Transsternal Versus Transcervical Thymectomy

NCT ID: NCT03825185

Last Updated: 2019-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1993-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: To comparatively analyze long-term results and complications of transcervical (TCT) and transsternal thymectomy (TST) in a randomized controlled trial with a mean follow-up of ten years.

Results: Outcomes 10 years after surgery by MGFA post-intervention status showed that complete stable remission was achieved in 8 (21.6%) patients of the TCT group, and in 20 patients (55.5%) of the TST group.

Conclusions: Transcervical and transsternal thymectomy are safe and result in significant improvement of patients with Myasthenia Gravis. TST has superior results in terms of complete stable remission at 10 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Thymectomy is an effective treatment for Myasthenia Gravis in the adult population. Surgical removal of the thymus can be performed through several approaches. Comparison of the most commonly used surgical techniques through randomized control trials with long-term follow-up is scarce.

Objective: To comparatively analyze long-term results and complications of transcervical (TCT) and transsternal thymectomy (TST) in a randomized controlled trial with a mean follow-up of ten years.

Results: A total of 100 patients were randomized to transsternal thymectomy (50), and transcervical procedure (50). There were not significant differences in the demographic characteristics, MGFA clinical classification, and MGFA therapy status between groups before surgery. Twenty patients were lost of follow up during the first year and were excluded. Our final group included 40 patients in each group. Three patients in TCT group (7.5%) and 6 patients in the TST group (15%) developed surgical complications. At 1 year of follow-up, 7 patients (17.5%) of the TCT group were asymptomatic in comparison with 15 patients (37.5%) of group TST, after 10 years of follow-up, 26 cases (72.9%) in group TCT were asymptomatic in comparison with 29 cases (80.5%) of group TST. Outcomes 10 years after surgery by MGFA post-intervention status showed that complete stable remission was achieved in 8 (21.6%) patients of the TCT group, and in 20 patients (55.5%) of the TST group.

Conclusions: Transcervical and transsternal thymectomy are safe and result in significant improvement of patients with Myasthenia Gravis. TST has superior results in terms of complete stable remission at 10 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myasthenia Gravis, Thymectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A total of 100 patients with diagnosis of MG referred to our center for surgical treatment between 1993 and 2003 were invited to participate in the study. Software (Power and Precision, Biostat, NJ) was used for sample size calculation. Software (G\* Power 3.1) was used for sample size calculation. Sample size was calculated based on a 4.0% difference in the remission rate between TC (40%) and TS (44%). The calculated sample size was 26 patients in each group. Considering a 10 to 20% loss of follow up in the long term, a total of 50 patients per group were included.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transcervical Thymectomy

50 patients were randomized to transcervical thymectomy for treatment of myasthenia gravis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcervical Thymectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transcervical Thymectomy. All transcervical thymectomies were performed with an 8 cm transversal cervicotomy was performed approximately 2 cm above the sternal notch. Musculocutaneous flaps were developed up to the thyroid cartilage and the suprasternal notch. Strap muscles were split in the middle and retracted laterally. The upper horns of the thymus were exposed and were freed up to the level of the innominate vein. All tributary veins were suture ligated. A sternal retractor was then placed to retract the sternum upward until the patient was nearly lifted off the table. The rest of the Thymus was dissected, from the pericardium and the pleura. Care was specially taken to remove as much fatty tissue adjacent to the thymus as possible preserving the phrenic nerves.

TranssternalThymectomy

50 patients were randomized to transternal thymectomy for treatment of myasthenia gravis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transsternal Thymectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transsternal Thymectomy. A standard formal median sternotomy was carried out. The sternum was retracted laterally using an automatic retractor. All thymic tissue with the adjacent adipose tissue was removed starting with the inferior horns of the thymus. Thymic vessels were ligated and dissection was continued until the upper horns could be separated from the thyroid. A mediastinal tube was placed before closing the sternum and was kept in close suction for 2 to 3 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcervical Thymectomy

Transcervical Thymectomy. All transcervical thymectomies were performed with an 8 cm transversal cervicotomy was performed approximately 2 cm above the sternal notch. Musculocutaneous flaps were developed up to the thyroid cartilage and the suprasternal notch. Strap muscles were split in the middle and retracted laterally. The upper horns of the thymus were exposed and were freed up to the level of the innominate vein. All tributary veins were suture ligated. A sternal retractor was then placed to retract the sternum upward until the patient was nearly lifted off the table. The rest of the Thymus was dissected, from the pericardium and the pleura. Care was specially taken to remove as much fatty tissue adjacent to the thymus as possible preserving the phrenic nerves.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transsternal Thymectomy

Transsternal Thymectomy. A standard formal median sternotomy was carried out. The sternum was retracted laterally using an automatic retractor. All thymic tissue with the adjacent adipose tissue was removed starting with the inferior horns of the thymus. Thymic vessels were ligated and dissection was continued until the upper horns could be separated from the thyroid. A mediastinal tube was placed before closing the sternum and was kept in close suction for 2 to 3 days.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of MG confirmed by biochemical or physiologic studies and a CT excluding thymoma. -

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria were contraindications for major surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIBH 531 (1995)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id