Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Phase 3 Efficacy Study of Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution (AGN-190584) in Participants With Presbyopia (NCT NCT03857542)
NCT ID: NCT03857542
Last Updated: 2021-12-29
Results Overview
Visual acuity for near (40 centimeter (cm)) and distance (4 meter (m)) targets were measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. High contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was assessed binocularly (in each eye) using the provided visual acuity charts for distance vision in a room with mesopic lighting conditions measured at the target. Forced choice letter by-letter scoring was used for each test and the total number of correct letters or the highest value (number) of the grid identified (as applicable) were recorded. Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 candelas per square meter (cd/m\^2) measured at the target. DCNVA= distance-corrected near visual acuity.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
427 participants
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
2021-12-29
Participant Flow
Distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) measurements at 1 site were not conducted correctly at the screening and baseline visits; all participants from this site were excluded from efficacy analyses.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Vehicle
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine hydrochloride (HCl) ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
215
|
212
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
209
|
207
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Vehicle
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine hydrochloride (HCl) ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Reason not Specified
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Phase 3 Efficacy Study of Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution (AGN-190584) in Participants With Presbyopia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=215 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=212 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Total
n=427 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.48 • n=5 Participants
|
49.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.71 • n=7 Participants
|
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.60 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
162 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
138 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
300 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
174 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
175 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
349 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
171 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
347 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Missing data was imputed as non-responders; excluding data from 1 site.
Visual acuity for near (40 centimeter (cm)) and distance (4 meter (m)) targets were measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. High contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was assessed binocularly (in each eye) using the provided visual acuity charts for distance vision in a room with mesopic lighting conditions measured at the target. Forced choice letter by-letter scoring was used for each test and the total number of correct letters or the highest value (number) of the grid identified (as applicable) were recorded. Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 candelas per square meter (cd/m\^2) measured at the target. DCNVA= distance-corrected near visual acuity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=203 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=196 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA, Without Losing More Than 5 Letters of Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular CDVA With the Same Refractive Correction at Day 30, Hour 3
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
26.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 6)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Missing data was imputed as non-responders; excluding data from 1 site.
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m\^2 measured at the target. Percentage of participants with 3 lines or more improvement from Baseline in mesopic, high-contrast DCNVA are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=203 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=196 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 6
|
9.9 percentage of participants
|
16.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 8)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at Baseline and timepoint; excluding data from 1 site.
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m\^2 measured at the target. Baseline for efficacy was defined as the last non-missing efficacy assessment before the first dose of study intervention. Percentage of participants with 3 lines or more improvement from Baseline in mesopic, high-contrast DCNVA are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=197 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=193 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular, DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 8
|
8.6 percentage of participants
|
14.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 0.5)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis; excluding data from 1 site.
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. Mesopic condition was defined as lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m\^2 measured at the target. Mixed effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=197 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=193 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA Letters at Day 30, Hour 0.5
|
4.7 letters read correctly
Standard Error 0.44
|
8.8 letters read correctly
Standard Error 0.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 30 (Hour 1)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis; excluding data for 1 site.
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in photopic conditions using an eye chart. Photopic condition was defined as high lighting ≥80 cd/m\^2 measured at the target.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=198 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=193 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20/40 or Better in Photopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 1
|
82.8 percentage of participants
|
92.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis; excluding data for 1 site. ANCOVA was used for the analysis.
NVPTQ had 12 questions on 4 reading tasks(reading a paragraph from book, excerpts from a newspaper article, portion of a nutrition label, and a section from restaurant menu). Participants completed specific reading tasks under mesopic conditions without any near-vision correction and answered 3 questions for each task, rated as 0=I could not read any text due to problems seeing up close,1=poor,2=fair,3=good,4=very good,5=excellent; impact of squinting as 0=No,I did not squint, 1=Yes, squinting helped me read some/all text, 2=Yes,but I still could not read any of the text; and satisfaction as 0=very dissatisfied to 4=very satisfied. The score based on vision-related ability and impact of squinting=(Book testlet+Newspaper testlet+Menu testlet+Nutrition Label testlet)/(testlets with non-missing responses), total possible score of 0-5. Higher scores=better outcomes;positive change from Baseline=improved performance (reading ability).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=197 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=192 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mesopic Near Vision Presbyopia Task-based Questionnaire (NVPTQ) Performance Score at Day 30, Hour 3
|
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis; excluding data from 1 site.
Visual acuity for intermediate (66 cm) target was measured in photopic conditions using an eye chart. Photopic condition was defined as high lighting ≥80 cd/m\^2 measured at the target. MMRM was used for the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=198 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=193 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Photopic, High-contrast, Binocular Distance-corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) Letters at Day 30, Hour 3
|
2.9 number of letters read correctly
Standard Error 0.38
|
6.4 number of letters read correctly
Standard Error 0.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 10)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at Baseline and timepoint; excluding data from 1 site.
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m\^2measured at the target. Percentage of participants with 3 lines or more improvement from Baseline in mesopic, high-contrast, binocular DCNVA are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=195 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=191 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular, DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 10
|
8.7 percentage of participants
|
12.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 0.25)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis; excluding data from 1 site.
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m\^2 measured at the target. MMRM was used for the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=196 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=193 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA Letters at Day 30, Hour 0.25
|
3.9 letters read correctly
Standard Error 0.41
|
6.5 letters read correctly
Standard Error 0.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 30 (Hour 3)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) targets was measured in photopic conditions using an eye chart. Photopic condition was defined as high lighting ≥80 cd/m\^2 measured at the target.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=198 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=193 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20/40 or Better in Photopic, High-contrast, Binocular, DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 3
|
77.8 percentage of participants
|
90.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. ANCOVA is used for the analysis.
NVPTQ had 12 questions on 4 reading tasks(reading a paragraph from book, excerpts from a newspaper article, portion of a nutrition label, and a section from restaurant menu). Participants completed specific reading tasks under mesopic conditions without any near-vision correction and answered 3 questions for each task, related as 0=I could not read any text due to problems seeing up close,1=poor,2=fair,3=good,4=very good,5=excellent; impact of squinting as 0=No, I did not squint, 1=Yes, squinting helped me read some/all text, 2=Yes, but I still could not read any of the text; and satisfaction as 0=very dissatisfied to 4=very satisfied. NVPTQ Satisfaction Score=(Book testlet+Newspaper testlet+Menu testlet+Nutrition Label testlet)/(testlets with non-missing responses)based on satisfaction items for a total possible score of 0 to 4. Higher scores=better outcomes; a positive change from Baseline indicates higher satisfaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=197 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=192 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mesopic NVPTQ Satisfaction Score at Day 30, Hour 3
|
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. ANCOVA was used for the analysis.
PICQ=20 questions about impact experienced by participants due to their problems over past 7 days.PICQ Coping domain had 8 items: 1:Normal-sized text,2:Small-sized text,3:Information on a computer,4:Information on a cell phone,5:Increase font size,6:Use glasses to read close,12:Hold reading materials farther out/closer,13:Squint to read. Each item had response categories:0=never to 4=all the time. Items 3, 4, 5, and 6 had additional response categories with values of 9/10 to indicate the question is not applicable to participant and were assigned missing values.PICQ Coping Score:(Item 1,2 Testlet+Item 3,4 Testlet+Item 5+Item 6+Item 12+Item 13)/non-missing responses to the 6 components of coping score where Items 1,2 Testlet=(Item1+Item2)/non-missing responses to Items 1,2;Items 3,4 Testlet=(Item3+Item4)/non-missing responses to Items 3, 4. Score ranges:0=to least amount of coping to 4=greatest amount of coping. Higher scores=poorer outcome; a negative change from Baseline=improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=197 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=193 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Presbyopia Coping Questionnaire (PICQ) Coping Score at Day 30, Hour 3
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. ANCOVA was used for the analysis.
PICQ had 20 questions about impact experienced by participants due to their problems seeing up over past 7 days. Impact domain of PICQ has 6 items:Item9:Rely on others,Item15:rest eyes,Item16:Feel older,Item17:Feel self-conscious,Item19:Take longer to complete task,Item20:Inconvenient.First 5 impacts items include response ranges from 0=never to 4=all of time. Item20 ranged from 0=Not at all,to 4=Extremely. Item9 included an additional response category, labeled with value of 9 to indicate question is not applicable because participant did not have opportunity to experience impact responses are assigned missing values. PICQ Impacts Score=\[(Items 9+15+16\&17 Testlet+Item19+Item20)/(nonmissing responses to 5 components of impacts score)\] where Items 16\&17 Testlet=(Items16+17)/non-missing responses to Items16 and 17. PICQ Impact score ranged 0-4, 0=least amount of impacts,4=greatest amount of impacts. Higher scores correspond to poorer outcomes; negative change from Baseline=improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=197 Participants
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=193 Participants
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in PICQ Impact Score at Day 30, Hour 3
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
Adverse Events
Vehicle
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=215 participants at risk
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=212 participants at risk
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.47%
1/215 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
0.00%
0/212 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Guillain-Barre syndrome
|
0.47%
1/215 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
0.00%
0/212 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=215 participants at risk
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
n=212 participants at risk
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.1%
11/215 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
15.6%
33/212 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival hyperaemia
|
5.1%
11/215 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
7.1%
15/212 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.47%
1/215 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
6.1%
13/212 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain
|
1.4%
3/215 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
5.7%
12/212 • First dose of study drug intervention to within 30 days after last dose (Up to 60 days)
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER