Trial Outcomes & Findings for Glucagon Ready-to-Use (RTU) for Prevention of Exercise-Induced Hypoglycemia During Aerobic Exercise in Adults With T1D (NCT NCT03841526)
NCT ID: NCT03841526
Last Updated: 2025-08-22
Results Overview
Mean incidence rate of hypoglycemia during and after sessions of moderate to high intensity aerobic exercise in 12-week Outpatient Phase. Incidence rate is defined as the number of hypoglycemic events divided by the total number of qualified exercise sessions, assessed at group level. Qualified exercise session is: (1) confirmed blood glucose of 100-180 mg/dL prior to start of exercise, (2) self-administered study drug no more than 10 min prior to exercise (5 min target), (3) conducted a protocol allowed exercise of moderate to high intensity for at least 30 min and no longer than 75 min, and (4) achieved a target heart rate of 80% of maximum calculated heart rate at least once during session. Exercise sessions were to occur at least 2-3 times per week. Only 1 qualified exercise session/subject/day was included in the analysis (the first if \>1). Hypoglycemic event defined as any hypoglycemic event occurring within 30 (+2) min after completion of a qualified exercise session.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
48 participants
Daily; During the 12-week Outpatient Phase qualified exercise sessions were assessed daily and associated hypoglycemia events were assessed continuously during and within the 30 (+2) minute period following a qualified exercise session.
2025-08-22
Participant Flow
The study enrolled 48 subjects to participate in the study with a CRC phase followed by an Outpatient phase. The 45 subjects that completed the CRC phase were re-randomized prior to entering the Outpatient phase of the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CRC: Glucagon RTU to Vehicle With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
CRC: Glucagon RTU to Vehicle With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Vehicle With 50% Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
CRC: Glucagon RTU to Vehicle With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Glucagon RTU Without Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection without reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
CRC: Vehicle to Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
CRC: Vehicle to Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Vehicle With 50% Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
CRC: Vehicle to Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Glucagon RTU Without Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection without reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRC Phase: First Treatment
STARTED
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
11
|
5
|
8
|
|
CRC Phase: First Treatment
Received 1st CRC Dose
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
11
|
5
|
8
|
|
CRC Phase: First Treatment
COMPLETED
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
11
|
5
|
8
|
|
CRC Phase: First Treatment
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
CRC Phase: Second Treatment
STARTED
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
11
|
5
|
8
|
|
CRC Phase: Second Treatment
Received 2nd CRC Dose
|
7
|
10
|
6
|
9
|
5
|
8
|
|
CRC Phase: Second Treatment
COMPLETED
|
7
|
10
|
6
|
9
|
5
|
8
|
|
CRC Phase: Second Treatment
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Outpatient Phase Treatment
STARTED
|
7
|
10
|
6
|
9
|
5
|
8
|
|
Outpatient Phase Treatment
Received at Least 1 Outpatient Dose
|
7
|
9
|
6
|
9
|
5
|
8
|
|
Outpatient Phase Treatment
COMPLETED
|
7
|
9
|
5
|
9
|
5
|
7
|
|
Outpatient Phase Treatment
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CRC: Glucagon RTU to Vehicle With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
CRC: Glucagon RTU to Vehicle With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Vehicle With 50% Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
CRC: Glucagon RTU to Vehicle With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Glucagon RTU Without Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection without reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
CRC: Vehicle to Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
CRC: Vehicle to Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Vehicle With 50% Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
CRC: Vehicle to Glucagon RTU With 50% Reduction to Outpatient: Glucagon RTU Without Reduction
CRC Phase (2-arm randomized double-blind crossover): Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump to Outpatient Phase (3-arm randomized comparison, 2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label): Glucagon RTU Injection 0.15 mg injection without reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRC Phase: Second Treatment
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
CRC Phase: Second Treatment
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Outpatient Phase Treatment
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Outpatient Phase Treatment
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Glucagon Ready-to-Use (RTU) for Prevention of Exercise-Induced Hypoglycemia During Aerobic Exercise in Adults With T1D
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Glucagon RTU Crossover to Placebo
n=24 Participants
CRC Stage: Glucagon RTU to Placebo Crossover Group (Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection crossover to vehicle injection of 30 microliters) with 50% reduction in the insulin pump
|
Placebo Crossover to Glucagon RTU
n=24 Participants
CRC Stage: Placebo to Glucagon RTU Crossover Group (vehicle injection of 30 microliters crossover to Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection) with 50% reduction in the insulin pump
|
Total
n=48 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47 • n=5 Participants
|
34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.54 • n=7 Participants
|
37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.20 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 participants
n=7 Participants
|
48 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
82.15 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.344 • n=5 Participants
|
75.91 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.769 • n=7 Participants
|
79.03 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.681 • n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
27.051 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6277 • n=5 Participants
|
26.515 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7469 • n=7 Participants
|
26.783 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6454 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily; During the 12-week Outpatient Phase qualified exercise sessions were assessed daily and associated hypoglycemia events were assessed continuously during and within the 30 (+2) minute period following a qualified exercise session.Population: All randomized subjects in the Outpatient Phase with data.
Mean incidence rate of hypoglycemia during and after sessions of moderate to high intensity aerobic exercise in 12-week Outpatient Phase. Incidence rate is defined as the number of hypoglycemic events divided by the total number of qualified exercise sessions, assessed at group level. Qualified exercise session is: (1) confirmed blood glucose of 100-180 mg/dL prior to start of exercise, (2) self-administered study drug no more than 10 min prior to exercise (5 min target), (3) conducted a protocol allowed exercise of moderate to high intensity for at least 30 min and no longer than 75 min, and (4) achieved a target heart rate of 80% of maximum calculated heart rate at least once during session. Exercise sessions were to occur at least 2-3 times per week. Only 1 qualified exercise session/subject/day was included in the analysis (the first if \>1). Hypoglycemic event defined as any hypoglycemic event occurring within 30 (+2) min after completion of a qualified exercise session.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=16 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
n=44 Participants
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outpatient Phase: Incidence Rate of Hypoglycemia During and After Moderate to High Intensity Aerobic Exercise.
|
0.12 events/session
|
0.39 events/session
|
0.16 events/session
|
0.24 events/session
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily; During the 12-week Outpatient Phase qualified exercise sessions were assessed daily and associated hypoglycemia events were assessed continuously throughout the 30 (+2) minute period following a qualified exercise session.Population: All randomized subjects in the Outpatient Phase with data.
Outpatient Phase: Mean number of hypoglycemic events associated with the qualified exercise sessions, assessed at group level. A qualified exercise session was defined as one were (1) a confirmed blood glucose value of 100-180 mg/dL prior to start of exercise, (2) self-administered the study drug no more than 10 minutes prior to exercise (5 minutes was the target), (3) conducted a protocol allowed exercise for moderate to high intensity for at least 30 minutes and no longer than 75 minutes, and (4) achieved a target heart rate of 80% of maximum calculated heart rate at least once during the session. A hypoglycemic event was defined as any hypoglycemic event occurring during or within 30 (+2) minutes after completion of a qualified exercise session. Exercise sessions were expected to occur at least 2 to 3 times per week. Only 1 qualified exercise session per subject per day was included in the analysis (the first if \>1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=16 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
n=44 Participants
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outpatient Phase: Mean Number of Hypoglycemic Events
|
1.94 mean number of events/participant
|
8.43 mean number of events/participant
|
2.86 mean number of events/participant
|
4.3 mean number of events/participant
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily; During the 12-week Outpatient Phase the occurrence of qualified exercise sessions were assessed daily.Population: All randomized subjects in the Outpatient Phase with data.
Outpatient Phase: Mean number of qualified exercise sessions, assessed at group level. A qualified exercise session was defined as one were (1) a confirmed blood glucose value of 100-180 mg/dL prior to start of exercise, (2) self-administered the study drug no more than 10 minutes prior to exercise (5 minutes was the target), (3) conducted a protocol allowed exercise for moderate to high intensity for at least 30 minutes and no longer than 75 minutes, and (4) achieved a target heart rate of 80% of maximum calculated heart rate at least once during the session. Exercise sessions were expected to occur at least 2 to 3 times per week. Only 1 qualified exercise session per subject per day was included in the analysis (the first if \>1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=16 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
n=44 Participants
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outpatient Phase: Mean Number of Qualified High Intensity Aerobic Exercise Sessions
|
15.69 mean number of sessions/participant
|
21.64 mean number of sessions/participant
|
17.36 mean number of sessions/participant
|
18.11 mean number of sessions/participant
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 1) and Visit 4 (Day 3 or any day up to Day 29); Assessed continuously 0-300 minutes following the start of the exercise session corresponding to each of the treatments during the corresponding in-clinic visit during the CRC Phase.Population: All randomized subjects in the CRC phase.
Analysis of interstitial glucose (IG) was performed by treatment, independent of the order of treatment during the randomized cross-over CRC Phase. The number of participants are categorized by the following IG levels: Below range, as defined by IG \<= 70 mg/dl (\<=3.89 mmol/L); Between range, as defined by IG between 54 to 70 mg/dL (3 to 3.89 mmol/L); Below range, as defined by IG \<54 mg/dL (\<3 mmol/L)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=48 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=48 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=48 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRC Phase: Interstitial Glucose Below Target Range
Below range (<=70 mg/dL)
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
CRC Phase: Interstitial Glucose Below Target Range
Between range (54-70 mg/dL)
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
CRC Phase: Interstitial Glucose Below Target Range
Below range (<54 mg/dL)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 1) and Visit 4 (Day 3 or any day up to Day 29); Assessed continuously 0-300 minutes following the start of each qualified exercise session corresponding to each of the treatments during the Outpatient Phase.Population: All randomized subjects in the Outpatient Phase with data.
Analysis of interstitial glucose (IG) was performed by treatment, during the randomized Outpatient Phase. The number of participants are categorized by the following IG levels: Below range, as defined by IG \<= 70 mg/dl (\<=3.89 mmol/L); Between range, as defined by IG between 54 to 70 mg/dL (3 to 3.89 mmol/L); Below range, as defined by IG \<54 mg/dL (\<3 mmol/L)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=16 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=15 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
n=45 Participants
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outpatient Phase: Interstitial Glucose Levels Below Target Range
Below range <=70 mg/dL
|
14 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Interstitial Glucose Levels Below Target Range
Between Range 54-70 mg/dL
|
14 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Interstitial Glucose Levels Below Target Range
Below range <54 mg/dL
|
11 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Insulin use measured continuously from Study Baseline to End of Study and assessed during Outpatient Phase as Change from Outpatient Phase Baseline at Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: All randomized subjects in the Outpatient Phase with change from Outpatient Phase Baseline data available at Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Insulin use as reported by subject as Change from Outpatient Phase Baseline at Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=11 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=12 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=7 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
NovoRapid (Insulin Aspart) - Change from Baseline at Week 4
|
-2.43 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 1.559
|
-1.57 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 2.558
|
-2.85 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 3.041
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
Fiasp (Insluin Aspart) - Change from Baseline at Week 4
|
-2.80 units of insulin
|
2.60 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
0.10 units of insulin
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
Fiasp (Insluin Aspart) - Change from Baseline at Week 8
|
—
|
-2.10 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 1.353
|
—
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
Fiasp (Insluin Aspart) - Change from Baseline at Week 12
|
-7.60 units of insulin
|
-1.70 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 4.808
|
—
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
Humalog (Insulin Lispro) - Change from Baseline at Week 4
|
—
|
3.05 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 1.909
|
6.20 units of insulin
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
Humalog (Insulin Lispro) - Change from Baseline at Week 8
|
0.90 units of insulin
|
7.20 units of insulin
|
3.20 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 9.758
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
Humalog (Insulin Lispro) - Change from Baseline at Week 12
|
0.60 units of insulin
|
1.05 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 3.041
|
-0.85 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 5.498
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
NovoRapid (Insulin Aspart) - Change from Baseline at Week 8
|
-0.15 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 3.901
|
-2.85 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 3.834
|
—
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Insulin Use Change From Baseline
NovoRapid (Insulin Aspart) - Change from Baseline at Week 12
|
-0.05 units of insulin
Standard Deviation 10.872
|
-4.20 units of insulin
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study measured at Outpatient Phase Baseline (Visit 3, Day 1) and Follow-up (Visit 11, 14-21 days after last exercise session, up to Day 134) or Early Termination (at time of discontinuation)Population: All randomized subjects in the Outpatient Phase with data.
Change from Baseline to End of the Outpatient Phase in Score on Barriers to Physical Activity in Type 1 Diabetes (BAPAD-1) Questionnaire A total of 12 factors were scored from 1=unlikely (min.) to 7=extremely likely (max.) for their propensity to keep the subject from practicing regular physical exercise during the next 6 months. Lower scores are considered better, while higher scores are considered worse outcomes. The higher the score (1 to 7), the less likely the subject was to engage in exercise. The mean of the scores of the 12 factors were calculated for each subject and the overall mean for the subjects was calculated at a group level with overall mean and standard deviation calculated at Baseline (Visit 3) and Follow-up/Early Termination (Visit 11) to calculate change from Baseline. Subject level and overall means could range from 1 to 7.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=16 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=15 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outpatient Phase: Barriers to Physical Activity Diabetes (Type 1): BAPAD-1 Change From Baseline
Baseline BAPAD-1 (Study Visit 3)
|
2.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.894
|
2.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.857
|
2.59 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.957
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Barriers to Physical Activity Diabetes (Type 1): BAPAD-1 Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at Follow-up in BAPAD-1 (Study Visit 11)
|
0.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.988
|
-0.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.781
|
-0.34 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.890
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Barriers to Physical Activity Diabetes (Type 1): BAPAD-1 Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at Early Termination in BAPAD-1
|
—
|
—
|
-1.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study measured at Outpatient Phase Baseline (Visit 3, Day 1) and Follow-up (Visit 11, 14-21 days after last exercise session, up to Day 134) or Early Termination (at time of discontinuation)Population: All randomized subjects in the Outpatient Phase with data.
Change from Baseline in Score on Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) A total of 33 items were scored from 0=never (min.) to 4=almost always (max.) for how often in the past 6 months they had done the following: Behavior (15 items): things that people with diabetes often do to avoid low blood sugar. Worry (18 items): things that people with diabetes often worry about because of low blood sugar. Lower scores are considered better outcomes, higher scores are considered worse outcomes. The higher the score (0 to 4), the greater the subject's fear of hypoglycemia. The mean of the scores of the 33 items were calculated for each subject and the overall mean for the subjects was calculated at a group level with overall mean and standard deviation calculated at Baseline (Visit 3) and Follow-up/Early Termination (Visit 11) to calculate change from Baseline. Subject level and overall means could range from 0 to 4.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=16 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=15 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outpatient Phase: HFS-II Overall Score Change From Baseline
Baseline
|
1.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.293
|
1.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.479
|
1.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.746
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: HFS-II Overall Score Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at Follow-up (Visit 11)
|
-0.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.424
|
-0.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.290
|
-0.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.280
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: HFS-II Overall Score Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at Early Termination
|
—
|
—
|
-0.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.849
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study measured at Outpatient Phase Baseline (Visit 3, Day 1) and Follow-up (Visit 11, 14-21 days after last exercise session, up to Day 134) or Early Termination (at time of discontinuation)Population: All randomized subjects in the Outpatient Phase with data.
Change from Baseline in Score on Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale (HCS) The 9-item scale assessed a subject's confidence about safety regarding hypoglycemia. The questionnaire had 4 responses possible for each question, ranging from 1=not confident at all (min.) to 4=very confident (max.). Higher scores are considered better outcomes, while lower scores are considered worse outcomes. The lower the score (1 to 4), the less likely the subject was to engage in exercise. The mean of the scores of the 9 items were calculated for each subject and the overall mean for the subjects was calculated at a group level with overall mean and standard deviation calculated at Baseline (Visit 3) and Follow-up/Early Termination (Visit 11) to calculate change from Baseline. Subject level and overall means could range from 1 to 4.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=16 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=15 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outpatient Phase: Hypoglycemic Confidence Scale (HCS) Change From Baseline
Baseline
|
3.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.541
|
3.34 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.616
|
3.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.447
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Hypoglycemic Confidence Scale (HCS) Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at Follow-up (Visit 11)
|
0.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.413
|
0.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.298
|
0.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.357
|
—
|
|
Outpatient Phase: Hypoglycemic Confidence Scale (HCS) Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at Early Termination
|
—
|
—
|
0.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.778
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 1) and Visit 4 (Day 3 or any day up to Day 29); At each visit, the associated hypoglycemia events were assessed continuously throughout the 30 (+2) minute period following a qualified exercise session.Population: All randomized subjects in the CRC Phase.
Mean incidence rate of hypoglycemia during or after moderate to high intensity aerobic exercise at each CRC Phase visit. With crossover, each subject had 2 exercise sessions; 1 visit and exercise session with each treatment (the combined data are presented in the Overall category) and assessed at the group level. Incidence rate is defined as the number of hypoglycemic events divided by the total number of qualified exercise sessions, assessed at group level. Qualified exercise session is: (1) confirmed blood glucose of 100-180 mg/dL prior to start of exercise, (2) study drug administered no more than 10 min prior to exercise (5 min target), (3) conducted exercise of moderate to high intensity for at least 30 min and no longer than 75 min, and (4) achieved a target heart rate of 80% of maximum calculated heart rate at least once during session. Hypoglycemic event defined as any hypoglycemic event occurring within 30 (+2) min after completion of a qualified exercise session.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=46 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=47 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=48 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRC Phase: Incidence Rate of Hypoglycemia During and After Moderate to High Intensity Aerobic Exercise Exercise.
|
0.02 events/session
|
0.19 events/session
|
0.11 events/session
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 1) and Visit 4 (Day 3 or any day up to Day 29); At each visit, the associated hypoglycemia events were assessed continuously throughout the 30 (+2) minute period following a qualified exercise session.Population: All randomized subjects in the CRC Phase.
CRC Phase: Mean number of hypoglycemic events associated with the qualified exercise sessions at each CRC Phase visit. With crossover, each subject had 2 exercise sessions; 1 visit and exercise session with each treatment (the combined data are presented in the Overall category) assessed at group level. A qualified exercise session is: (1) confirmed blood glucose of 100-180 mg/dL prior to start of exercise, (2) study drug administered no more than 10 min prior to exercise (5 min target), (3) conducted exercise of moderate to high intensity for at least 30 min and no longer than 75 min, and (4) achieved a target heart rate of 80% of maximum calculated heart rate at least once during session. A hypoglycemic event defined as any hypoglycemic event occurring within 30 (+2) min after completion of a qualified exercise session.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=46 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=47 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=48 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRC Phase: Mean Number of Hypoglycemic Events Exercise.
|
0.02 number of events/participant
|
0.19 number of events/participant
|
0.21 number of events/participant
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 1) and Visit 4 (Day 3 or any day up to Day 29); At each visit, the number of qualified exercise sessions that occurred.Population: All randomized subjects in the CRC Phase.
Mean number of high intensity aerobic exercise sessions at each CRC Phase visit. With crossover, each subject was to have 2 exercise sessions; 1 visit and exercise session with each treatment (the combined data are presented in the Overall category) and assessed at the group level. A qualified exercise session was defined as one where (1) confirmed blood glucose of 100-180 mg/dL prior to start of exercise, (2) study drug administered no more than 10 min prior to exercise (5 min target), (3) conducted exercise of moderate to high intensity for at least 30 min and no longer than 75 min, and (4) achieved a target heart rate of 80% of maximum calculated heart rate at least once during session.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=46 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=47 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=48 Participants
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-amr open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Overall
All 3 treatment groups in the Outpatient Phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRC Phase: Mean Number of Qualified High Intensity Aerobic Exercise Sessions
|
1 mean number of sessions/participant
|
1 mean number of sessions/participant
|
1.94 mean number of sessions/participant
|
—
|
Adverse Events
CRC Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
CRC Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CRC Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=46 participants at risk
CRC Phase: 2-arm randomized double-blind crossover, Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump
|
CRC Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=47 participants at risk
CRC Phase: 2-arm randomized double-blind crossover, Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in insulin pump
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=16 participants at risk
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection with 50% reduction in the insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Vehicle for Glucagon RTU With Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 participants at risk
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Vehicle for Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters vehicle with 50% reduction in insulin pump (double-blind arm)
|
Outpatient Phase: Glucagon RTU Without Insulin Pump Reduction
n=14 participants at risk
Outpatient Phase: 3-arm randomized comparison (2-arm double-blind, 1-arm open-label), Glucagon RTU Injection 30 microliters of 0.15 mg injection without a reduction in the insulin pump (open-label arm)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
32.6%
15/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
38.3%
18/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
37.5%
6/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
57.1%
8/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
21.4%
3/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site discomfort
|
8.7%
4/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
2.1%
1/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site irritation
|
2.2%
1/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.4%
3/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.4%
3/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site paresthesia
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
2.1%
1/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Application site erythema
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Application site rash
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site haematoma
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
8.7%
4/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
2.1%
1/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carpal tunnel syndrome
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.2%
1/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
4.3%
2/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
14.3%
2/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
4.3%
2/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
14.3%
2/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
2.1%
1/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
14.3%
2/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Onychomycosis
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.3%
2/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
2.1%
1/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
12.5%
2/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
14.3%
2/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
2.1%
1/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.2%
1/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
14.3%
2/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tenosynovitis
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
14.3%
2/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
14.3%
2/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
14.3%
2/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetiate
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Anhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermal cyst
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperkeratosis
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Metrorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
6.2%
1/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/46 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/47 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/16 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
7.1%
1/14 • From signing of Informed Consent Form through the followup visit (week 12)
Adverse events were reported and summarized separately for the 2 phases of the study (CRC Phase and Outpatient Phase).
|
Additional Information
Dawn Harper, VP Clinical Devlopment
Xeris Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place