Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intra-wound Vancomycin Powder in High Risk Patients

NCT ID: NCT03839914

Last Updated: 2024-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-01

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Surgical site infections (SSI) are not uncommon, especially in specific high-risk groups including spinal deformity and tumor (i.e. metastatic spine surgery) surgery. Well-recognized measures have been adopted to reduce surgical site infection, and the use of topical vancomycin powder has gained popularity in recent years. Given the lack of high-quality evidence for the use of topical vancomycin to reduce surgical site infections in open posterior spine surgery, which is currently the most common approach to spine surgery, it is crucial to study the use of vancomycin powder in reducing surgical site infections. This study is a prospective, single-blinded open label randomized controlled trial, with one arm of patients having local administration of 1g vancomycin powder which will be placed in the deep wound and subcutaneous layer prior to closure of surgical site by the orthopaedic surgeon, whereas the control arm will be without such application of vancomycin. Both arms of patients will still be undergoing the same operation procedures, as well as postoperative local wound drainage and wound care. This study will provide insights on the reduction rate in superficial and/or deep surgical site infection, and also assess the cost-effectiveness of using topical vancomycin in reducing surgical site infection between different disease groups, as well as any postoperative serum vancomycin toxicity and renal impairment. These proposed findings will provide valuable information for clinicians and institutions on future measures for surgical site infection of open posterior spine surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives:

Primary Objectives:

To evaluate the efficacy of intra-wound administration of vancomycin powder as add-on prophylactic intraoperative antibiotic in patients at high risk for surgical site infections after receiving open posterior spinal surgery

Secondary Objectives:

* To evaluate the safety of intra-wound administration of vancomycin powder as an add-on prophylactic intraoperative antibiotic
* To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of intra-wound administration of vancomycin powder as an add-on prophylactic intraoperative antibiotic compared to standard prophylactic intraoperative care

Hypothesis to be tested:

The intra-wound vancomycin powder as add-on prophylactic intraoperative antibiotic can significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infection.

Design and subjects:

The study is a prospective, parallel group, single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

All eligible patients who have consented to take part in the study will be randomized to either intervention or control group with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients allocated to the intervention group will receive intra-wound vancomycin powder 1gram as add-on prophylactic intraoperative antibiotic during the surgery. Patients allocated to the control group will not receive any add-on prophylactic intraoperative antibiotic. Patients will not know their treatment allocation until study termination.

Surgical site condition of all the patients will be assessed after the surgery. Investigator will examine the surgical wound and observe any signs and/or symptoms of SSI during hospitalization and follow-up visits until 1 year post-operation. For patients received instrumentation and fusion operation, additional radiographs of the operated sites will be performed for assessing any implant loosening and non-union at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. All clinical and radiological outcomes will be evaluated throughout the study period.

Instruments: Parameters include age, gender, smoking and drinking history, pathology (deformity, tumor, trauma, degenerative), location and spinal levels of surgery, if instrumentation is used, operative time, blood loss, need for transfusion, significant co-morbidities including diabetes mellitus, renal failure, immunocompromised state, and dural tear events.

Interventions: Patients are randomized into the treatment group where 1g of vancomycin powder is administered to the deep and superficial spinal wound, and the control group without vancomycin powder use.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome is the rate of surgical site infection. Secondary outcomes include vancomycin toxicity measured by vancomycin levels and renal function for three consecutive postoperative days, and cost-effectiveness calculation for each disease group. Additionally for those undergoing fusion surgery, 1-year follow-up assessment for fusion rates.

Data analysis:

For descriptive statistics, means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges will be presented for continuous variables, frequencies and percentages will be presented for categorical/ discrete variables.

Baseline Comparison The baseline characteristics of the intervention and control group will be evaluated. The Student's t-test or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (according to the frequency distribution of the variables studied) will be used to compare continuous variables, and Chi-square or Fisher's exact test will be used to compare categorical/discrete variables.

Primary Efficacy Analysis Fisher's exact test will be performed to evaluate the difference of SSI rates between the intervention and control group. The respective 95% confidence interval (CI) will be calculated and presented. If it is appropriate, the adjustment for baseline covariates will be made to the primary efficacy comparison. The analysis will primarily be carried out according to ITT population and subordinately based on PP population. Both ITT and PP results will be reported.

Adjusted Analysis for Confounding Factors:

If baseline imbalance is observed, adjustment for confounding factors in the primary analysis will be investigated by a multiple logistic regression for the potential risk factors with SSI as follows:

* Patient-related risk factors include socio-demographics and co-morbidities including, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal impairment/failure, immunocompromised state and nutritional deficiency.
* Procedure-related risk factors include type and site of surgery, intraoperative details including number of spinal level operated, length of instrumentation, use of fusion, use of drain, operation duration, presence of dural tear and number of surgeons in operating room
* Intra- and post-operative blood loss and blood product transfusion.

Cost-effectiveness analysis The cost-effectiveness analysis will estimate the Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER), which is the incremental cost per SSI prevented for the add-on administration of vancomycin powder compared with standard care over a 1-year post-operative period.

The total cost for SSI will be calculated by multiplying the quantity of resource use by unit costs. Future costs will be discounted at a rate of 3% per year.

Non-parametric bootstrapping will be used to determine the 95% CIs for ICERs. A non-parametric bootstrap replications of 1000 with replacement generating multiple data sets from the original data will be used. In each dataset, the statistic of interest (mean costs, SSIs, and ICERs) will be calculated. Multiple sensitivity analysis will be performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings.

Uncertainty in the estimates of the cost-effectiveness evaluation will be visualized by plotting the cost-effectiveness plane and acceptability curves. The acceptability curves will be used to determine the probability that the additional use of vancomycin powder will be cost-effective compared with standard care, at different values of ceiling ratio or acceptable willingness-to-pay threshold.

The cost-effectiveness analysis will be carried out according to the ITT population.

Safety Analysis The incidence of adverse effects (AEs) will be summarized by system organ class and severity grading according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) version 5. AEs will be tabulated by severity grading and relationship with study intervention.

The AESIs will be summarized in similar manner as all AEs. The safety analysis will be carried out according to in the safety population.

Expected results: Intra-wound administration of vancomycin powder reduces surgical site infections, is not toxic, and the most cost-effective disease groups are deformity correction and tumor surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Deformity Trauma Spinal Tumor Surgical Site Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Single-blinded open-label randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
This will be a single blinded trial as patients will not know their treatment allocation until the termination of study. Operating surgeons cannot be blinded to allocation. However, all clinical and radiological outcomes will be evaluated by an independent researcher who is blinded to the allocation. This researcher will be blinded to the study treatment throughout the study period.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention - Vancomycin

Intervention: 1g vancomycin powder locally applied to the deep wound and subcutaneous layer prior to closure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vancomycin powder

Intervention Type DRUG

For the intervention group, the use of 1g vancomycin powder to be placed in the deep wound and subcutaneous layer prior to closure.

Control - No vancomycin application

No intervention, control group All other wound closure procedure and wound care and monitoring are the same

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vancomycin powder

For the intervention group, the use of 1g vancomycin powder to be placed in the deep wound and subcutaneous layer prior to closure.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Female or male adult with age ≥18 years
2. Undergoing open posterior spinal surgery with instrumentation indicated for spinal deformity, trauma and tumor
3. Able to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of participation in the study
4. Appropriate voluntary written informed consent have been provided by patients

Exclusion Criteria

1. Has been treated with antibiotics due to primary spinal infection (i.e. spondylodiscitis) within 1 year prior to surgery
2. Ongoing treatment with antibiotics for other infections
3. Undergoing minimally invasive surgery or anterior-only surgical approaches or deformity correction surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (inherent low-risk for surgical site infections18)
4. Undergoing decompression-only surgery for cervical spine, spinal deformity, trauma and tumors
5. Has known history of allergy to vancomycin, penicillin and other glycopeptides (teicoplanin)
6. Has history of vancomycin resistance
7. Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Jason Pui Yin Cheung

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jason PY Cheung

Role: CONTACT

(852) 22554581

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Prudence Cheung

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Study protocol 1.4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id