Circulating Cell-Free Tumor DNA Testing in Guiding Treatment for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03844620
Last Updated: 2026-01-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-29
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Exploiting Circulating Tumour DNA to Intensify the Postoperative Treatment Resected Colon Cancer Patients
NCT05062889
Investigate the Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Patients With Positive ctDNA After Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for a Stage III Colorectal Cancer
NCT06197425
Circulating Tumor DNA Testing in Predicting Treatment for Patients With Stage IIA Colon Cancer After Surgery
NCT04068103
Trial Evaluating 3-year Disease Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision or Non-operative Management
NCT02008656
Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy to Treat Rectal Cancer
NCT00807911
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To evaluate the ability of early change in circulating tumor-derived deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) (ctDNA-early dynamic changes \[EDC\] or A ctDNA) during systemic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to predict radiographic progression (only standard of care \[SOC\] arm).
II. To evaluate differences in clinically significant treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of interest (grade 3/4 toxicity per National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0, intolerable grade 2 toxicity or any toxicity requiring dose reduction) between SOC and ctDNA arm.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between SOC and ctDNA arm.
II. To compare Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) duration of complete response (DCR) (partial response \[PR\] and stable disease \[SD\]) between SOC and ctDNA arm.
III. To evaluate differences in overall survival (OS) between SOC and ctDNA arm.
IV. To evaluate differences between SOC and ctDNA arm with regards to emergency severity indices (ESIs): Hospitalizations/emergency room visits.
V. To evaluate differences between SOC and ctDNA arm with regards to ESIs: Need for medical interventions (blood transfusions and intravenous \[IV\] hydration).
VI. To evaluate cost-effectiveness associated with both strategies, i.e. SOC strategy and ctDNA strategy in treatment of mCRC.
VII. To compare time to deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) between SOC and ctDNA arms.
VIII. To compare time to deterioration of PROs between SOC and ctDNA arms. IX. To evaluate differences in proportion of patients referred to clinical trial after completion of therapy between SOC and ctDNA arms.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo ctDNA testing and depending on the results receive either regorafenib orally (PO) on days 1-21, trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) PO twice daily (BID) on days 1-5 and 8-12, or regorafenib PO on days 1-21 and TAS-102 PO BID on days 1-5 and 8-12. Treatment repeats every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive regorafenib or TAS-102 per standard of care. Treatment continues in the event of disease stability or regression as per discretion of treating physician or absence of disease progression.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 2 weeks and then monthly for up to 18 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (ctDNA testing, regorafenib, TAS-102)
Patients will receive either regorafenib by mouth on days 1-21 every 28 day cycle or TAS-102 by mouth twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 every 28 day cycle. Patients in this arm will get ctDNA testing and will continue treatment beyond 1st cycle depending on ctDNA results. Beyond that patients will continue treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Laboratory Procedure
Undergo ctDNA testing
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Regorafenib
Given by mouth
Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride
Given by mouth
Arm II (SOC)
Patients will receive either regorafenib by mouth on days 1-21 every 28 day cycle or TAS-102 by mouth twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 every 28 day cycle as per standard of care. Patients in this arm will continue treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Best Practice
Receive SOC
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Regorafenib
Given by mouth
Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride
Given by mouth
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Best Practice
Receive SOC
Laboratory Procedure
Undergo ctDNA testing
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Regorafenib
Given by mouth
Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride
Given by mouth
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must have advanced or metastatic disease with no curative options.
* Patients must have radiographically evaluable disease.
* Patients must have had at least 2 prior therapies for mCRC (including fluorouracil \[5-FU\], oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bevacizumab; cetuximab/panitumumab \[for RAS wild type (WT) patients\]) and have either progressed on or intolerant to these agents or use of these agents is contraindicated.
* Patients must be clinically eligible for either regorafenib or TAS-102 as per their treating physician.
* Patients must have a negative serum pregnancy test done less than are equal to 14 days prior to randomization for women of childbearing potential only. Women of child bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry for the duration of study participation.
* Patients must have ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance.
* Patients must have ability to provide informed written consent.
* Patients must be willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up as per study schedule.
* Patients must be willing to provide blood samples for correlative studies.
* Any of the following: Pregnant or nursing women, men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception.
* Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens.
Exclusion Criteria
* Congestive heart failure \> New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2, unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest), new-onset angina (begun within the last 3 months) or myocardial infarction less than 3 months prior to randomization.
* Ongoing infection \> grade 2 CTCAE version 4.0.
* Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors unless the patient is \> 3 months from definitive therapy, has a negative imaging study within 4 weeks of randomization and is clinically stable with respect to brain lesions at the time of randomization (Note: patient must not be undergoing acute steroid therapy or taper \[chronic steroid therapy is acceptable provided that the dose is stable for one month prior to and following screening radiographic studies\]).
* Renal failure requiring hematological or peritoneal dialysis.
* Patients unable to swallow oral medications.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kanwal Raghav
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2019-00246
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2018-0233
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2018-0233
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.