Trial Outcomes & Findings for Prevalence and Characteristics of Transthyretin Amyloidosis in Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy of Unknown Etiology (NCT NCT03842163)
NCT ID: NCT03842163
Last Updated: 2024-02-12
Results Overview
Percentage of participants with cardiac fixation on a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD or 99mTc-PYP or 999mTc-HMDP among participants with LVH from an undiagnosed etiology were reported in this outcome measure. Scintigraphy was defined at each bone site according to the standard grading: Grade 0 = absent cardiac uptake, Grade 1=mild uptake less than bone, Grade 2=moderate uptake equal to bone and Grade 3=high uptake greater than bone.
COMPLETED
812 participants
During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)
2024-02-12
Participant Flow
Data of participants diagnosed with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 years of age were observed in this study.
Data from eligible participants were retrieved and observed from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
812
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set 1
|
766
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set 2 (Subset of FAS 1)
|
245
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set 3 (Subset of FAS 2)
|
208
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set 3.1
|
137
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set 3.2
|
56
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
766
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
46
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
All Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Did not meet inclusion criteria (age less than 50 years)
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Scintigraphy was not performed
|
44
|
Baseline Characteristics
Prevalence and Characteristics of Transthyretin Amyloidosis in Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy of Unknown Etiology
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Participants
n=766 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
72.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
233 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
533 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
665 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian & Portuguese (or Portuguese parents)
|
47 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African
|
21 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
27 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS1 included all participants who met eligibility criteria and with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP.
Percentage of participants with cardiac fixation on a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD or 99mTc-PYP or 999mTc-HMDP among participants with LVH from an undiagnosed etiology were reported in this outcome measure. Scintigraphy was defined at each bone site according to the standard grading: Grade 0 = absent cardiac uptake, Grade 1=mild uptake less than bone, Grade 2=moderate uptake equal to bone and Grade 3=high uptake greater than bone.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=766 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Fixation at the Radionuclide Bone Scintigraphy and/or Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT): FAS1
|
32.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.8 to 35.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 1 included all participants who met eligibility criteria and with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP.
Transthyretin amyloidosis is a slowly progressive condition characterized by the buildup of abnormal deposits of a protein called amyloid (amyloidosis) in the body's organs and tissues.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=766 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTR): FAS 1
|
17.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 20.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 1 included all participants who met eligibility criteria and with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP.
Transthyretin amyloidosis is a slowly progressive condition characterized by the buildup of abnormal deposits of a protein called amyloid (amyloidosis) in the body's organs and tissues.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=766 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With ATTR or With Suspicion of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) / Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL): FAS 1
|
25.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.3 to 28.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Percentage of participants with hereditary ATTRv were reported in this outcome measure. ATTR participants with a ATTR gene sequencing with variant transthyretin was considered as ATTRv.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTRv): Full Analysis Set 2 (FAS 2)
|
6.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 10.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Percentage of participants with hereditary ATTRv were reported in this outcome measure. ATTR participants with a ATTR gene sequencing with variant transthyretin was considered as ATTRv.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTRv): Full Analysis Set 3 (FAS 3)
|
6.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.1 to 11.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Percentage of participants with hereditary ATTRv were reported in this outcome measure. ATTR participants with a ATTR gene sequencing with variant transthyretin was considered as ATTRv.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTRv): FAS 3.1
|
8.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.9 to 14.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Percentage of participants with hereditary ATTRv were reported in this outcome measure. ATTR participants with a ATTR gene sequencing with variant transthyretin was considered as ATTRv.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTRv): FAS 3.2
|
3.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 12.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Percentage of participants with ATTRwt were reported in this outcome measure. ATTR participants with a ATTR gene sequencing with a result of 'no mutation' was considered as ATTRwt.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Wild Type Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTRwt): FAS 2
|
93.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 89.2 to 96.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Percentage of participants with ATTRwt were reported in this outcome measure. ATTR participants with a ATTR gene sequencing with a result of 'no mutation' was considered as ATTRwt.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Wild Type Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTRwt): FAS 3
|
93.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 88.5 to 95.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Percentage of participants with ATTRwt were reported in this outcome measure. ATTR participants with a ATTR gene sequencing with a result of 'no mutation' was considered as ATTRwt.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Wild Type Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTRwt): FAS 3.1
|
91.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 85.2 to 95.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Percentage of participants with ATTRwt were reported in this outcome measure. ATTR participants with a ATTR gene sequencing with a result of 'no mutation' was considered as ATTRwt.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Wild Type Transthyretin Amyloid (ATTRwt): FAS 3.2
|
96.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 87.5 to 99.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Scintigraphy is the procedure used to diagnose, stage, and monitor disease. A small amount of a radioactive chemical (radionuclide) was injected into a vein or swallowed. Number of participants with TTR genetic mutations among those who had positive scintigraphy were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=200 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Genetic Mutations Among Those Who Had Positive Scintigraphy: FAS 2
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Scintigraphy is the procedure used to diagnose, stage, and monitor disease. A small amount of a radioactive chemical (radionuclide) was injected into a vein or swallowed. Number of participants with TTR genetic mutations among those who had positive scintigraphy were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Genetic Mutations Among Those Who Had Positive Scintigraphy: FAS 3
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Scintigraphy is the procedure used to diagnose, stage, and monitor disease. A small amount of a radioactive chemical (radionuclide) was injected into a vein or swallowed. Number of participants with TTR genetic mutations among those who had positive scintigraphy were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=127 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Genetic Mutations Among Those Who Had Positive Scintigraphy: FAS 3.1
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Scintigraphy is the procedure used to diagnose, stage, and monitor disease. A small amount of a radioactive chemical (radionuclide) was injected into a vein or swallowed. Number of participants With TTR genetic mutations among those who had positive scintigraphy were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=54 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Genetic Mutations Among Those Who Had Positive Scintigraphy: FAS 3.2
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS1 included all participants who met eligibility criteria and with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP.
Percentage of participants with any of the familial history of known CM, PN or SCD among their relatives were reported in this outcome measure. Family history for each disease was considered for 1st degree parent, siblings, and 2nd/3rd grade family. CM was defined by the presence of a left ventricular (LV) wall thickness greater than or equal to (\>=) 15 mm in one or more LV myocardial segments that is not explained solely by abnormal loading conditions. Polyneuropathy was defined as the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body. SCD was defined as death due to a cardiovascular cause that occurs within one hour of the onset of symptoms. A sudden cardiac arrest occurs when the heart stops beating or is not beating sufficiently to maintain perfusion and life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=766 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Any Familial History of Known Cardiomyopathy (CM), Polyneuropathy (PN) or Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) Among Their Relatives (Parents, Siblings and 2nd /3rd Grade Family): FAS 1
|
17.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.6 to 19.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Percentage of participants with any of the familial history of known CM, PN or SCD among their relatives were reported in this outcome measure. Family history for each disease was considered for 1st degree parent, siblings, and 2nd/3rd grade family. CM was defined by the presence of a LV wall thickness \>= 15 mm in one or more LV myocardial segments that is not explained solely by abnormal loading conditions. Polyneuropathy was defined as the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body. SCD was defined as death due to a cardiovascular cause that occurs within one hour of the onset of symptoms. A sudden cardiac arrest occurs when the heart stops beating or is not beating sufficiently to maintain perfusion and life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Any Familial History of Known Cardiomyopathy (CM), Polyneuropathy (PN) or Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) Among Their Relatives (Parents, Siblings and 2nd /3rd Grade Family): FAS 2
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.4 to 16.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Percentage of participants with any of the familial history of known CM, PN or SCD among their relatives were reported in this outcome measure. Family history for each disease was considered for 1st degree parent, siblings, and 2nd/3rd grade family. CM was defined by the presence of a LV wall thickness \>= 15 mm in one or more LV myocardial segments that is not explained solely by abnormal loading conditions. Polyneuropathy was defined as the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body. SCD was defined as death due to a cardiovascular cause that occurs within one hour of the onset of symptoms. A sudden cardiac arrest occurs when the heart stops beating or is not beating sufficiently to maintain perfusion and life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Any Familial History of Known Cardiomyopathy (CM), Polyneuropathy (PN) or Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) Among Their Relatives (Parents, Siblings and 2nd /3rd Grade Family): FAS 3
|
9.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.3 to 14.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Percentage of participants with any of the familial history of known CM, PN or SCD among their relatives were reported in this outcome measure. Family history for each disease was considered for 1st degree parent, siblings, and 2nd/3rd grade family. CM was defined by the presence of a LV wall thickness \>= 15 mm in one or more LV myocardial segments that is not explained solely by abnormal loading conditions. Polyneuropathy was defined as the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body. SCD was defined as death due to a cardiovascular cause that occurs within one hour of the onset of symptoms. A sudden cardiac arrest occurs when the heart stops beating or is not beating sufficiently to maintain perfusion and life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Any Familial History of Known Cardiomyopathy (CM), Polyneuropathy (PN) or Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) Among Their Relatives (Parents, Siblings and 2nd /3rd Grade Family): FAS 3.1
|
10.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.7 to 17.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Percentage of participants with any of the familial history of known CM, PN or SCD among their relatives were reported in this outcome measure. Family history for each disease was considered for 1st degree parent, siblings, and 2nd/3rd grade family. CM was defined by the presence of a LV wall thickness \>= 15 mm in one or more LV myocardial segments that is not explained solely by abnormal loading conditions. Polyneuropathy was defined as the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body. SCD was defined as death due to a cardiovascular cause that occurs within one hour of the onset of symptoms. A sudden cardiac arrest occurs when the heart stops beating or is not beating sufficiently to maintain perfusion and life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Any Familial History of Known Cardiomyopathy (CM), Polyneuropathy (PN) or Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) Among Their Relatives (Parents, Siblings and 2nd /3rd Grade Family): FAS 3.2
|
7.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 17.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants with at least one red flag in the neurological part of the ATTR-Amyloidosis red flags Electronic Case Report Form (e-CRF) part was considered as participants with a senso-motor polyneuropathy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Senso-Motor Polyneuropathy: FAS 2
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 74.5 to 84.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants with at least one red flag in the neurological part of the ATTR-Amyloidosis red flags e-CRF part was considered as participants with a senso-motor polyneuropathy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Senso-Motor Polyneuropathy: FAS 3
|
86.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 80.7 to 90.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Participants with at least one red flag in the neurological part of the ATTR-Amyloidosis red flags e-CRF part was considered as participants with a senso-motor polyneuropathy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Senso-Motor Polyneuropathy: FAS 3.1
|
89.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 83.6 to 93.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Participants with at least one red flag in the neurological part of the ATTR-Amyloidosis red flags e-CRF part was considered as participants with a senso-motor polyneuropathy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Senso-Motor Polyneuropathy: FAS 3.2
|
85.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 74.3 to 92.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
CTS was defined as a common neurological disorder that occurs when the median nerve, which runs from your forearm into the palm of the hand, becomes pressed or squeezed at the wrist. Participants with a CTS were participants with a bilateral or unilateral CTS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS): FAS 2
|
48.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 42.4 to 54.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
CTS was defined as a common neurological disorder that occurs when the median nerve, which runs from your forearm into the palm of the hand, becomes pressed or squeezed at the wrist. Participants with a CTS were participants with a bilateral or unilateral CTS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS): FAS 3
|
54.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 48.0 to 61.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
CTS was defined as a common neurological disorder that occurs when the median nerve, which runs from your forearm into the palm of the hand, becomes pressed or squeezed at the wrist. Participants with a CTS were participants with a bilateral or unilateral CTS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS): FAS 3.1
|
60.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 52.2 to 68.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
CTS was defined as a common neurological disorder that occurs when the median nerve, which runs from your forearm into the palm of the hand, becomes pressed or squeezed at the wrist. Participants with a CTS were participants with a bilateral or unilateral CTS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS): FAS 3.2
|
48.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.7 to 61.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants with autonomic dysfunction were participants with at least one autonomic sign or autonomic symptom = "Yes".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Autonomic Dysfunction: FAS 2
|
55.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 49.7 to 62.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants with autonomic dysfunction were participants with at least one autonomic sign or autonomic symptom = "Yes".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Autonomic Dysfunction: FAS 3
|
58.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 51.9 to 65.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Participants with autonomic dysfunction were participants with at least one autonomic sign or autonomic symptom = "Yes".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Autonomic Dysfunction: FAS 3.1
|
61.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.0 to 69.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Participants with autonomic dysfunction were participants with at least one autonomic sign or autonomic symptom = "Yes".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Autonomic Dysfunction: FAS 3.2
|
57.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 44.1 to 69.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants with cardiological manifestations was defined as participants with at least one of the following criteria fulfilled from data collected from e-CRF: cardiological assessments: atrial fibrillation (yes permanent), pacemaker (yes), AICD (yes); in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) part: LGE (positive); electrocardiogram (ECG) part: PR interval less than (\<) 80 milliseconds (ms) or greater than (\>) 350 ms QRS interval \< 60 ms or \> 250 ms, Sokolow index \< 1 mm or \> 70 mm, pseudo MI pattern (yes), PPOr precordial R wave progression(yes), LBBB, RBBB, paced and intraventricular conduct delay (ticked), LVOT (yes), if longitudinal strain is done, strain apical preserved (yes), LV end-diastolic diameter \<20 mm or \>80 mm, MWT \<15 mm or \>100 mm, MWT at septum \<3 mm or \>50 mm, MWT posterior wall \<3 mm or \>50 mm, LV mass index \<40 g/m\^2 or \>160 g/m\^2, Maximal aortic velocity \>5 m/s, Mean gradient of Aortic valvular stenosis \>70 mmHg, Area of Aortic valvular stenosis \<0.2 cm\^2 or \>3 cm\^2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cardiological Manifestations: FAS 2
|
98.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 95.3 to 99.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants with cardiological manifestations was defined as participants with at least one of the following criteria fulfilled from data collected from e-CRF: cardiological assessments: atrial fibrillation (yes permanent), pacemaker (yes), AICD (yes); in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) part: LGE (positive); electrocardiogram (ECG) part: PR interval \< 80 ms or \> 350 ms QRS interval \< 60 ms or \> 250 ms, Sokolow index \< 1 mm or \> 70 mm, pseudo MI pattern (yes), PPOr precordial R wave progression(yes), LBBB, RBBB, paced and intraventricular conduct delay (ticked), LVOT (yes), if longitudinal strain is done, strain apical preserved (yes), LV end-diastolic diameter \<20 mm or \>80 mm, MWT \<15 mm or \>100 mm, MWT at septum \<3 mm or \>50 mm, MWT posterior wall \<3 mm or \>50 mm, LV mass index \<40 g/m\^2 or \>160 g/m\^2, Maximal aortic velocity \>5 m/s, Mean gradient of Aortic valvular stenosis \>70 mmHg, Area of Aortic valvular stenosis \<0.2 cm\^2 or \>3 cm\^2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cardiological Manifestations: FAS 3
|
98.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 95.2 to 99.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Participants with cardiological manifestations was defined as participants with at least one of the following criteria fulfilled from data collected from e-CRF: cardiological assessments: atrial fibrillation (yes permanent), pacemaker (yes), AICD (yes); in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) part: LGE (positive); electrocardiogram (ECG) part: PR interval \< 80 ms or \> 350 ms QRS interval \< 60 ms or \> 250 ms, Sokolow index \< 1 mm or \> 70 mm, pseudo MI pattern (yes), PPOr precordial R wave progression(yes), LBBB, RBBB, paced and intraventricular conduct delay (ticked), LVOT (yes), if longitudinal strain is done, strain apical preserved (yes), LV end-diastolic diameter \<20 mm or \>80 mm, MWT \<15 mm or \>100 mm, MWT at septum \<3 mm or \>50 mm, MWT posterior wall \<3 mm or \>50 mm, LV mass index \<40 g/m\^2 or \>160 g/m\^2, Maximal aortic velocity \>5 m/s, Mean gradient of Aortic valvular stenosis \>70 mmHg, Area of Aortic valvular stenosis \<0.2 cm\^2 or \>3 cm\^2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cardiological Manifestations: FAS 3.1
|
97.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 93.8 to 99.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Participants with cardiological manifestations was defined as participants with at least one of the following criteria fulfilled from data collected from e-CRF: cardiological assessments: atrial fibrillation (yes permanent), pacemaker (yes), AICD (yes); in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) part: LGE (positive); electrocardiogram (ECG) part: PR interval \< 80 ms or \> 350 ms QRS interval \< 60 ms or \> 250 ms, Sokolow index \< 1 mm or \> 70 mm, pseudo MI pattern (yes), PPOr precordial R wave progression(yes), LBBB, RBBB, paced and intraventricular conduct delay (ticked), LVOT (yes), if longitudinal strain is done, strain apical preserved (yes), LV end-diastolic diameter \<20 mm or \>80 mm, MWT \<15 mm or \>100 mm, MWT at septum \<3 mm or \>50 mm, MWT posterior wall \<3 mm or \>50 mm, LV mass index \<40 g/m\^2 or \>160 g/m\^2, Maximal aortic velocity \>5 m/s, Mean gradient of Aortic valvular stenosis \>70 mmHg, Area of Aortic valvular stenosis \<0.2 cm\^2 or \>3 cm\^2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cardiological Manifestations: FAS 3.2
|
98.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 90.6 to 99.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Laboratory parameters that were considered as out of range included creatinine \<45 micromole per liter (μmol/L) or greater than 104 μmol/L w; haemoglobin, participants with a value lower than 11.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) or higher than 16 g/dL was considered as out of range; Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) value higher than 100 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL); N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), value higher than 125 pg/mL; Troponin I value higher than 26 pg/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 2
Creatinine out of range
|
37.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.7 to 43.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 2
Haemoglobin out of range
|
30.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.8 to 36.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 2
BNP out of range
|
62.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 56.7 to 68.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 2
NTproBNP out of range
|
81.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 75.9 to 85.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 2
Troponin I out of range
|
3.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.9 to 6.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Laboratory parameters that were considered as out of range included creatinine \<45 μmol/L or greater than 104 μmol/L w; haemoglobin value lower than 11.5 g/dL or higher than 16 g/dL was considered as out of range; Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) value higher than 100 pg/mL; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), value higher than 125 pg/mL; Troponin I value higher than 26 pg/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3
Creatinine out of range
|
42.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.8 to 49.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3
Haemoglobin out of range
|
33.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.1 to 39.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3
BNP out of range
|
69.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 63.2 to 75.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3
NTproBNP out of range
|
88.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 84.0 to 92.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3
Troponin I out of range
|
3.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 7.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Laboratory parameters that were considered as out of range included creatinine \<45 μmol/L or greater than 104 μmol/L w; haemoglobin value lower than 11.5 g/dL or higher than 16 g/dL was considered as out of range; Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) value higher than 100 pg/mL; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), value higher than 125 pg/mL; Troponin I value higher than 26 pg/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.1
Creatinine out of range
|
34.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.9 to 42.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.1
Haemoglobin out of range
|
34.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.9 to 42.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.1
BNP out of range
|
68.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 60.4 to 75.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.1
NTproBNP out of range
|
90.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 84.4 to 94.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.1
Troponin I out of range
|
4.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 9.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Laboratory parameters that were considered as out of range included creatinine \<45 μmol/L or greater than 104 μmol/L w; haemoglobin value lower than 11.5 g/dL or higher than 16 g/dL was considered as out of range; Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) value higher than 100 pg/mL; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), value higher than 125 pg/mL; Troponin I value higher than 26 pg/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.2
Creatinine out of range
|
58.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 45.9 to 70.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.2
Haemoglobin out of range
|
35.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.5 to 48.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.2
BNP out of range
|
89.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 78.5 to 95.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.2
NTproBNP out of range
|
98.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 90.6 to 99.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: FAS 3.2
Troponin I out of range
|
1.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.3 to 9.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS1 included all participants who met eligibility criteria and with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP.
Participants were classified according to presence of neurological red flag as 'Yes' or 'No'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=766 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Presence of Neurological Red Flag: FAS1
Yes
|
143 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Presence of Neurological Red Flag: FAS1
No
|
623 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants were classified according to presence of neurological red flag as 'Yes' or 'No'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Presence of Neurological Red Flag: FAS 2
Yes
|
142 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Presence of Neurological Red Flag: FAS 2
No
|
103 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS1 included all participants who met eligibility criteria and with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Grade of scintigraphy evaluated by the investigator and Grade of SPECT: Grade 0 = absent cardiac uptake, Grade 1=mild uptake less than bone, Grade 2=moderate uptake equal to bone and Grade 3=high uptake greater than bone. Only categories with non-zero values were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=75 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Discrepancies Between Scintigraphy Result and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Result: FAS1
Investigator: Grade 0; SPECT: Grade 0
|
43 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Discrepancies Between Scintigraphy Result and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Result: FAS1
Investigator: Grade 0; SPECT: Grade 1
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Discrepancies Between Scintigraphy Result and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Result: FAS1
Investigator: Grade 1; SPECT: Grade 1
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Discrepancies Between Scintigraphy Result and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Result: FAS1
Investigator: Grade 2; SPECT: Grade 2
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Discrepancies Between Scintigraphy Result and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Result: FAS1
Investigator: Grade 3; SPECT: Grade 3
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were evaluated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=238 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiological Assessments - Blood Pressure: FAS 2
DBP
|
75.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
|
Cardiological Assessments - Blood Pressure: FAS 2
SBP
|
132.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 20.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
SBP and DBP were evaluated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=203 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiological Assessments - Blood Pressure: FAS 3
DBP
|
74.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
|
Cardiological Assessments - Blood Pressure: FAS 3
SBP
|
131.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
SBP and DBP were evaluated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=133 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiological Assessments - Blood Pressure: FAS 3.1
DBP
|
75.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
|
Cardiological Assessments - Blood Pressure: FAS 3.1
SBP
|
130.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
SBP and DBP were evaluated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=55 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiological Assessments - Blood Pressure: FAS 3.2
DBP
|
74.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
|
Cardiological Assessments - Blood Pressure: FAS 3.2
SBP
|
131.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 20.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Clinical parameters' assessment for hypertension, antihypertensive medication, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, lumbar spinal stenosis, carpal tunnel syndrome was categorized as 'Yes' and 'No', where Yes indicated presence and No indicated absence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Diagnosed hypertension · No
|
78 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Diagnosed hypertension · Yes
|
167 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Antihypertensive medication · No
|
89 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Antihypertensive medication · Yes
|
156 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Coronary artery disease · No
|
184 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Coronary artery disease · Yes
|
61 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Renal insufficiency · No
|
177 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Renal insufficiency · Yes
|
68 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Diabetes Mellitus · No
|
193 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Diabetes Mellitus · Yes
|
52 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Lumbar spinal stenosis · No
|
221 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Lumbar spinal stenosis · Yes
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Carpal tunnel syndrome · No
|
164 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 2
Carpal tunnel syndrome · Yes
|
81 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Clinical parameters' assessment for hypertension, antihypertensive medication, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, lumbar spinal stenosis, carpal tunnel syndrome was categorized as 'Yes' and 'No', where Yes indicated presence and No indicated absence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Diagnosed hypertension · No
|
77 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Diagnosed hypertension · Yes
|
131 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Antihypertensive medication · No
|
88 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Antihypertensive medication · Yes
|
120 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Coronary artery disease · No
|
162 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Coronary artery disease · Yes
|
46 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Renal insufficiency · No
|
147 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Renal insufficiency · Yes
|
61 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Diabetes Mellitus · No
|
175 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Diabetes Mellitus · Yes
|
33 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Lumbar spinal stenosis · No
|
184 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Lumbar spinal stenosis · Yes
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Carpal tunnel syndrome · No
|
130 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3
Carpal tunnel syndrome · Yes
|
78 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Clinical parameters' assessment for hypertension, antihypertensive medication, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, lumbar spinal stenosis, carpal tunnel syndrome was categorized as 'Yes' and 'No', where Yes indicated presence and No indicated absence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Diagnosed hypertension · No
|
49 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Diagnosed hypertension · Yes
|
88 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Antihypertensive medication · No
|
57 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Antihypertensive medication · Yes
|
80 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Coronary artery disease · No
|
112 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Coronary artery disease · Yes
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Renal insufficiency · No
|
102 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Renal insufficiency · Yes
|
35 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Diabetes Mellitus · No
|
118 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Diabetes Mellitus · Yes
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Lumbar spinal stenosis · No
|
121 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Lumbar spinal stenosis · Yes
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Carpal tunnel syndrome · No
|
80 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.1
Carpal tunnel syndrome · Yes
|
57 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Clinical parameters' assessment for hypertension, antihypertensive medication, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, lumbar spinal stenosis, carpal tunnel syndrome was categorized as 'Yes' and 'No', where Yes indicated presence and No indicated absence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Lumbar spinal stenosis · No
|
50 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Diagnosed hypertension · No
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Diagnosed hypertension · Yes
|
37 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Antihypertensive medication · No
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Antihypertensive medication · Yes
|
34 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Coronary artery disease · No
|
43 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Coronary artery disease · Yes
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Renal insufficiency · No
|
35 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Renal insufficiency · Yes
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Diabetes Mellitus · No
|
45 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Diabetes Mellitus · Yes
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Lumbar spinal stenosis · Yes
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Carpal tunnel syndrome · No
|
37 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to History of Clinical Parameters at Baseline: FAS 3.2
Carpal tunnel syndrome · Yes
|
19 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants classified according to NYHA class as Class I, Class II, Class III, Class IV were reported in this outcome measure. Class I: no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, such as shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs. Class II: mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III: marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, such as walking short distances (20-100 meters), comfortable only at rest. Class IV: severe limitations and experienced symptoms even while at rest, mostly bedbound participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 2
Class I
|
50 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 2
Class II
|
130 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 2
Class III
|
57 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 2
Class IV
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 2
Missing data
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants classified according to NYHA class as Class I, Class II, Class III, Class IV were reported in this outcome measure. Class I: no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, such as shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs. Class II: mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III: marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, such as walking short distances (20-100 meters), comfortable only at rest. Class IV: severe limitations and experienced symptoms even while at rest, mostly bedbound participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3
Class I
|
45 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3
Class II
|
112 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3
Class III
|
45 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3
Class IV
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3
Missing data
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Participants classified according to NYHA class as Class I, Class II, Class III, Class IV were reported in this outcome measure. Class I: no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, such as shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs. Class II: mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III: marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, such as walking short distances (20-100 meters), comfortable only at rest. Class IV: severe limitations and experienced symptoms even while at rest, mostly bedbound participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.1
Class I
|
34 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.1
Class II
|
69 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.1
Class III
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.1
Class IV
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.1
Missing data
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Participants classified according to NYHA class as Class I, Class II, Class III, Class IV were reported in this outcome measure. Class I: no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, such as shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs. Class II: mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III: marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, such as walking short distances (20-100 meters), comfortable only at rest. Class IV: severe limitations and experienced symptoms even while at rest, mostly bedbound participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.2
Class I
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.2
Class II
|
38 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.2
Class III
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class: FAS 3.2
Class IV
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants were classified according to presence of atrial fibrillation as 'No', 'Yes permanent', 'Yes in the past' and were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 2
No
|
120 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 2
Yes permanent
|
90 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 2
Yes in the past
|
35 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants were classified according to presence of atrial fibrillation as 'No', 'Yes permanent', 'Yes in the past' and were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3
No
|
105 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3
Yes permanent
|
78 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3
Yes in the past
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Participants were classified according to presence of atrial fibrillation as 'No', 'Yes permanent', 'Yes in the past' and were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3.1
No
|
65 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3.1
Yes permanent
|
52 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3.1
Yes in the past
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Participants were classified according to presence of atrial fibrillation as 'No', 'Yes permanent', 'Yes in the past' and were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3.2
No
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3.2
Yes permanent
|
23 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Assessment: FAS 3.2
Yes in the past
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants who used pacemaker and ICD were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=245 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 2
Pacemaker · Yes
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 2
Pacemaker · No
|
215 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 2
ICD · Yes
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 2
ICD · No
|
245 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3.
Participants who used pacemaker and ICD were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=208 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3
Pacemaker · Yes
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3
Pacemaker · No
|
178 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3
ICD · Yes
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3
ICD · No
|
208 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis).
Participants who used pacemaker and ICD were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3.1
Pacemaker · Yes
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3.1
Pacemaker · No
|
117 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3.1
ICD · Yes
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3.1
ICD · No
|
137 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Participants who used pacemaker and ICD were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3.2
Pacemaker · Yes
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3.2
Pacemaker · No
|
49 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3.2
ICD · Yes
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Pacemaker and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD): FAS 3.2
ICD · No
|
56 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants with MRI scan performed using LGE classified as 'negative' and 'positive' were reported in this outcome measure. LGE was defined as method where cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images were obtained after the administration of gadolinium contrast material that accumulated into a tissue with increased extra cellular space.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Performed Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): FAS 2
Negative
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Performed Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): FAS 2
Positive
|
55 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants with MRI scan performed using LGE classified as 'negative' and 'positive' were reported in this outcome measure. LGE was defined as method where cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images were obtained after the administration of gadolinium contrast material that accumulated into a tissue with increased extra cellular space.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=57 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Performed Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): FAS 3
Negative
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Performed Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): FAS 3
Positive
|
50 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants with MRI scan performed using LGE classified as 'negative' and 'positive' were reported in this outcome measure. LGE was defined as method where cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images were obtained after the administration of gadolinium contrast material that accumulated into a tissue with increased extra cellular space.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=39 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Performed Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): FAS 3.1
Negative
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Performed Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): FAS 3.1
Positive
|
33 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants with MRI scan performed using LGE classified as 'negative' and 'positive' were reported in this outcome measure. LGE was defined as method where cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images were obtained after the administration of gadolinium contrast material that accumulated into a tissue with increased extra cellular space.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=13 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Performed Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): FAS 3.2
Negative
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Performed Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): FAS 3.2
Positive
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants classified according to assessment for ECG for paced participants as 'Yes' or 'No' were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=235 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Assessment for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Paced: FAS 2
No
|
217 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Assessment for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Paced: FAS 2
Yes
|
18 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants classified according to assessment for ECG for paced participants as 'Yes' or 'No' were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=200 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Assessment for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Paced: FAS 3
No
|
182 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Assessment for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Paced: FAS 3
Yes
|
18 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants classified according to assessment for ECG for paced participants as 'Yes' or 'No' were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=132 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Assessment for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Paced: FAS 3.1
No
|
122 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Assessment for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Paced: FAS 3.1
Yes
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants classified according to assessment for ECG for paced participants as 'Yes' or 'No' were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=55 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Assessment for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Paced: FAS 3.2
No
|
49 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Assessment for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Paced: FAS 3.2
Yes
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=214 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Heart Rate Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 2
|
73.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=179 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Heart Rate Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3
|
73.2 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=121 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Heart Rate Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3.1
|
73.4 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=48 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Heart Rate Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3.2
|
72.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=227 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 2
No
|
86 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 2
Yes
|
135 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 2
Missing
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=190 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3
No
|
72 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3
Yes
|
114 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3
Missing
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=127 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3.1
No
|
51 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3.1
Yes
|
73 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3.1
Missing
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=50 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3.2
No
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3.2
Yes
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Sinus Rhythm Parameter for Participants Without Paced: FAS 3.2
Missing
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sokolow index is calculated as sum of the amplitude of the S wave in in right precordial lead V1 and the amplitude of the highest R wave in left precordial leads V5 or V6. If the result is greater than 35 mm, it is suggestive of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=180 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Sokolow Index: FAS 2
|
19.1 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 8.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sokolow index is calculated as sum of the amplitude of the S wave in in right precordial lead V1 and the amplitude of the highest R wave in left precordial leads V5 or V6. If the result is greater than 35 mm, it is suggestive of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=148 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Sokolow Index: FAS 3
|
18.7 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sokolow index is calculated as sum of the amplitude of the S wave in in right precordial lead V1 and the amplitude of the highest R wave in left precordial leads V5 or V6. If the result is greater than 35 mm, it is suggestive of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=103 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Sokolow Index: FAS 3.1
|
19.8 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sokolow index is calculated as sum of the amplitude of the S wave in in right precordial lead V1 and the amplitude of the highest R wave in left precordial leads V5 or V6. If the result is greater than 35 mm, it is suggestive of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=39 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Sokolow Index: FAS 3.2
|
16.5 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 8.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVEF was defined as the central measure of left ventricular systolic function. LVEF was the fraction of stroke volume (volume ejected in systole) in relation to the volume of the blood in the ventricle at the end of diastole volume (EDV). LVEF was presented in percentage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=241 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF): FAS 2
|
55.0 Percentage of blood volume
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVEF was defined as the central measure of left ventricular systolic function. LVEF was the fraction of stroke volume (volume ejected in systole) in relation to the volume of the blood in the ventricle at the end of diastole volume (EDV). LVEF was presented in percentage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=205 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF): FAS 3
|
55.2 Percentage of blood volume
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVEF was defined as the central measure of left ventricular systolic function. LVEF was the fraction of stroke volume (volume ejected in systole) in relation to the volume of the blood in the ventricle at the end of diastole volume (EDV). LVEF was presented in percentage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=134 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF): FAS 3.1
|
55.7 Percentage of blood volume
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
LVEF was defined as the central measure of left ventricular systolic function. LVEF was the fraction of stroke volume (volume ejected in systole) in relation to the volume of the blood in the ventricle at the end of diastole volume (EDV). LVEF was presented in percentage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF): FAS 3.2
|
53.9 Percentage of blood volume
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVOT is defined as limitation of blood flow out of the left ventricle. The level of obstruction can be valvular, sub-valvular, or supravalvular. In this outcome measure participants were categorized as Yes or No on the basis of presence or absence of LVOT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=241 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOT): FAS 2
No
|
215 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOT): FAS 2
Yes
|
26 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVOT is defined as limitation of blood flow out of the left ventricle. The level of obstruction can be valvular, sub-valvular, or supravalvular. In this outcome measure participants were categorized as Yes or No on the basis of presence or absence of LVOT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=205 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOT): FAS 3
No
|
183 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOT): FAS 3
Yes
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVOT is defined as limitation of blood flow out of the left ventricle. The level of obstruction can be valvular, sub-valvular, or supravalvular. In this outcome measure participants were categorized as Yes or No on the basis of presence or absence of LVOT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=136 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOT): FAS 3.1
No
|
119 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOT): FAS 3.1
Yes
|
17 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
LVOT is defined as limitation of blood flow out of the left ventricle. The level of obstruction can be valvular, sub-valvular, or supravalvular. In this outcome measure participants were categorized as Yes or No on the basis of presence or absence of LVOT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOT): FAS 3.2
No
|
51 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOT): FAS 3.2
Yes
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were classified according to strain apical preserved as 'No' and 'Yes'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Categorized According to Perseverance of Strain Apical: FAS 2
No
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Categorized According to Perseverance of Strain Apical: FAS 2
Yes
|
62 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were classified according to strain apical preserved as 'No' and 'Yes'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=86 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Categorized According to Perseverance of Strain Apical: FAS 3
No
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Categorized According to Perseverance of Strain Apical: FAS 3
Yes
|
60 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were classified according to strain apical preserved as 'No' and 'Yes'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=62 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Categorized According to Perseverance of Strain Apical: FAS 3.1
No
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Categorized According to Perseverance of Strain Apical: FAS 3.1
Yes
|
46 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were classified according to strain apical preserved as 'No' and 'Yes'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=20 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Categorized According to Perseverance of Strain Apical: FAS 3.2
No
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Categorized According to Perseverance of Strain Apical: FAS 3.2
Yes
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) reflects the size of cardiac as well as left ventricular function. It was associated with progressive left ventricular insufficiency.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=218 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
LV End Diastolic Diameter: FAS 2
|
43.3 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 7.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVEDD reflects the size of cardiac as well as left ventricular function. It was associated with progressive left ventricular insufficiency.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=182 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
LV End Diastolic Diameter: FAS 3
|
43.2 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 7.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVEDD reflects the size of cardiac as well as left ventricular function. It was associated with progressive left ventricular insufficiency.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=120 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
LV End Diastolic Diameter: FAS 3.1
|
43.2 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LVEDD reflects the size of cardiac as well as left ventricular function. It was associated with progressive left ventricular insufficiency.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=50 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
LV End Diastolic Diameter: FAS 3.2
|
44.4 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 6.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=240 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Maximum Wall Thickness: FAS 2
|
17.4 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=204 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Maximum Wall Thickness: FAS 3
|
17.5 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=136 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Maximum Wall Thickness: FAS 3.1
|
17.9 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Maximum Wall Thickness: FAS 3.2
|
16.9 Millimeter
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were classified according to hypertrophic pattern as apical, concentric, asymmetric and mix.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=240 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 2
Apical
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 2
Concentric
|
179 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 2
Asymmetric
|
47 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 2
Mix
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were classified according to hypertrophic pattern as apical, concentric, asymmetric and mix.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=204 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3
Apical
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3
Concentric
|
159 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3
Asymmetric
|
37 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3
Mix
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were classified according to hypertrophic pattern as apical, concentric, asymmetric and mix.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=135 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3.1
Apical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3.1
Concentric
|
105 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3.1
Asymmetric
|
27 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3.1
Mix
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Participants were classified according to hypertrophic pattern as apical, concentric, asymmetric and mix.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3.2
Apical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3.2
Concentric
|
46 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3.2
Asymmetric
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants According to Type of Hypertrophic Pattern: FAS 3.2
Mix
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Left ventricular mass (LVM) is the weight of the left ventricle, typically estimated using echocardiography, and is thought to represent the cumulative effect of blood pressure on the heart. Closely related to body size, greater in men than in women, and increases with age. LVMI = LVM (left ventricular mass)/body surface area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=146 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
LV Mass Index (LVMI): FAS 2
|
172.7 Grams per meter square
Standard Deviation 64.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Left ventricular mass (LVM) is the weight of the left ventricle, typically estimated using echocardiography, and is thought to represent the cumulative effect of blood pressure on the heart. Closely related to body size, greater in men than in women, and increases with age. LVMI = LVM (left ventricular mass)/body surface area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=115 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
LV Mass Index (LVMI): FAS 3
|
177.0 Grams per meter square
Standard Deviation 53.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Left ventricular mass (LVM) is the weight of the left ventricle, typically estimated using echocardiography, and is thought to represent the cumulative effect of blood pressure on the heart. Closely related to body size, greater in men than in women, and increases with age. LVMI = LVM (left ventricular mass)/body surface area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=75 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
LV Mass Index (LVMI): FAS 3.1
|
177.0 Grams per meter square
Standard Deviation 48.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis).
Left ventricular mass (LVM) is the weight of the left ventricle, typically estimated using echocardiography, and is thought to represent the cumulative effect of blood pressure on the heart. Closely related to body size, greater in men than in women, and increases with age. LVMI = LVM (left ventricular mass)/body surface area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
LV Mass Index (LVMI): FAS 3.2
|
185.5 Grams per meter square
Standard Deviation 62.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 2 included all eligible participants with a radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Aortic valve stenosis is a type of heart valve disease (valvular heart disease). The valve between the lower left heart chamber and the body's main artery (aorta) is narrowed and doesn't open fully. This reduces or blocks blood flow from the heart to the aorta and to the rest of the body. Parameters needed to classify the aortic valve stenosis: peak transvalvular velocity, mean pressure gradient and aortic valve area. Here, aortic valve area is reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=146 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Aortic Valvular Stenosis - Aortic Valve Area: FAS 2
|
2.3 Centimeter square
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3 included all eligible participants with radionuclide bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT performed with 99mTc-DPD/99mTc-PYP/99mTc-HMDP and with grading of cardiac retention equal to grade 2 or grade 3. Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Aortic valve stenosis is a type of heart valve disease (valvular heart disease). The valve between the lower left heart chamber and the body's main artery (aorta) is narrowed and doesn't open fully. This reduces or blocks blood flow from the heart to the aorta and to the rest of the body. Parameters needed to classify the aortic valve stenosis: peak transvalvular velocity, mean pressure gradient and aortic valve area. Here, aortic valve area is reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=123 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Aortic Valvular Stenosis - Aortic Valve Area: FAS 3
|
2.2 Centimeter square
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.1 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 without monoclonal protein abnormalities (ATTR amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Aortic valve stenosis is a type of heart valve disease (valvular heart disease). The valve between the lower left heart chamber and the body's main artery (aorta) is narrowed and doesn't open fully. This reduces or blocks blood flow from the heart to the aorta and to the rest of the body. Parameters needed to classify the aortic valve stenosis: peak transvalvular velocity, mean pressure gradient and aortic valve area. Here, aortic valve area is reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=83 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Aortic Valvular Stenosis - Aortic Valve Area: FAS 3.1
|
2.3 Centimeter square
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During collection and observation duration from 09-Jul-2018 to 08-Jun-2022 (approximately 3.11 years)Population: FAS 3.2 included all eligible participants with grade 2-3 with monoclonal protein abnormalities (undefined etiology, cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, or MGUS or AL amyloidosis). Here, ''Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Aortic valve stenosis is a type of heart valve disease (valvular heart disease). The valve between the lower left heart chamber and the body's main artery (aorta) is narrowed and doesn't open fully. This reduces or blocks blood flow from the heart to the aorta and to the rest of the body. Parameters needed to classify the aortic valve stenosis: peak transvalvular velocity, mean pressure gradient and aortic valve area. Here, aortic valve area is reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=34 Participants
Participants diagnosed with LVH of unknown etiology confirmed by bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were included.
|
|---|---|
|
Aortic Valvular Stenosis - Aortic Valve Area: FAS 3.2
|
2.0 Centimeter square
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
Adverse Events
All Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER