Trial Outcomes & Findings for Commensal Oral Microbiota in Head and Neck Cancer (NCT NCT03843554)
NCT ID: NCT03843554
Last Updated: 2025-09-26
Results Overview
World Health Organization's Oral Toxicity Scale (WHO OTS): Oral mucositis severity as measured by the WHO OTS; severity is graded 0 through 4, with 4 being the worst. Grade 0 (none), Grade 1 (oral soreness, erythema), Grade 2 (ulceration, solid diet tolerated), Grade 3 (ulceration, liquid diet only), and Grade 4 (nothing by mouth).
TERMINATED
NA
60 participants
Week 1 (Day 0/Randomization) - Week 8 (Day 56) during radiation therapy. Change from Baseline to Final Intervention Visit (FIV) is the endpoint being analyzed at this single timepoint (Day 56 relative to Day 0).
2025-09-26
Participant Flow
H\&N cancer patients were recruited to achieve 120 study subjects. The primary recruitment of 60 subjects was done through the UPenn Cancer Center. The sponsor/NIDCR prematurely ceased enrollment in proton therapy. Afterwards, the sponsor terminated the trial with 50% enrollment due to "under-enrollment into specific diverse racial, ethnic, and sex/gender categories." As a result, the analysis are presented for all randomized subjects (30 per arm).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
n=30 Participants
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
n=30 Participants
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces.
|
Total
n=60 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • The ARMOR Trial employed a two-arm (OMDP vs STANDARD) parallel group design. The goal was to randomize 120 subjects within the 4 strata defined by planned cancer treatment (IMRT versus Proton, with or w/o chemotherapy). The first subject was randomized on 10/11/2019. On 2/19/2021, the study team received a NIDCR/DSMB letter recommending discontinuing enrollment for subjects receiving Proton beam therapy. The trial was closed by the NIDCR on 08/03/22.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 (Day 0/Randomization) - Week 8 (Day 56) during radiation therapy. Change from Baseline to Final Intervention Visit (FIV) is the endpoint being analyzed at this single timepoint (Day 56 relative to Day 0).Population: 60 randomized subjects, 30 per arm.
World Health Organization's Oral Toxicity Scale (WHO OTS): Oral mucositis severity as measured by the WHO OTS; severity is graded 0 through 4, with 4 being the worst. Grade 0 (none), Grade 1 (oral soreness, erythema), Grade 2 (ulceration, solid diet tolerated), Grade 3 (ulceration, liquid diet only), and Grade 4 (nothing by mouth).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
n=30 Participants
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
n=30 Participants
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
Oral Mucosal Severity (Grade 3 or 4)
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and final intervention visit.Population: Inflammation markers were summarized by treatment group, visit and sample type using standard descriptive statistics. The impact of each treatment arm on the change from Baseline to Final Intervention Visit (FIV) for the above inflammation markers was examined and inferential tests such as two-sided t-test (for continuous inflammation scores change).
Salivary cytokines: Levels of Th1/Th2-type cytokines IL10, IL8, IL12p70, TNF alpha, IL4, IL1b, IL2, IL13, IL5, and IFN gamma will be assessed, in addition to levels of gp340.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
n=30 Participants
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
n=30 Participants
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inflammatory Markers Correlative Measures
IL4
|
7.7 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 30.0
|
-12.7 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 34.9
|
|
Inflammatory Markers Correlative Measures
IL5
|
2.2 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
0.5 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
|
Inflammatory Markers Correlative Measures
IL1a
|
53.9 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 84.4
|
50.6 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 152.9
|
|
Inflammatory Markers Correlative Measures
IL1b
|
30.4 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 26.5
|
13.3 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 44.9
|
|
Inflammatory Markers Correlative Measures
IL2
|
37.9 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 39.2
|
-64.3 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 249.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and visits 1-9 interval during radiation therapy (area under the curve).OM severity (Grade 3 or more) was measured by a blinded member of the study team using the WHO OTS (previously described) and the duration and time to onset of severe OM measured in days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
n=30 Participants
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
n=30 Participants
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of OM Severity
|
0.667 weeks
Interval 0.125 to 2.056
|
0.433 weeks
Interval 0.052 to 1.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 (Day 0/Randomization) - Week 8 (Day 56) during radiation therapy. Change from Baseline to Final Intervention Visit (FIV) is the endpoint being analyzed at this single timepoint (Day 56 relative to Day 0).Saliva flow rate (mL/minute) from baseline to subsequent visits was assessed by a 5-minute stimulated saliva collection. The outcome analyzed was the change from baseline to subsequent visits in saliva.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
n=30 Participants
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
n=30 Participants
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
Salivary Hypofunction
|
-0.878 mL/minute
Standard Error 0.0822
|
-0.821 mL/minute
Standard Error 0.0822
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 (Day 0/Randomization) - Week 8 (Day 56) during radiation therapy. Change from Baseline to Final Intervention Visit (FIV) is the endpoint being analyzed at this single timepoint (Day 56 relative to Day 0).The average pain of OM was measured subjectively (visual analog scale 0-10) and obtained by having subjects complete a questionnaire with questions based on an eleven-point numeric scale regarding oral pain (0 being no pain and 10 being maximum pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
n=30 Participants
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
n=30 Participants
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Scores
|
-7.39 0-10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
5.45 0-10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 (Day 0/Randomization) - Week 8 (Day 56) during radiation therapy. Change from Baseline to Final Intervention Visit (FIV) is the endpoint being analyzed at this single timepoint (Day 56 relative to Day 0).Quality of life and function was assessed using the validated EORTC-QLQ-C30 for head and neck cancers. This questionnaire assesses general quality of life as well as issues specific to head and neck cancer patients (e.g. difficulty swallowing, pain, dry mouth). The analysis was focused on EORTC-QLC30 Questions 31 through 48. High scores indicate better QOL. High scores for the Sypmton Scale are indicative of deterioration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
n=30 Participants
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home.
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
n=30 Participants
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
QOL and Function
|
0.323 0-100 score on a scale
Interval 0.152 to 0.494
|
0.135 0-100 score on a scale
Interval -0.0333 to 0.303
|
Adverse Events
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene
n=30 participants at risk
Standard of Care Oral Hygiene group (SOC-OH): Subjects assigned to SOC-OH will attend weekly oral care visits where they will have their teeth brushed with a soft bristled toothbrush by the interventionist. No treatment to the oral mucosa will be provided to this group as part of the intervention. Subjects will receive oral care instructions and will be asked to follow SOC oral hygiene instructions at home. Standard of Care Oral Hygiene: Standard of care oral hygiene- weekly oral care visits with soft-bristled toothbrushing.
|
Oral Mucosal Deterging and Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP)
n=30 participants at risk
Oral Mucosal Deterging \& Dental Prophylaxis (OMDP) protocol: Subjects assigned to OMDP will attend weekly intervention visits during which they will have their teeth cleaned and will receive the OMDP intervention as follows: subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces. Subjects will be asked to follow OMDP oral hygiene instructions at home.
Oral mucosal deterging and dental prophylaxis: Subjects will receive a professional dental prophylaxis including periodontal surface debridement \[a light-touch, gentle form of instrumentation performed with an ultrasonic instrument to promote plaque removal, to facilitate biofilm disruption and endotoxin flushing, but yet with the preservation of the periodontal cementum\] and deterging of the oral mucosal surfaces\].
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangiocarcinoma
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neck mass
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
|
Social circumstances
Adult failure to thrive
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gout acute
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Percentages and numbers of participants were used to summarize AEs and SAEs. AEs record all related adverse events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation in source documents. At each study visit, the investigator inquired about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. Events were followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
Serious Adverse Events: 5 subjects in Arm 1 and 0 subjects in Arm 0 experienced an AE graded as severe. 4 of those AE's were also classified as serious. No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study treatment and/or procedures.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Associate Vice Chancelor, Clinical Trials Operations
University of Pittsburgh
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place