Influence of Dopaminergic Blockade on Stress Responses, Motivation and Emotional Reactivity in Humans.
NCT ID: NCT03863691
Last Updated: 2020-09-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
85 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-15
2020-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore three experiments are planned:
Experiment 1: Influence of amisulpride on human stress responses. Experiment 2: Influence of amisulpride on motivated effort. Experiment 3: Influence of amisulpride on emotion.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Examining the Effects of Antipsychotic Medications on Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00895921
Molecular Mechanisms of Antipsychotic-induced Insulin Resistance
NCT02708394
Effect of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs Olanzapine and Amisulpride on Glucose Metabolism
NCT01160991
Effects of Intranasal Insulin on Neuroimaging Markers and Cognition in Patients With Psychotic Disorders
NCT03943537
One-Year Trial Of Oral Ziprasidone In Patients With Metabolic Syndrome
NCT00748566
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In experiment 1 we want to test whether a medium single dosage of amisulpride (VG) changes human stress responses compared to the PG. Therefore test subjects take the medication / placebo and wait for peak plasma levels. Afterwards they undergo a standardized stress test (MAST procedure,e.g. Shilton et al., 2017) where they submerge their non-dominant hand in cold water and have to do mental arithmetic tasks. We collect ECG, cortisol and skin conductance data as well as subjective measures of the stress response.
In experiment 2 that is done after completion of experiment 1 the aim is testing whether the VG compared to the PG has an altered motivated effort. Therefore so called effort based paradigms (Reddy et al., 2015) are used. In these paradigms participants are given the option between an easy and effortless way of solving a trial that is reinforced with a small monetary reward or a harder and effortful way of trial solving that is rewarded higher. We measure how often the VG versus the PG will take the easy, low reward option over the hard, high reward option.
In experiment 3 and after the completion of experiment to the aim is it to test whether the mean intensity of visually evoked emotions in the VG is changed compared to the PG. Therefore we use a stimulus set (15 positive images, 15 negative images, 15 neutral images) out of the International Affective Picture System images to evoke emotions and plan to analyze data like in positivity offset research (detailed description in: Strauss et al, 2017).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
amisulpride group
300 mg of the atypical antipsychotic drug amisulpride
Amisulpride 300 MG
A single dose of 300 mg amisulpride that looks identical to placebo control capsules.
placebo group
Similar looking capsules for placebo control
Placebo oral capsule
A placebo capsule with no inert pharmacological effect. Looks identical to the amisulpride capsules.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Amisulpride 300 MG
A single dose of 300 mg amisulpride that looks identical to placebo control capsules.
Placebo oral capsule
A placebo capsule with no inert pharmacological effect. Looks identical to the amisulpride capsules.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consent ability for all relevant aspects of the experiment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy to other components of amisulpride / placebo capsules like lactose.
* Daily intake of other medication including contraceptives.
* Tendency to seizures.
* Diagnosis of cancer especially pheochromocytoma, prolactinoma, or breast cancer.
* Kidney dysfunction: creatinine clearance below 10 ml per minute.
* High risk for stroke or thrombosis.
* Known prolongation of the QT interval,
* Any substantial medical condition that is capable of reducing the volunteers ability to participate at the study.
* Suicidal thoughts or suicide attempts in the past or at present.
* Substantial mental disorders especially schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, drug abuse, or personality disorders.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Hamburg-Eppendorf
OTHER
Philipps University Marburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Winfried Rief, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Philipps-Univeristy of Marburg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Gutenbergstr. 18
Marburg, Hesse, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Billman GE, Huikuri HV, Sacha J, Trimmel K. An introduction to heart rate variability: methodological considerations and clinical applications. Front Physiol. 2015 Feb 25;6:55. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00055. eCollection 2015. No abstract available.
Horan WP, Reddy LF, Barch DM, Buchanan RW, Dunayevich E, Gold JM, Marder SR, Wynn JK, Young JW, Green MF. Effort-Based Decision-Making Paradigms for Clinical Trials in Schizophrenia: Part 2-External Validity and Correlates. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1055-65. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv090. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
Reddy LF, Horan WP, Barch DM, Buchanan RW, Dunayevich E, Gold JM, Lyons N, Marder SR, Treadway MT, Wynn JK, Young JW, Green MF. Effort-Based Decision-Making Paradigms for Clinical Trials in Schizophrenia: Part 1-Psychometric Characteristics of 5 Paradigms. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1045-54. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv089. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
Shilton AL, Laycock R, Crewther SG. The Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST): Physiological and Subjective Responses in Anticipation, and Post-stress. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 19;8:567. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00567. eCollection 2017.
Strauss GP, Frost KH, Lee BG, Gold JM. THE POSITIVITY OFFSET THEORY OF ANHEDONIA IN SCHIZOPHRENIA. Clin Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;5(2):226-238. doi: 10.1177/2167702616674989. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
III/sja/kno FF96/2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.