Continuous Versus Discontinuous Suture in the Perineals Lesions

NCT ID: NCT03825211

Last Updated: 2019-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

134 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The hypothesis: Women who have a continuous suture have better health outcomes Two types of sutures were placed in the perineal lesion, using different techniques. Group A received continuous sutures and Group B had interrupted sutures placed. The women were followed-up as follows: Day of childbirth and in the postpartum period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The hypothesis: Women who have a continuous suture have better health outcomes Two types of sutures were placed in the perineal lesion, using different techniques. Group A received continuous sutures and Group B had interrupted sutures placed. The women were allocated to a treatment group using a computer-generated random numbers table. The sequence was placed in individual opaque envelopes that were opened when a woman met the inclusion criteria.

The health personnel that carry out the sutures had taken a training course on continuous suture technique and had at least one year experience in this technique. Additionally, this person had a minimum of five years of experience in attending deliveries and therefore also in the suturing of perineal lesions. The sutures were placed by ten trained midwives. Around 5% of the midwives in Torrecardenas, 10% in the Hospital Complex of Jaen, 12% in Granada, and 20% of the midwives in Ubeda and Linares participated.

Data collection Data was collected on sociodemographic variables, type of perineal trauma (tear of second-degree or episiotomy), type of suture used, time spent placing suture, number of suture packets used, complications, analogical scale of pain, type of pain, need for analgesia, wound condition, care performed, urinary and/or fecal incontinence, start of sexual relations, start of physical activity and type of newborn feeding. It was also collected the start and type of delivery, medication during dilation, type of analgesia used, gestational week, duration of dilation, second stage labor and delivery, and data on the newborn.

Information was gathered by midwives which interviewed the women in the labor room, providing them with an informed consent form, and hiding the suture technique that was going to be used. The rest of the data were obtained from the clinical history, maternal record book and phone calls made for the follow-up. The women did not know at any point which suture technique had been used.

Follow-up

The women were followed-up as follows:

Day of childbirth: in the postpartum period, the midwife collected data on the type of delivery, need for epidural analgesia, duration of dilation, stage two of labor, delivery, type of perineal trauma, time used to place suture, number of suture packets, wound complications, newborn weight and the Apgar score at one minute and at five minutes. After the suture was placed, they assessed pain on the pain scale and assessed the wound.

Follow-up after delivery was done at two hours, 24 hours, 15 days and three months. Pain, need for analgesia, wound condition, sphincter incontinence and the start of sexual relations were assessed (15 days and three months).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perineal Tear Episiotomy Wound

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous suture

All parts of the perineal lesion (vaginal mucosa , perineal muscle and skin) be sutured with the same suture thread. A single suture for perineal lesion

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous suture in the perineals lesions

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A continuous suture of the vagina, muscle and skin is performed continuously, without knotting or cutting the suture thread.

Discontinuous suture

Interrupted suture technique: vaginal mucosa, perineal muscle and skin are sutured with separate and different threads, that is, the vaginal mucosa is sutured with a thread, then independently the perineal muscle is sutured with another type of thread and finally the skin is also sutured independently with another different thread. Three independent sutures for each of the parts that form a single perineal lesion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Discontinuous suture in the perineals lesions

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Suture the muscle independently of the vagina and independently of the skin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous suture in the perineals lesions

A continuous suture of the vagina, muscle and skin is performed continuously, without knotting or cutting the suture thread.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Discontinuous suture in the perineals lesions

Suture the muscle independently of the vagina and independently of the skin

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>18 years
* Primiparous
* Singleton and eutocic delivery
* Second-degree perineal tear or an episiotomy as part of labor
* Newborn weight between 2500 g and 4000 g

Exclusion Criteria

* Language barrier (to no speak spanish)
* Problems related to the pelvic floor prior to labor (prolapse, incontinence, vulva varices)
* Dyspareunia or sexual dysfunction
* Hemorrhoids perceived as uncomfortable or painful
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of JaƩn

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Juan Miguel Martinez-Galiano

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Martinez-Galiano JM, Arredondo-Lopez B, Hidalgo-Ruiz M, Narvaez-Traverso A, Lopez-Moron I, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Suture type used for perineal injury repair and sexual function: a randomised controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 29;10(1):10553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67659-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32601329 (View on PubMed)

Martinez-Galiano JM, Arredondo-Lopez B, Molina-Garcia L, Camara-Jurado AM, Cocera-Ruiz E, Rodriguez-Delgado M. Continuous versus discontinuous suture in perineal injuries produced during delivery in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2655-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31842788 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Ujaen Sutura Lesiones

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id