5/185 • Number of events 5 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.55%
1/183 • Number of events 1 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.52%
1/192 • Number of events 1 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Combined adverse events in Neoplasms SOC
|
0.54%
1/185 • Number of events 1 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.6%
3/183 • Number of events 3 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.52%
1/192 • Number of events 1 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Implant Group 1
n=185 participants at risk
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with high elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Implant Group 2
n=183 participants at risk
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with low elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops.
G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
|
Control Group
n=192 participants at risk
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops: Sham surgery plus postoperative active-comparator eye drops (Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution, 0.5%)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Iritis
|
4.3%
8/185 • Number of events 8 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
5.5%
10/183 • Number of events 10 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.52%
1/192 • Number of events 1 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
intraocular pressure increased
|
6.5%
12/185 • Number of events 12 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.1%
13/183 • Number of events 13 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
3.1%
6/192 • Number of events 6 • 12 months post-operative
The safety analysis set includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Subjects were grouped according to their actual treatment received, not according to their randomization assignment (as randomized). If subjects were mis-randomized or received incorrect study treatment, they were grouped according to the actual treatment they received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor reserves the right of prior review of any publication or presentation of data from this study.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER