Early Allograft Failure Simplified Estimation (EASE) in Liver Transplantation

NCT ID: NCT03858088

Last Updated: 2019-03-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2350 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-15

Study Completion Date

2019-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A variety of clinical scores have been developed with the intent to predict early allograft failure after liver transplantation. With the present study the investigators aim to validate the recently published L-GrAFT Score on a multicenter cohort from 14 liver transplant centers in Italy.

Secondly, after identifying coefficients which are peculiar for the Italian transplant population, the investigators aim to develop a novel, simplified model for the estimation of early allograft failure (EASE Score).

Thirdly, the investigators plan to validate the EASE Score on a population from two liver transplant centers in the United Kingdom.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the gold standard treatment for end-stage liver disease. The broadening of indications has caused a growing gap between patients on the waiting list and those who receive a transplant with the consequence of patients still dying while awaiting to be transplanted.

This phenomenon has led the transplant community to expand the donors pool, thus including organs with a higher risk profile. The so called marginal organs carry a higher risk of failure especially in the early post-transplant phase. Early allograft failure (EAF) is known as a poor prognostic factor for patient survival.Treatment of graft failure is based on re-transplantation (Re-LT).

However, there are no clear-cut clinical/biochemical parameters to base the decision of Re-LT on. In addition, to which extent EAF is irreversible is not entirely predictable. Such prediction has been the objective of extensive research and debate as it can guide the physicians through the decision whether or not re-transplanting a recipient of a failing graft.

The availability of an easy algorithm to quickly identify the cases who are irreversibly heading towards graft failure and need re-LT is highly desirable.

Various definitions of EAF have been introduced but they all share the same limitation of being based on a dichotomous evaluation of biochemical parameters (e.g. AST, INR, bilirubin, etc. below or above a certain cut-off level).

Recently, a new score has been developed with the aim of overcoming this limitation: the Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation (L-GrAFT). This score not only provides a tool to diagnose EAF but also assesses the severity and the evolution of EAF using the kinetics of a set of biochemical parameters. However, L-GrAFT is predictive of EAF at 90 days, is based on 31 biochemical determinations and has not been validated in a multicenter setting.

With the present study the investigators aim:

1. to evaluate the performance of the L-GrAFT score and its ability to predict graft loss in the early post-operative phase (i.e. 90 days after LT) in a cohort of patients who received a primary LT from 2016 to 2017 in one of 14 LT Centers based in Italy, analyzing their prospectively maintained databases with a minimum follow up of 6 months;
2. to develop a simplified algorithm, derived from the L-GrAFT algorithm, based on the Italian LT population, reducing the number of determinations allowing an easier data entry, which is predictive of EAF at 90 (90dEASE Score) and also at 30 days post LT (30dEASE Score);
3. to validate the EASE scores on a population internal to the Italian database, using bootstrap methodology;
4. to validate the EASE scores on an external UK liver transplant Cohort. The investigators are planning to present the results of the study in international congresses and meetings and after that to produce a manuscript.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Transplant Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Training set

Cohort of consecutive liver transplants performed in 2016-2017 from 14 liver transplant centers in Italy

Liver transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Liver transplantation from deceased donors

Validation set

Cohort of consecutive liver transplants performed in 2016-2017 from 2 liver transplant centers in the United Kingdom

Liver transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Liver transplantation from deceased donors

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Liver transplantation

Liver transplantation from deceased donors

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary liver transplants from deceased donors

Exclusion Criteria

* combined transplants (liver transplanted simultaneously with another organ transplant)
* living donor liver transplant
* domino liver transplant
* pediatric transplants
* HIV+ recipients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

73 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Padova

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

A.O. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ospedali Riuniti Ancona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda Cà Granda

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Alfonso Avolio

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alfonso W Avolio, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

[email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Agopian VG, Harlander-Locke MP, Markovic D, Dumronggittigule W, Xia V, Kaldas FM, Zarrinpar A, Yersiz H, Farmer DG, Hiatt JR, Busuttil RW. Evaluation of Early Allograft Function Using the Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation Risk Score Model. JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):436-444. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5040.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29261831 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Prot. 35355/18 ID:2232

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antibodies and Liver Retransplantation
NCT03815864 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Tissue Microdialysis Monitoring of Liver Grafts
NCT06890234 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION