Short Interventions to Prevent Trapezius Muscle Fatigue in Computer Work

NCT ID: NCT03863340

Last Updated: 2019-03-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-14

Study Completion Date

2016-09-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is expected to demonstrate that during experimental days of seated computer work sustained and focalized low-level muscle activity contributes to the development of long-lasting fatigue effects (and thus possible disorder). On days with and without frequent interruptions, signs of fatigue and the activity pattern of the trapeze muscle are registered and compared using electromyographic registrations of the trapezius muscle.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

30 healthy adults without chronic neck pain participated in a laboratory study designed to simulate two full workdays of computer work. Within each session, participants performed five 50-min working activities separated by 10-min breaks: i) Use a computer keyboard to type a text presented on the left side of the screen; ii) do the typing task with the desk height set10 cm above elbow height; iii) play the computer game Spider Solitaire implemented in Windows 10; iv) Stroop test (This test consists of reading the name of a color whose text is in a color different from the name. The color name was then selected from a multiple-choice panel displaying color names; v) the same online puzzle game was presented to all participants. Assembling the puzzle was performed by drag and drop actions. The work periods were not disrupted (on the "control day") whereas two short interruptions of 5-min were introduced at 1/3 and 2/3 of each working period on the "intervention day". During these interruptions, participants were asked to perform "muscle disrupting/relaxing" activities. For each experimental session a 30-min lunch break took place between the third and the fourth work periods. The specific sequence of work activity type and disrupting/relaxing activities was randomized across participants; however, for each participant the order of work activities remained the same for the two experimental sessions (control and intervention days). The order of control and intervention days was also randomized between participants.

A set of six measures were performed at specific time intervals during each experiment: before the first work activity, before and after lunch, immediately and 1 hour after the fifth (last) work activity: i) upper trapezius activation, assessed through the temporal EMG profile recorded by a single bipolar signal; and ii) through the spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity detected by a 2D array of electrodes (64 channels); iii) muscle fatigue, quantified by changes in electrically induced muscle twitch force signals, iv) isometric performance, v) dynamic performance; iii) cognitive and physical load and stress level. In addition, personality traits (anxiety level), perceived workload and musculoskeletal symptoms were evaluated as covariates.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Fatigue Trapezius Muscle Strain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Randomized controlled laboratory experiment. 30 subjects are randomly assigned to two full day experiments either starting with the conditions including additional short interventions or without them.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Participants were informed that the study investigates neuro-motor mechanisms but not about the more specific research questions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

short interruptions of work tasks

randomly start with or without short interruptions on the first experimental day and without or with them on the second experimental day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

interruptions of work tasks

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

During each activity two interruptions/breaks were selected randomly from a set of ten predetermined actions:

Active break types:

* Move shoulder and upper back
* Swing arms near the body
* Three slow but forceful elevations of the shoulders, a relaxation exercise based on the principles developed by Jacobson
* Stand up and stretch
* Slowly turn head in all possible directions.

Passive break types:

* Tell a couple of jokes
* Stand up and have a drink
* Relaxing the trapezius
* Questions on actual posture and feelings of comfort / discomfort.
* A short rest on the couch

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

interruptions of work tasks

During each activity two interruptions/breaks were selected randomly from a set of ten predetermined actions:

Active break types:

* Move shoulder and upper back
* Swing arms near the body
* Three slow but forceful elevations of the shoulders, a relaxation exercise based on the principles developed by Jacobson
* Stand up and stretch
* Slowly turn head in all possible directions.

Passive break types:

* Tell a couple of jokes
* Stand up and have a drink
* Relaxing the trapezius
* Questions on actual posture and feelings of comfort / discomfort.
* A short rest on the couch

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy experienced computer workers

Exclusion Criteria

* chronic pain (more than 30 days within the last 12 months according to the Nordic Questionnaire (Kuorinka et al 1987);
* pathologies of the neck,
* prior and actual shoulder or neck pain caused by an accident,
* skin disease in the neck or shoulder area,
* BMI \> 30,
* sleep disorders (e.g. apnea, restless legs syndrome),
* use of medications such as psychotropic drugs, muscle relaxants or analgesics within the last 3 days prior to the experiment,
* pregnancy.
* any shoulder/neck pain on the day before the experiment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Turin, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Lausanne

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Läubli, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal Institute of Technology Zurich

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

32003B_160207

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Art and Surface Electromyography (EMG)
NCT00731991 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2