Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Cost-efficiency Analysis of Primary Assessors for Patients With Knee Pain in Primary Care (NCT NCT03822533)
NCT ID: NCT03822533
Last Updated: 2024-05-06
Results Overview
Health-related quality of life was used as the generic measure for health improvement and was measured at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. The Swedish version of Euroqol-5 dimensions-3 levels (EQ5D-3L) was used to assess perceived self-rated health-related quality of life. The questionnaire contained five dimensions and resulted in an index ranging from -0,549 to 1 using the United Kingdom tariffs. An index of 1 indicate full health. For each participant, EQ-5D-3L index was used when calculating quality adjusted life years (QALY) using linear interpolation between each measurement point and the trapezoidal rule to calculate the "area under the curve". QALY range from 0 to 1, where 0 means death and 1 equals full health.
COMPLETED
NA
363 participants
12 months
2024-05-06
Participant Flow
Excluded (n=294) * Not meeting inclusion criteria (n=185) * Declined to participate (n=15) * Excluded due to exclusion criteria (n=94)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescription, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline
STARTED
|
35
|
34
|
|
Baseline
COMPLETED
|
35
|
34
|
|
Baseline
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
3 Month Follow-up
STARTED
|
35
|
34
|
|
3 Month Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
30
|
28
|
|
3 Month Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
6
|
|
6 Month Follow-up
STARTED
|
30
|
28
|
|
6 Month Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
27
|
28
|
|
6 Month Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
0
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
STARTED
|
27
|
28
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
21
|
23
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescription, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
3 Month Follow-up
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
4
|
|
3 Month Follow-up
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
2
|
|
6 Month Follow-up
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
0
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
3
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
Pregnancy
|
0
|
1
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
Surgery
|
2
|
0
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
Wrong address
|
1
|
0
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
No symptoms
|
1
|
0
|
|
12 Month Follow-up
Changed primary care center
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=35 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=34 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Total
n=69 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=35 Participants
|
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=34 Participants
|
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=69 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
21 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Level of education
Primary school
|
8 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Level of education
Secondary school
|
15 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Level of education
Tertiary school
|
12 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Current Employment
Employed/working
|
19 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Current Employment
Unemployed
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Current Employment
Retired/early retirement
|
15 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Current Employment
Sick leave
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
|
Pain duration (months)
|
14 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22 • n=35 Participants
|
10 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=34 Participants
|
12 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19 • n=69 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
30 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=35 Participants
|
29 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=34 Participants
|
29 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=69 Participants
|
|
Health-related quality of life
|
0.73 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.121 • n=35 Participants
|
0.62 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.222 • n=34 Participants
|
0.67 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.185 • n=69 Participants
|
|
Pain intensity (visual analogue scale 0-100)
|
45 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9 • n=35 Participants
|
52 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4 • n=34 Participants
|
49 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5 • n=69 Participants
|
|
Physical function in lower extremities
|
12 number of stands from sitting on a chair
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=35 Participants
|
11 number of stands from sitting on a chair
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=34 Participants
|
12 number of stands from sitting on a chair
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=69 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Total 21 patients participated in the 12 month follow up in the physiotherapy group and 23 in the physician group. Imputation using multiple imputation and the analysis included all enrolled patients in each group (35 in the physiotherapy group, and 34 in the physician group).
Health-related quality of life was used as the generic measure for health improvement and was measured at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. The Swedish version of Euroqol-5 dimensions-3 levels (EQ5D-3L) was used to assess perceived self-rated health-related quality of life. The questionnaire contained five dimensions and resulted in an index ranging from -0,549 to 1 using the United Kingdom tariffs. An index of 1 indicate full health. For each participant, EQ-5D-3L index was used when calculating quality adjusted life years (QALY) using linear interpolation between each measurement point and the trapezoidal rule to calculate the "area under the curve". QALY range from 0 to 1, where 0 means death and 1 equals full health.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=35 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=34 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Difference in Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY)
|
0.74 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
0.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
Total costs with the societal perspective includes health care visits, prescribed drugs, productivity loss and unpaid work compensation. Data were retrieved from medical records.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Difference in Total Costs (Societal Perspective)
|
633 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 620
|
996 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 1276
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
Health care perspective includes health care visits and prescribed drugs. Data were collected through medical records.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Difference in Total Costs (Health Care Perspective)
|
515 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 541
|
748 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 885
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: All enrolled patients were included in this analysis which included imputed data.
Mean difference in costs divided by mean difference in quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Presenting the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis (ICER). Societal perspective includes health care visits, prescribed drugs, productivity loss and unpaid work compensation Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio was derived from the model where a measure of dispersion was not an output of the model
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=69 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) - Societal Perspective
|
24266 Ratio (Euro/QALY)
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: All enrolled patients were included in this analysis which included imputed data.
Mean difference in costs divided by mean difference in quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Presenting the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis (ICER). Health care perspective includes health care visits and prescribed drugs. Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio was derived from the model where a measure of dispersion was not an output of the model
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=69 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) - Health Care Perspective
|
15533 Ratio (Euro/QALY)
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
Number of visits registered in patients journal multiplied with the cost.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Costs for Physiotherapy Visits
|
380 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 377
|
332 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 641
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
Number of visits registered in patients journal multiplied with cost
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Costs for Physician Visits
|
39 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 95
|
217 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 140
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
Number of referrals to radiography registered in patients journal multiplied with its costs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Costs for Referrals to Radiography
|
7.9 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 25
|
32 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
Number of referrals to orthopedic surgeon registered in patients journal multiplied with the costs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Costs for Referrals to Orthopedic Surgeon
|
22 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 85
|
33 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 100
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
Data extraction from a drug database for prescribed drugs belonging to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification groups M01 anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic products, M02 topical products for joint and muscular pain, M03 muscle relaxants, M09 other drugs for disorders of the musculoskeletal system, N02A opioids, N02B other analgesics and antipyretics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Costs for Collected Prescribed Drugs
|
7.8 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 34
|
6.6 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
Productivity loss included the time for visiting health care, telephone calls, traveling, waiting time and costs for sick leave days. The costs was calculated with gross salary including social fees.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Costs for Productivity Loss
|
111 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 91
|
365 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 853
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Based on retrieved medical records where 32 patients could be analysed in the physiotherapy group and 29 patients in the physician group regardless if they attended to the planned follow ups in the study.
The costs for the time the patients were visiting health care or consulting via telephone, including traveling and waiting time. Production loss was calculated with net mean salary. Included participants that reported they were retired or unemployed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
n=32 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physiotherapist assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve individual or group treatment including patient education and physical exercise.
Patients could seek a physician anytime after the first assessment with the physiotherapist.
Physiotherapist as primary assessor: Physiotherapist diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
Physician as Primary Assessor
n=29 Participants
The healthcare process started with a physician assessment and treatment. Treatments could involve drug prescriptions, referral to x-ray, referrals to other healthcare providers and sick-leave.
Patients could seek a physiotherapist anytime after the first assessment with the physician.
Physician as primary assessor: Physician diagnosed and treated the patient.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Costs for Unpaid Work Compensation
|
125 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 103
|
123 Euro (currency)
Standard Deviation 191
|
Adverse Events
Physiotherapist as Primary Assessor
Physician as Primary Assessor
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Chan-Mei Ho-Henriksson, PhD-student, RPT
Region Västra Götaland, Närhälsan
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place