Study of 2 Ribociclib Doses in Combination With Aromatase Inhibitors in Women With HR+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03822468

Last Updated: 2025-10-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

376 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-11

Study Completion Date

2024-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a reduced ribociclib starting dose of 400 mg in combination with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) (letrozole or anastrozole) for the treatment of pre- and postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (aBC) who have received no prior therapy for advanced disease. Premenopausal women were required to receive goserelin in both treatment arms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were assigned at visit Cycle 1 Day 1 to one of the following two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1:

* Experimental arm: Ribociclib 400 mg (2 × 200 mg tablets by mouth) QD on Days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off ribociclib (Days 22 to 28) in combination with ET consisting of:

• For postmenopausal women:
* Letrozole 2.5 mg by mouth QD continuously or anastrozole 1 mg by mouth QD continuously

• For premenopausal women:
* Letrozole 2.5 mg by mouth QD continuously or anastrozole 1 mg by mouth QD continuously, combined with goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks.
* Control arm: Ribociclib 600 mg (3 × 200 mg tablets by mouth) QD on Days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off ribociclib (Days 22 to 28) in combination with ET consisting of:

* For postmenopausal women:

\~ Letrozole 2.5 mg by mouth QD continuously or anastrozole 1 mg by mouth QD continuously.
* For premenopausal women:

* Letrozole 2.5 mg by mouth QD continuously or anastrozole 1 mg by mouth QD continuously, combined with goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks.

Participants received study treatment until disease progression (radiologically documented according to RECIST 1.1 criteria), unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation from the study treatment for any other reason.

For participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than documented disease progression, death, lost to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent, tumor assessments continued to be performed until disease progression, death, lost to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent (post-treatment efficacy follow-up).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ribociclib 400 mg

Ribociclib 400 mg QD 3 weeks on/1 week off + letrozole or anastrozole (+goserelin in premenopausal women)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ribociclib

Intervention Type DRUG

Ribociclib (at a dosage of 400 mg or 600 mg) QD orally taken on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off ribociclib (days 22 to 28). Ribociclib was supplied as 200 mg tablets as individual patient supply packaged bottles.

Anastrozole

Intervention Type DRUG

Anastrozole 1 mg tablets for oral use QD continuously

Letrozole

Intervention Type DRUG

Letrozole 2.5 mg tablets for oral use QD continuously

Goserelin

Intervention Type DRUG

Goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks (pre-menopausal women only)

Ribociclib 600 mg

Ribociclib 600 mg QD 3 weeks on/1 week off + letrozole or anastrozole (+ goserelin in premenopausal women)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ribociclib

Intervention Type DRUG

Ribociclib (at a dosage of 400 mg or 600 mg) QD orally taken on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off ribociclib (days 22 to 28). Ribociclib was supplied as 200 mg tablets as individual patient supply packaged bottles.

Anastrozole

Intervention Type DRUG

Anastrozole 1 mg tablets for oral use QD continuously

Letrozole

Intervention Type DRUG

Letrozole 2.5 mg tablets for oral use QD continuously

Goserelin

Intervention Type DRUG

Goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks (pre-menopausal women only)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ribociclib

Ribociclib (at a dosage of 400 mg or 600 mg) QD orally taken on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off ribociclib (days 22 to 28). Ribociclib was supplied as 200 mg tablets as individual patient supply packaged bottles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Anastrozole

Anastrozole 1 mg tablets for oral use QD continuously

Intervention Type DRUG

Letrozole

Letrozole 2.5 mg tablets for oral use QD continuously

Intervention Type DRUG

Goserelin

Goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks (pre-menopausal women only)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LEE011

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient has advanced (loco-regionally recurrent or metastatic) breast cancer not amenable to curative therapy.
* Patient has a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of ER-positive and/or PgR-positive breast cancer based on the most recently analyzed tissue sample, and all tested by local laboratory.
* Patient has HER2-negative breast cancer defined as a negative in situ hybridization test or an IHC status of 0, 1+ or 2+. If IHC is 2+, a negative in situ hybridization (FISH, CISH, or SISH) test is required by local laboratory testing and based on the most recently analyzed tissue sample.
* Patient must have measurable disease, i.e., at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST version 1.1. (a lesion in a previously irradiated site may only be counted as a target lesion if there is clear evidence of progression since the irradiation).
* Patient has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1.
* Standard 12-lead ECG values defined as the mean of the triplicate ECGs and assessed by the central laboratory:

* QTcF interval at screening \< 450 ms (QT interval using Fridericia's correction)
* Mean resting heart rate 50 to 90 bpm (determined from the ECG)
* Women of childbearing potential (CBP), defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, must have confirmed negative serum pregnancy test (for β-hCG) within 14 days prior to randomization.
* Women of CBP must be willing to use highly effective methods of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with symptomatic visceral disease or any disease burden that makes the patient ineligible for endocrine therapy per the investigator's judgment.
* Patient who received any prior systemic anti-cancer therapy(including endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, prior CDK4/6 inhibitors) for aBC. Patients who received neo-/adjuvant therapy for breast cancer are eligible.
* Patient is concurrently using other anti-cancer therapy.
* Patient has had major surgery within 14 days prior to starting study drug or has not recovered from major toxicities.
* Patient has received extended-field radiotherapy ≤ 4 weeks or limited field radiotherapy ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomization, and has not recovered to grade 1 or better from related side effects of such therapy (with the exception of alopecia or other toxicities not considered a safety risk for the patient at investigator's discretion). Patients in whom ≥
* 25% of the bone marrow has been previously irradiated are also excluded.
* Patient has a concurrent malignancy or malignancy within 3 years of the randomization date, with the exception of adequately treated basal or squamous cell skin carcinoma, or curatively resected cervical carcinoma in situ.
* Patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement unless they meet specific stability criteria.
* Patient has clinically significant, uncontrolled heart disease and/or cardiac repolarization abnormality.
* Patient is currently receiving or has received systemic corticosteroids ≤ 2 weeks prior to starting study drug, and has not fully recovered from side effects of such treatment.

Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion may apply.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Southern Cancer Center PC

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Marin Cancer Care

Greenbrae, California, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Florida Retina Institute

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Weinberg Cancer Institute at FSH

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Nebraska Hematology Oncology P C

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Nebraska Cancer Specialists

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Cancer Cntr Of Nevada

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

New York Oncology Hematology

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai School Of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Millennium Research Clin Develop

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

Northwest Medical Specialties

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Juan, , Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Namur, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Goiânia, , Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São José do Rio Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cambridge, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Valledupar, Cesar Department, Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ibagué, Tolima Department, Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montería, , Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San José, , Costa Rica

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brno, Czech Republic, Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lyon 08, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Langen, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Weiden, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Delhii, , India

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amman, , Jordan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kaunas, LTU, Lithuania

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Trujillo, La Libertad, Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Borja, Lima region, Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Isidro, Lima region, Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Miguel, Lima region, Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Loures, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Parktown, , South Africa

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Colombia Costa Rica Czechia Finland France Germany Hungary India Jordan Lithuania Peru Portugal Russia South Africa Sweden Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cardoso F, Jacot W, Kuemmel S, Gupta S, Cruz F, Balaraman R, Ferreira A, Ahola T, Chapko Y, Zhukova L, Chiang W, Li Z, Ji Y, Kaakiou N, Bolotova N, Sparano JA. 600- vs 400-mg First-Line Ribociclib in Hormone Receptor-Positive/ERBB2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: The AMALEE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2025 Sep 25:e253687. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.3687. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40996770 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.novctrd.com/ctrdweb/patientsummary/patientsummaries?patientSummaryId=2786

A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on www.novctrd.com

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-004234-15

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CLEE011A2207

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ribociclib for HR-positive HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT07164976 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2