Comparison of Trough Level- and Clinical-based Spacing of Infliximab Infusions in Patients With IBD in Deep Remission

NCT ID: NCT03841942

Last Updated: 2024-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-26

Study Completion Date

2023-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of trough level-based spacing and clinical-based spacing of infliximab infusions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in deep remission A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled Study

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Infliximab (IFX) is common treatment for refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (5 mg/kg/8 weeks in maintenance). A large majority of IBD patients treated with IFX are currently in long-term clinical remission under maintenance IFX monotherapy or cotherapy with azathioprine or methotrexate. There is no recommendation on optimal duration of anti-TNF therapy once it is started. A key question is to know if the treatment could be stopped/decreased without clinical relapse. Anti-TNF therapy is also a major burden in health care costs in France. Identifying an optimal duration of anti-TNF therapy and criteria for stopping/decreasing could help in lowering these therapies cost without altering disease control. Prospective studies have investigated the withdrawal of IFX in IBD patients showing 50% of clinical relapse at 1 year in patient in clinical remission, 30% in patients in deep remission.

Another alternative to deescalate anti-TNF treatment would be to increase the infusion interval without stopping the drug. Indeed, this infusion interval spacing is strongly requested by patients who seek an improvement in their quality of life. This empirical spacing corresponded to an increase of the infusion interval to 10 weeks then to 12 weeks maximum in patients with persistent clinical remission. In France and in Europe, even if there is no recommendation about infliximab de-escalation and increase of the infusion interval, many physicians have already performed empirically an infliximab infusion interval spacing in IBD patients in longstanding remission while on infliximab maintenance therapy. This empirical infusion interval increase in patients in clinical remission leads to a clinical relapse in 30% of these patients with a median delay of 12.6 months (IQR: 10.4- 18.4) (Dufour et al. UEGW 2017).

Since the last ten years, it was demonstrated that the serum level of infliximab measured just before the last infliximab infusion (defined as a trough level) is correlated to the clinical activity of the disease1. A serum IFX trough level between 3 and 7 ug/ml has been identified as therapeutic with more clinical relapse in patients with IFX \< 3 ug/ml and safe dose reduction in patients with IFX trough level \> 7 ug/ml.

Thus, we hypothesized that using the determination of serum infliximab trough level could decrease the risk of clinical relapse observed in IBD patients who underwent an empirical infliximab infusion interval spacing (approximatively 30% of the cases). Indeed, in an infliximab trough level-based spacing strategy, only patients with a supratherapeutic (\>7ug/ml) infliximab trough level would have a spacing of infliximab infusion.

The aim of our study is to compare an IFX infusion interval spacing strategy based on IFX trough level with an IFX infusion interval spacing strategy based on clinical evaluation for maintaining clinical and biological remission in IBD patients in deep remission.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

clinically-based spacing

All patients (as there are free from symptoms) after inclusion will have a spacing of their infliximab infusion interval which will be maintained until the end of the study.

Group Type OTHER

clinically-based spacing strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

All patients (as there are free from symptoms) will have a first step of a 2 weeks spacing of their infliximab infusion interval. Then, at the next infliximab infusion, if clinical remission is maintained (CDAI \< 150 for CD, Partial Mayo score \< 3 for UC), patients will have a second step of a 2 weeks infliximab infusion spacing which will be maintained until the end of the study.

Trough level-based spacing

Only patients with a baseline infliximab trough level ≥ 7 ug/ml will have a spacing of their infliximab infusion interval which will be maintained until the end of the study. Patients with a baseline infliximab trough level \< 7 ug/ml will keep their baseline infliximab infusion interval until the end of the study.

Group Type OTHER

Trough level-based strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

patients will have at inclusion a determination of the infliximab trough level. According to this dosage, only patients with a trough level ≥ 7 µg/ml will have a first step of a 2 weeks spacing of their infliximab infusion interval. Then, at the next infliximab infusion, if clinical remission (CDAI \< 150 for CD, Partial Mayo score \< 3 for UC) is maintained and if infliximab trough level is still ≥ 7 ug/ml, patients will have a second step of 2 weeks infliximab spacing until the end of the study.

Patients with a baseline infliximab trough level \< 7 ug/ml will keep their baseline infliximab infusion interval until the end of the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

clinically-based spacing strategy

All patients (as there are free from symptoms) will have a first step of a 2 weeks spacing of their infliximab infusion interval. Then, at the next infliximab infusion, if clinical remission is maintained (CDAI \< 150 for CD, Partial Mayo score \< 3 for UC), patients will have a second step of a 2 weeks infliximab infusion spacing which will be maintained until the end of the study.

Intervention Type OTHER

Trough level-based strategy

patients will have at inclusion a determination of the infliximab trough level. According to this dosage, only patients with a trough level ≥ 7 µg/ml will have a first step of a 2 weeks spacing of their infliximab infusion interval. Then, at the next infliximab infusion, if clinical remission (CDAI \< 150 for CD, Partial Mayo score \< 3 for UC) is maintained and if infliximab trough level is still ≥ 7 ug/ml, patients will have a second step of 2 weeks infliximab spacing until the end of the study.

Patients with a baseline infliximab trough level \< 7 ug/ml will keep their baseline infliximab infusion interval until the end of the study.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than 18 years

* Patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis according to clinical, biological, morphological and endoscopic criteria defined by the ECCO guidelines22, 23
* Patients in deep remission since at least 6 months17:

* CDAI \< 150 for CD, Partial Mayo score \< 3 for UC
* CRP (C reactive protein) \< 10 mg/l
* CDEIS \< 6 (\<3 in each segment) for CD, Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 for UC
* For CD patients with small bowel disease: No ulceration on MRI, only asymptomatic fibrotic stenosis without inflammation and retro dilatation. No ulceration on wireless capsule endoscopy if feasible
* For patients with perianal disease: No active draining fistula, or perianal abscess on clinical exam and MRI
* Treatment with infliximab at stable dose (5mg/kg) with a stable interval for at least 4 months
* Infliximab trough level \> 3 ug/ml
* No change in other IBD therapies in the past 4 months
* Signed informed consent form
* Subjects must be able to attend all scheduled visits and to comply with all trial procedures
* Subjects must be covered by public health insurance

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject unable to read or/and write

* Planned longer stay outside the region that prevents compliance with the visit plan
* Subject who are in a dependency or employment with the sponsor or the investigator
* Participation in another clinical trial or administration of an unapproved drug within the last 4 weeks before the screening date
* Previous withdrawal or spacing over 8 weeks of infliximab therapy
* Infliximab therapy at 10 mg/kg
* Patients who have presented a severe acute or delayed reaction to infliximab.
* Active perianal/abdominal fistulae at time of inclusion, defined by active drainage
* Patients with ostomy or ileoanal pouch
* Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study
* Inability to follow study procedures as judged by the investigator
* Steroid use ≤3 months prior to screening
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Guillaume Pineton de Chambrun

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU of Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amiens University Hospital

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Besançon University Hospital

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux University Hospital

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Caen University Hospital

Caen, , France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Lille University Hospital

Lille, , France

Site Status

Pineton de Chambrun

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHRU Nancy - Hôpitaux de Brabois

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Nantes University Hospital

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nice University Hospital

Nice, , France

Site Status

Nîmes University Hospital

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

APHP Beaujon Hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status

APHP Paris Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rennes University Hospital

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Saint Etienne University Hospital

Saint-Etienne, , France

Site Status

Toulouse University Hospital

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL18_0024 7596

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.