Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adalimumab vs. Conventional Immunosuppression for Uveitis Trial (NCT NCT03828019)
NCT ID: NCT03828019
Last Updated: 2025-05-16
Results Overview
Corticosteroid-sparing success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart while on \<= 7.5 mg/day of corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid sparing between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
227 participants
6 months
2025-05-16
Participant Flow
Unit of analysis: Eyes with uveitis
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CIN)
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm twice a day (BID); max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
114 214
|
113 220
|
|
Overall Study
Primary Outcome 6 Months
|
112 211
|
105 204
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
109 206
|
98 190
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5 8
|
15 30
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CIN)
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm twice a day (BID); max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Incarcerated
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Adalimumab vs. Conventional Immunosuppression for Uveitis Trial
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=214 Eyes with uveitis
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=220 Eyes with uveitis
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
Total
n=434 Eyes with uveitis
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44 years
n=5 Participants
|
44 years
n=7 Participants
|
44 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
153 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
194 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
163 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
192 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of uveitis at baseline
|
0.9 years
n=5 Participants
|
0.9 years
n=7 Participants
|
0.9 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Intermediate
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Anterior and intermediate uveitis
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Birdshot chorioretinitis
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Serpiginous choroiditis
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Punctate inner choroiditis
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Sympathetic ophthalmia
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease early stage
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease late stage
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Isolated retinal vasculitis or panuveitis with retinal vasculitis
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Uveitis diagnostic class at baseline
Isolated choroiditis or panuveitis with choroiditis
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
NEI-VFQ-25
|
72 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
73 units on a scale
n=7 Participants
|
73 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
|
EQ-5D health related quality of life
|
0.93 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
0.84 units on a scale
n=7 Participants
|
0.85 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
|
Short-Form Health Survey- 36 item Physical component
|
52 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
54 units on a scale
n=7 Participants
|
54 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
|
Short-Form Health Survey- 36 item Mental component
|
53 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
52 units on a scale
n=7 Participants
|
52 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
|
81 Standard letters EDTRS eye chart
n=5 Participants
|
81 Standard letters EDTRS eye chart
n=7 Participants
|
81 Standard letters EDTRS eye chart
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eye lens status
Eye is phakic ( natural lens) with no opacity
|
102 Eyes with uveitis
n=214 Eyes with uveitis
|
87 Eyes with uveitis
n=220 Eyes with uveitis
|
189 Eyes with uveitis
n=434 Eyes with uveitis
|
|
Eye lens status
Eye is phakic (natural lens) with opacity/cataract
|
76 Eyes with uveitis
n=214 Eyes with uveitis
|
89 Eyes with uveitis
n=220 Eyes with uveitis
|
165 Eyes with uveitis
n=434 Eyes with uveitis
|
|
Eye lens status
Eye is pseudophakic (Interocular lens placed)
|
33 Eyes with uveitis
n=214 Eyes with uveitis
|
42 Eyes with uveitis
n=220 Eyes with uveitis
|
75 Eyes with uveitis
n=434 Eyes with uveitis
|
|
Eye lens status
Eye is aphakic (natural lens removed)
|
3 Eyes with uveitis
n=214 Eyes with uveitis
|
2 Eyes with uveitis
n=220 Eyes with uveitis
|
5 Eyes with uveitis
n=434 Eyes with uveitis
|
|
Retinal thickness at the center subfield
|
255 um
n=214 Eyes with uveitis
|
247 um
n=220 Eyes with uveitis
|
252 um
n=434 Eyes with uveitis
|
|
Immunotherapy at baseline
On no immunotherapy at baseline
|
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
178 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Immunotherapy at baseline
On one immunotherapy drug at baseline
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
On corticosteroids greater than of equal to 30 mg at baseline
On less than 30 mg corticosteroids
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
On corticosteroids greater than of equal to 30 mg at baseline
On greater than or equal to 30 mg corticosteriods
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
On corticosteroids greater than of equal to 30 mg at baseline
missing steroid treatment data at BL
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with follow-up data through the 6 month visit or had an event (corticosteroid sparing success) before they were lost to follow-up
Corticosteroid-sparing success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart while on \<= 7.5 mg/day of corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid sparing between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=112 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=105 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 6 Months After Randomization
|
0.69 Cumulative proportion of participants
Interval 0.6 to 0.77
|
0.54 Cumulative proportion of participants
Interval 0.44 to 0.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Participants with follow-up data through the 12 month visit or had an event (corticosteroid sparing success) before they were lost to follow-up
Corticosteroid-sparing success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart while on \<= 7.5 mg/day of corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid sparing between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=111 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=100 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 12 Months After Randomization
|
0.86 Cumulative proportion of participants
Interval 0.78 to 0.92
|
0.77 Cumulative proportion of participants
Interval 0.67 to 0.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with follow-up through the 6 months visit or had an event (discontinued corticosteroids) before lost to follow-up
Corticosteroid discontinuation success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart after discontinuing corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid discontinuation between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months and 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=112 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=105 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Corticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 6 Months
|
0.15 Cumulative proportion of participants
Interval 0.09 to 0.24
|
0.11 Cumulative proportion of participants
Interval 0.06 to 0.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsCorticosteroid discontinuation success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart after discontinuing corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid discontinuation between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months and 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=109 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=98 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Corticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 12 Months
|
0.55 Cumulative proportion of participants
Interval 0.45 to 0.64
|
0.40 Cumulative proportion of participants
Interval 0.3 to 0.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Participants with follow up treatment data
Corticosteroid dose was collected at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12. Mean corticosteroid dose per day was estimated with a negative binomial model at 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=113 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Corticosteroid Exposure Over 12 Months
|
11.8 mg/day of steroid use over 12 months
Interval 10.5 to 13.2
|
13.8 mg/day of steroid use over 12 months
Interval 12.3 to 15.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: All participants
Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 12 months. Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity (85 letters is 20/20 vision). Visual acuity data was collected at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12 and estimated at 12 months with a mixed model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=212 Eyes with uveitis
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=214 Eyes with uveitis
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity Change at 12 Months
|
3.6 Standard letters ETDRS eye chart
Interval 1.3 to 5.8
|
3.2 Standard letters ETDRS eye chart
Interval 1.7 to 4.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Participants with follow up retinal thickness data at enrollment and the 12 month visit
Macular edema is defined as central retinal thickness greater than or equal to 300 micrometers as measured by a masked grader's review of OCT images. Greater retinal thickness is associated with poorer vision. Outcome measure is the odds ratio comparing macular edema at 12 months to baseline macular edema. Macular edema was measured at baseline and months 3, 6, and 12. The odds ratio at 12 months was estimated with a mixed model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=198 Eyes with uveitis
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=188 Eyes with uveitis
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Macular Edema Over 12 Months of Follow up
|
0.34 Odds ratio
Interval 0.23 to 0.51
|
0.63 Odds ratio
Interval 0.42 to 0.94
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Participants with follow up after the baseline visit
Incidence of infections over 12 months of follow-up. Participants were asked about occurrences since the previous visit of infections requiring antibiotic or antiviral treatment. Data was collected at months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12. The rate of infections at 12 months was estimated with a negative binomial model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=113 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Infections at 12 Months
|
0.40 Number of infections per person year
Interval 0.27 to 0.61
|
0.37 Number of infections per person year
Interval 0.24 to 0.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Participants with follow-up that did not have elevated levels of AST or ALT at baseline
Cumulative percent of participants having elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) greater than twice the upper level of normal by 12 months. Elevated levels of AST and ALT may indicate decline in liver function. Lab values of AST and ALT were measured at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12 and the cumulative percent of participants with elevated lab values by 12 months was estimated by Kaplan Meier methods.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=111 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Elevated Levels of AST or ALT (Hepatoxicity) by 12 Months.
|
2 Cumulative percent of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.0
|
10 Cumulative percent of participants
Interval 4.0 to 16.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Participants with follow-up that did not have elevated creatine at the time of enrollment
Cumulative percent of participants having elevated creatine values (creatine greater than 30% above baseline or creatine \> 1.5 mg/dL) by 12 months. Increases in creatine levels may indicate decreased kidney function. Lab values of creatine were measured at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12 and the cumulative percent of participants with elevated creatine at 12 months was estimated by Kaplan Meier methods.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=111 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Elevated Creatine (Nephrotoxicity) by 12 Months
|
13 Cumulative percent of participants
Interval 6.0 to 18.0
|
14 Cumulative percent of participants
Interval 7.0 to 20.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsThe EQ-5D (EuroQol Group - 5 Dimension questionnaire) is a participant reported validated questionnaire that measures the patient's health status in five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The range of questionnaire index scores is -0.59 to 1 where score of 1 indicates best possible health. The outcome measure is the odds of having EQ-5D score of 1 (perfect health) at 12 months compared to the odds of having EQ-5d score = 1 at the baseline visit. Participants completed the EQ-5D questionnaire at baseline and months 3, 6 and 12. General estimating equations with a log link were used to assess the odds ratio at 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=113 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
EQ-5D (Health Utility)
|
0.89 Odds ratio
Interval 0.6 to 1.32
|
1.17 Odds ratio
Interval 0.78 to 1.74
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsStandard Form 36 item (SF-36) questionnaire is a validated participant reported measure of health related-quality of life. The physical component summary (PCS) is a score derived from the SF-36 that reflects a person's physical well-being. Range of scores is 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated better physical health. The minimally important clinical difference is 3-5 points. Outcome measure is the change in physical health score from baseline to 12 months. Participants completed the questionnaire at baseline and months 3, 6, and 12. The mean change from baseline at 12 months was estimated with a mixed model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=113 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General Health-related Quality of Life -Physical Component (SF-36)
|
-0.29 Difference in score on a scale
Interval -2.01 to 1.42
|
-1.68 Difference in score on a scale
Interval -3.27 to -0.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsStandard Form 36 item (SF-36) questionnaire is a validated participant reported measure of health related-quality of life. The mental health component summary (MCS) is a score derived from the SF-36 that reflects a person's mental health and well-being. Range of scores is 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better mental health. The minimally important clinical difference is 3-5 points. Outcome measure is the change in mental health score from baseline to 12 months. Participants completed the questionnaire at baseline and months 3, 6, and 12. The change from baseline at 12 months was estimated with a mixed model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=113 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Mental Health Component Standard Form 36 Item (SF-36)
|
1.56 Difference in score on a scale
Interval -0.55 to 3.67
|
0.97 Difference in score on a scale
Interval -1.19 to 3.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsVision-related quality of life was measured by the vision targeted subscale (excluding general health) from the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 item (VFQ-25). The VFQ-25 is a validated, participant reported measure of the aspects of visual functioning that are most important for persons who have chronic eye diseases. Higher scores indicate better vision. Scores range from 0 to 100. Meaningful difference is 4-6 points. Participants completed the VFQ-25 at baseline and months 3, 6 and 12. The outcome is the change in VFQ-25 from baseline to 12 months estimated with a mixed model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=113 Participants
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 Participants
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vision-related Quality of Life
|
6.7 Difference in score on a scale
Interval 4.7 to 8.7
|
5.1 Difference in score on a scale
Interval 2.9 to 7.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Participants with phakic (no prior cataract surgery at baseline) eyes and follow up information
Cumulative percent of uveitis eyes having cataract surgery by 12 months. Whether the patient had cataract surgery in the prior time period was determined at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,12 and the cumulative percent of eyes having cataract surgery by12 months was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=176 Eyes with uveitis
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=172 Eyes with uveitis
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cataract Surgery at 12 Months
|
2 Cumulative percent of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 5.0
|
11 Cumulative percent of eyes
Interval 4.0 to 17.0
|
Adverse Events
Adalimumab (ADA)
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=113 participants at risk
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 participants at risk
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
1.8%
2/110 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Eye disorders
Iris bombe
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Eye disorders
retinal detachment
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Eye disorders
Uveitis glaucoma
|
1.8%
2/113 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced
|
3.5%
4/113 • Number of events 4 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
1.8%
2/110 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inflammatory bowel disease
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
1.8%
2/110 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ocular lymphoma
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Miscarriage
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Social circumstances
Miscarriage of partner
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.00%
0/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Investigations
Intraocular pressure increased
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
1.8%
2/110 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous hemorrahage
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post cataract surgery vision loss
|
0.88%
1/113 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Adalimumab (ADA)
n=113 participants at risk
Adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection at dosage and frequency specified below; total duration of treatment is 12 months.
Adults (≥ 18 years of age) and adolescents ≥30 kg: 80 mg as initial dose; one week later by 40 mg then 40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents \<30 kg: 40 mg as initial dose; one week later 20 mg then 20 mg every 2 weeks.
Adalimumab (ADA): Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides in adults and children 2 years of age and older.
|
Conventional Immunosuppression (CON)
n=110 participants at risk
Conventional immunosuppressive agent selected by study ophthalmologist at dose and frequency specified below;12 month treatment duration.
Azathioprine: initially 2 mg/kg/day; max dose 200 mg/day. Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose 25 mg/wk. Mycophenolate initially 1 gm BID; max dose1.5 gm BID. Cyclosporine (Sandimmune - dose 2.5 mg/kg BID and Neoral dose 2 mg/kg BID. Tacrolimus initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.
Conventional immunosuppression (CON): The study ophthalmologist will select amongst the permissible drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for antimetabolites; cyclosporine or tacrolimus for calcineurin inhibitors) taking into account the side effect profile of each drug with respect to subject's clinical situation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Epiretinal membrane
|
15.0%
17/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
18.2%
20/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
40.7%
46/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
43.6%
48/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
mouth ulcer
|
18.6%
21/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
20.9%
23/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diahrrhea
|
37.2%
42/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
41.8%
46/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival swelling
|
20.4%
23/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
21.8%
24/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
37.2%
42/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
47.3%
52/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
13.3%
15/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
16.4%
18/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
67.3%
76/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
79.1%
87/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
General disorders
Impaired healing
|
24.8%
28/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
40.0%
44/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19 infection
|
9.7%
11/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
15.5%
17/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory infection
|
7.1%
8/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
1.8%
2/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Appetite disorder
|
33.6%
38/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
41.8%
46/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fat redistribution
|
26.5%
30/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
27.3%
30/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid retension
|
40.7%
46/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
46.4%
51/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weekness
|
38.9%
44/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
48.2%
53/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
68.1%
77/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
76.4%
84/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
5.3%
6/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
4.5%
5/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
67.3%
76/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
70.9%
78/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
38.1%
43/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
54.5%
60/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression/anxiety
|
53.1%
60/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
60.9%
67/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
68.1%
77/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
71.8%
79/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Easy bruising
|
48.7%
55/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
53.6%
59/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
28.3%
32/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
32.7%
36/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
33.6%
38/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
47.3%
52/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hair growth abnormal
|
18.6%
21/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
20.9%
23/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
30.1%
34/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
29.1%
32/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Swelling face
|
45.1%
51/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
60.9%
67/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric reflux disease
|
46.0%
52/113 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
58.2%
64/110 • From enrollment through the 12 months visit (end of treatment) non-serious events were reported on the monthly or bimonthly case report form. Non serious events were analyzed by counting persons who ever reported the event over the 12 month study. Serious adverse events were reported by the clinical site as the event occurred or the site became aware of the event. Adverse event information was available only for participants (ADA N = 113, CID N= 110) who continued in the study past enrollment.
Non serious adverse events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. The events were collected systematically (check off list) by asking participants if they experienced any occurrence of a specific diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other event or diagnosis. Serious adverse event collection was non systematic via an expediated serious adverse event form.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place